Skip to main content

Policy Analytics: Definitions, Components, Methods, and Illustrative Examples

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Policy Analytics, Modelling, and Informatics

Abstract

There are many ways to define policy analytics. In fact, different terms are used for what could be considered the same phenomenon: the use of data and analytical techniques to make policy decisions. Policy analytics, policy modelling, and policy informatics are just some of the most used terms by scholars and practitioners. There is no clarity, however, in terms of where the boundaries of this concept lie and what main analytical methods it includes. First, regarding the conceptual boundaries, some experts argue that policy analytics includes analysis-related tasks only and has nothing to do with data preparation, management, governance, and stewardship. For other experts, policy analytics encompasses all the activities in the data lifecycle and includes elements outside of the analytic sphere, such as information technologies, stakeholder involvement, and a deep understanding of the context of use and application domains. Second, in terms of analytical methods, some analysts consider data mining, machine learning, and other computer science approaches to be the only valid tools. For others, statistical analysis as well as simulation approaches should also be called analytics. In this chapter, we propose a comprehensive and integrative view in which policy analytics goes beyond data analysis and includes management and preparation of data as well as very diverse techniques such as computer simulation, social network analysis, statistics, geographic information systems, and data mining techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chen H, Chiang RH, Storey VC (2012) Business intelligence and analytics: From big data to big impact. MIS Q 36(4):1165–1188

    Google Scholar 

  • Conklin EJ (2006) Dialogue mapping: building shared understanding of wicked problems. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes SS, Cresswell AM, Pardo TA (2009) From “need to know” to “need to share”: tangled problems, information boundaries, and the building of public sector knowledge networks. Public Adm Rev 69(3):392–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörry S, Decoville A (2013) Governance and transportation policy networks in the cross-border metropolitan region of Luxembourg: a social network analysis. Eur Urban Reg Stud. doi:10.1177/0969776413490528

  • Forrester JW (1992) Policies, decisions and information sources for modeling. Eur J Oper Res 59(1):42–63. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(92)90006-U

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson A (2010) Local by social. How local authorities can use social media to achieve more for less. NESTA, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert N, Troitzsch KG (2002) Simulation for the social scientist. Open University Press, Buckingham

    Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Garcia JR (2014) Systemic thinking and system dynamics for the analysis of public policies: fundamentals and recommendations. In: CIDE Mexico Working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan D, Gao W, Su W, Li H, Hokao K (2011) Modeling and dynamic assessment of urban economy–resource–environment system with a coupled system dynamics–geographic information system model. Ecol Indic 11(5):1333–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen M, Helbig N (2016) Innovating and changing the policy-cycle: policy-makers be prepared! Gov Inf Q. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2015.11.009. Epub on 29 January 2016

  • Koliba C, Zia A, Lee B (2011) Governance informatics: utilizing computer simulation models to manage complex governance networks. Innov J Innov Public Sector 16(1):3–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Luna-Reyes LF, Gil-Garcia JR, Rich E, Andersen DF (2017) Using system dynamics for the analysis of complex social problems and public policy alternatives: fundamentals and recommendations. In: Chen Y-C, Ahn M (eds) Routledge handbook on information technology in government. Routledge, London, pp 71–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Maliene V, Grigonis V, Palevicius V, Griffiths S (2011) Geographic information system: old principles with new capabilities. Urban Design Int 16(1):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marin A, Wellman B (2011) Social network analysis: an introduction. In: Carrington PJ, Scott J (eds) The Sage handbook of social network analysis. Sage, London, pp 11–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohri M, Rostamizadeh A, Talwalkar A (2012) Foundations of machine learning. MIT press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Morecroft J (2007) Strategic modelling and business dynamics: a feedback approach. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Park CH, Johnson EW (2017) An event-driven lens for bridging formal organizations and informal online participation: how policy informatics enables just-in-time responses to crises. In: Gil-Garcia JR et al (eds) Policy analytics, modelling, and informatics: innovative tools for solving complex social problems. Springer, New York (in this volume)

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter NW (2017) The value of system dynamics modeling in policy analytics and planning. In: Gil-Garcia JR et al (eds) Policy analytics, modelling, and informatics: innovative tools for solving complex social problems. Springer, New York (in this volume)

    Google Scholar 

  • Puron-Cid G, Gil-Garcia JR, Luna-Reyes LF (2016) Opportunities and challenges of policy informatics: tackling complex problems through the combination of open data, technology and analytics. Int J Public Admin Digit Age 3(2):66–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson GP, Pugh AL (1981) Introduction to system dynamics modelling with dynamo. Productivity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson GP, Andersen DF, Luna-Reyes LF (2015) Joining minds: system dynamics group model building to create public value. In: Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Bloomberg L (eds) Public value and public administration. Georgetown University Press, Washington, pp 53–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayama H (2015) Introduction to the modeling and analysis of complex systems. Open SUNY Textbooks, Binghamton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Ramon Gil-Garcia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gil-Garcia, J.R., Pardo, T.A., Luna-Reyes, L.F. (2018). Policy Analytics: Definitions, Components, Methods, and Illustrative Examples. In: Gil-Garcia, J., Pardo, T., Luna-Reyes, L. (eds) Policy Analytics, Modelling, and Informatics. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 25. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61762-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics