Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The March, 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Disaster – A Foreseeable System Accident?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Asia-Pacific Security Challenges

Abstract

The chapter presents a systems-theory-informed analysis of the 11 March 2011 Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster. Following the Tōhoku earthquake, Fukushima-Daiichi suffered a series of failures that saw nuclear material released into the environment and the evacuation of 150,000 residents. Using a formula developed by Rose Challenger, Christopher Clegg and Mark Robinson (Understanding crowd behaviours, vol. 1. Practical guidance and lessons identified. The Stationery Office, London, 2010), the chapter argues that the disaster was a system accident originating in a spectrum of factors – social, economic, political and cultural. Secondly, the chapter argues that the disaster was foreseeable. Thirdly, the chapter argues that the mindlessness and groupthink that permeated Japan’s industrial, bureaucratic and political elites increased the likelihood of disaster. As to how a repeat can be avoided, the chapter offers three options. First, the world community could try to persuade Japan to abandon its nuclear programme. Secondly, Japan could generate her electricity entirely from fossil fuels and renewables such as solar, wind, hydro, tide and biomass. Thirdly, Japan could seed her nuclear plants with managers and workers not culturally predisposed to conformity and obedience. The author concludes that each solution is problematic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Airline Business (1998) Cockpit culture change. Available at: https://www.flightglobal.com/news/articles/cockpit-culture-change-40984/. Accessed 29 Jan 2017

  • Ambrose SE (1985) Rise to globalism. American foreign policy since 1938. Penguin Books, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck U (1992) Risk society, towards a new modernity. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett SA (2016) Demonisation as explanation? A systems theory-informed analysis of the origins of, and reaction to the 1946 Burnden Park and 1989 Hillsborough football stadium disasters. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.12.013

  • Black J, Koopman P (2009) System safety as an emergent property in composite systems. Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Callon M, Latour B (1981) Unscrewing the big leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In: Advances in social theory and methodology: towards an integration of micro and macro-sociology. Routledge, London, pp 277–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon M, Law J (1997) After the individual in society: lessons on collectivity from science, technology and society. Can J Sociol 22(2):165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Challenger R, Clegg CW, Robinson M (2010) Understanding crowd behaviours, Practical guidance and lessons identified, vol 1. The Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Columbia University (2009) Japan’s Modern History: An Outline of the Period. Available at: http://afe.easia.columbia.edu/timelines/japan_modern_timeline.htm/. Accessed 27 Dec 2016

  • De Laurentis D (2005) Understanding Transportation as system-of-system design problem, 43d AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibition

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker S (2006) Resilience engineering: chronicling the emergence of confused consensus. In: Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts, Ashgate Publishing Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekker, S. (2014), The field guide to Understanding ‘Human Error’ (3rd ed.), Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Farnham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorner D (1996) The logic of failure: Recognising and avoiding error in complex situations. Perseus Books, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Fioravanti C, Velho L (2010) Let’s follow the actors! Does actor-network theory have anything to contribute to science journalism? J Sci Commun 9(4):A02

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin TGC, Young MS, Stanton NA (2015) Human factors models for aviation accident analysis and prevention. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich RL (1999) Building safety on the three cultures of aviation. In: Proceedings of the IATA human factors seminar. Bangkok, Thailand, August 12, 1998, pp 39–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmreich RL, Merritt A (2001) Culture at work in aviation and medicine. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden RJ (2009) People or systems? To blame is human. The fix is to engineer. Prof Saf 54(12):34–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollnagel E (2004) Barriers and accident prevention. Ashgate Publishing Ltd, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Janis IL (1972) Victims of groupthink: a psychological study of foreign-policy decisions and fiascoes. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson CW (2005) What are emergent properties and how do they affect the engineering of complex systems? University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Department of Computing Science

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingston J (2012) Japan’s nuclear village. Asia Pac J 10(37-1):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagadec P (1982) Major technical risk: an assessment of industrial disasters. Pergamon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPorte TR, Consolini P (1991) Working in practice but not in theory: theoretical challenges of high-reliability organisations. J Public Adm Res Theory 1:19–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier MW (1998) Architecting principles for systems of systems. Syst Eng NY 1(4):267–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten D (2004) The impact of the risk society thesis on environmental politics and management in a globalizing economy – principles, proficiency, perspectives. J Risk Res 7(4):377–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurino DE, Reason JT, Johnston N, Lee R (1998) Beyond aviation human factors. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre GR (2000) Patterns in safety thinking. Ashgate, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller KD (2009) Organisational risk after modernism. Organ Stud 30(2–3):157–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteiro E (2012) Actor-network theory and information infrastructure. Available at: http://www.idi.ntnu.no/~eriem/ant.FINAL.htm. Accessed 1 Mar 2016

  • National Transportation Safety Board (2000) Aircraft accident report. Controlled Flight Into Terrain. Korean Air Flight 801. Boeing 747–300, HL7468, Nimitz Hill, Guam. August 6, 1997. National Transportation Safety Board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (1983) The organizational context of human factors engineering. Adm Sci Q 28(4):521–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollmann, M (2016) Japan: how energy security shapes foreign policy. Available at: http://thediplomat.com/. Accessed 26 Dec 2016

  • Rasmussen J (1997) Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf Sci 27:183–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen J (1999) The concept of human error: is it useful for the design of safe systems? Saf Sci Monit 3

    Google Scholar 

  • Reason JT (2013) A life in error. Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts KH (1990) Some characteristics of one type of high reliability organisation. Organ Sci 1(2):160–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorrock S, Leonhardt J, Licu T, Peters C (2014) Systems thinking for safety: ten principles. Eurocontrol, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Taleb NN (2010) The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable, 2nd edn. Penguin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • The National Diet of Japan (2012) The official report of the Fukushima nuclear accident independent investigation commission, Executive summary. The National Diet of Japan, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Titov VV, Synolakis CE (1997) Extreme inundation flows during the Hokkaido-Nansei-Oki tsunami. Geophys Res Lett 24(11):1315–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toft B, Reynolds S (1997) Learning from disasters. Perpetuity Press, Leicester

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BA (1994) Causes of disaster, sloppy management. Br J Manag 5(3):215–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe KM, Obstfeld D (1999) Organising for high reliability: processes of collective mindfulness. Res Organ Behav 21:81–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood A (1999) Korean air – safety fears. BBC News 11 July

    Google Scholar 

  • World Nuclear Association (2016) Fukushima Accident. Available at: http://www.worldnuclear.org/informationlibrary/safetyandsecurity/safetyofplants/fukushimaaccident.aspx/. Accessed 14 Aug 2016

  • World Nuclear News (2012) New Japanese regulator takes over. Available at: http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/. Accessed 17 Jan 2017

  • Yamamori H, Mito T (1993) Keeping CRM is keeping the flight safe. In: Wiener EL, Kanki BG, Helmreich RL (eds) Cockpit resource management. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 399–420

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Safety and Security Unit, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

    Simon Bennett

Authors
  1. Simon Bennett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Bennett .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom

    Anthony J. Masys

  2. National Police Agency, China

    Leo S.F. Lin

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bennett, S. (2018). The March, 2011 Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Disaster – A Foreseeable System Accident?. In: Masys, A., Lin, L. (eds) Asia-Pacific Security Challenges. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61729-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation