Skip to main content

Impact and Perception: Reacting to the Past at Middle Tennessee State University

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 464 Accesses

Abstract

Like most liberal arts colleges in the country, that at Middle Tennessee State University has experienced a substantial drop in enrollment over the past six years. Declining enrollments, a state mandate to improve retention and persistence, and a national climate that undervalues the liberal arts have created a need to ensure that students recognize the importance and value of their liberal arts experiences. Using a pre-test/post-test survey, we seek to determine student habit and perception changes concerning liberal arts that result from participation in Reacting to the Past (RTTP) experiences. Since RTTP is a cost-effective high-impact practice, it is a viable tool to engage students, allowing them to see firsthand why liberal arts are important for their educational experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We would like to acknowledge Benjamin Simpkins, former Director of Data Management and Institutional Research at Middle Tennessee State University, who aided in survey design, administration, and data entry and compiled student data for our study. See also: http://tennesseepromise.gov/

  2. 2.

    Note that this number, which is based on course enrollments at the beginning of the relevant semesters, includes some students who have taken multiple courses with Reacting to the Past experiences as well as some students who may have withdrawn early in the semester.

  3. 3.

    Predictive courses are those in which a student’s performance is a strong determinant of whether or not he or she will persist to graduation in a particular major. History general education courses are predictive across majors in part, we suspect, because of the emphasis on effective (written) communication and critical thinking skills necessary for success in college.

  4. 4.

    For example, see Carnes 2014; Higbee 2008; Kelly 2009; Lightcap 2009; Olwell and Stevens 2015.

  5. 5.

    For the definition and characteristics of high-impact practices, see Kuh and Schneider 2008.

  6. 6.

    Note that freshman seminars are considered to be HIPs whether or not they include RTTP. Thus, analyzing RTTP within other contexts is something that is necessary to understand the impact of this pedagogy itself.

  7. 7.

    http://nsse.indiana.edu

  8. 8.

    24% of students in an RTTP course who completed the pre-test and the post-test knew the course contained an RTTP game, so some self-selection into RTTP classes is likely to have occurred. Because there may be differences between those students who participated in RTTP previously and first-time participants, we examined the responses for students in RTTP classes for the first time and found that they report a substantially larger decline in discomfort with public speaking on the post-test (−7.9%) and are less likely to report never asking questions in class than the other groups (−3.2%).

  9. 9.

    Specifically, Communication, English, Foreign Languages, History, Fine & Performing Arts, Philosophy, Political Science, & Sociology.

  10. 10.

    Note, however, Olwell and Stevens in their cautions against having a single solution for retention issues (2015, pp. 570–571).

References

  • AAC&U. (n.d.). LEAP campus toolkit: Resources and models for innovation. Retrieved from http://leap.aacu.org/toolkit/high-impact-practices

  • Brownell, J. E., & Swaner, L. E. (2010). Five high-impact practices: Research on learning outcomes, completion, and quality. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. R. (2014). Roleplaying music history: Honing general education skills via “reacting to the past”. Journal of Music History Pedagogy, 5(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnes, M. C. (2014). Minds on fire: How role-immersion games transform college. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Higbee, M. D. (2008). How reacting to the past games “made me want to come to class and learn”: An assessment of the reacting pedagogy at EMU, 2007–2008. The Scholarship of Teaching and Learning at EMU, 2(4). Retrieved from http://commons.emich.edu/sotl/vol2/iss1/4/

  • Huber, B. J. (2010). Does participation in multiple high impact practices affect student success at Cal State Northridge? Some preliminary insights. Northridge: Office of Institutional Research, California State University Northridge. Retrieved from http://www.csun.edu/sites/default/files/MultHIPOverviewFinal.pdf

  • Kelly, K. A. (2009). A yearlong general education course using “reacting to the past” pedagogy to explore democratic practice. International Journal of Learning, 16(11), 147–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., Cruce, T. M., Shoup, R., Kinzie, J., & Gonyea, R. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuh, G. D., & Schneider, C. G. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who accesses them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazrus, P. K., & McKay, G. K. (2013). The reacting to the past pedagogy and engaging the first-year student. In J. E. Groccia & L. Cruz (Eds.), To improve the academy: Resources for faculty, instructional, and organizational development (Vol. 31, pp. 351–363). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lightcap, T. (2009). Creating political order: Maintaining student engagement through reacting to the past. PS: Political Science and Politics, 42, 175–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lidinsky, A. (2014). “Reacting to the past” to be proactive in the present: Feminist roots of high-impact practices. Feminist Teacher, 24(3), 208–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middle Tennessee State University. (n.d.). Quest for student success 2013–2016: A comprehensive, strategic initiative designed to improve retention and completion rates. Retrieved from http://www.mtsu.edu/docs/QuestforStudentSuccess.pdf

  • Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Planning, and Research, Middle Tennessee State University. (n.d.). 2015 fact book: Middle Tennessee State University. Retrieved from http://www.mtsu.edu/iepr/factbook/factbook_2015.pdf

  • Olwell, R., & Stevens, A. (2015). “I had to double check my thoughts”: How the reacting to the past methodology impacts first-year college student engagement, retention, and historical thinking. The History Teacher, 48(3), 561–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, S. R. (2000). Student responses to activities designed to develop generic professional skills. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 126(4), 180–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason, R. D. (2009). An examination of persistence research through the lens of a comprehensive conceptual framework. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 659–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

figure a
figure b
figure c
figure d
figure e
figure f
figure g
figure h
figure i

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McCormack, D., Petersen, K.K. (2018). Impact and Perception: Reacting to the Past at Middle Tennessee State University. In: Watson, C., Hagood, T. (eds) Playing to Learn with Reacting to the Past. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61747-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61747-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61746-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61747-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics