Skip to main content

Abstract

The Rapid Assessment for Developmental Disabilities (RADD) was developed to address the challenges of measuring cognition in individuals with intellectual disabilities (ID). As opposed to individuals with ID, commonly used intelligence tests such as the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC) [1], the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales (WAIS) [2], and the Stanford-Binet (SB) [3] were designed for use with the general population [4]. By design on these measures approximately 95% of the population have IQ scores that fall within two standard deviations (SD) from the mean (scores between 70 and 130; Fig. 12.1). Individuals with ID typically have IQ scores more than two SDs from the mean and they represent less than 2.5% of the total population, forming a statistically rare group. Commonly used intelligence tests were not designed to differentiate between the varying levels of ability among individuals at this lowest end of the intelligence spectrum. The RADD was developed to fill the need for measuring the cognitive abilities of individuals with IQ scores more than two standard deviations below the mean (scores below 70).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wechsler D. Wechsler intelligence scale for children. 3rd ed. San Antonio: Harcourt Brace and Company; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale. 3rd ed. San Antonio: Harcourt Brace and Company; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Thorndike RL, Hagen EP, Sattler JM. Stanford binet intelligence scale. 4th ed. Chicago: Riverside Publishing; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rabin LA, Barr WB, Burton LA. Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United States and Canada: a survey of INS, NAN, and APA division 40 members. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005;20:33–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Borthwick-Duffy SA. Epidemiology and prevalence of psychopathology in people with mental retardation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1994;62:17–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sattler JM. Assessment of children, revised and updated. 3rd ed. San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler Publishing; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sattler JM. Assessment of children: cognitive applications. 4th ed. San Diego: Jerome M. Sattler Publisher; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  8. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lezak MD. Neuropsychological assessment. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Slosson RL. Technical manual. Slosson intelligence test. New York: Slosson Educational Publications; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kaufman AS, Kaufman NL. Manual for the Kaufman brief intelligence test. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state. J Psych Res. 1975;12:189–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Harrell LE, Marson D, Chatterjee A, et al. The severe mini-mental state examination for the bedside assessment of severely impaired patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 2000;14:168–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gardner MF. Expressive one-word picture vocabulary test—revised manual. Novato: Academic Therapy Publications; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dunn LM, Dunn LM. Peabody picture vocabulary test—revised manual for forms L and M. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Stutsman R. Guide for administering the Merrill-Palmer scale of mental tests. Chicago: Stoelting Company; 1948.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Parks S. Curriculum-based assessment birth to three years: adapted from the Hawaii early learning profile. Palo Alto: VORT Corporation; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Walsh DM, Finwall J, McGregor M, et al. Rapid assessment of severe cognitive impairment in individuals with developmental disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2007;51:91–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Walsh DM, Doran E, Silverman W, et al. Rapid assessment of cognitive function in Down syndrome across intellectual level and dementia status. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2015;59:1071–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. World Health Organisation. The ICD-10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dalton A. Dyspraxia scale for adults with Down syndrome. Staten Island: Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Panisset M, Roudier M, Saxton J, et al. Severe impairment battery: a neuropsychological test for severely demented patients. Arch Neurol. 1994;51:41–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Evenhuis HM. Further evaluation of the dementia questionnaire for persons with mental retardation (DMR). J Intellect Disabil Res. 1996;40:369–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Evenhuis HM. Evaluation of a screening instrument for dementia in ageing mentally retarded persons. J Intellect Disabil Res. 1992;36:337–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zweig MH, Campbell G. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: a fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clin Chem. 1993;39:561–77.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bucks RS, Ashworth DL, Wilcock GK, et al. Assessment of activities of daily living in dementia: development of the Bristol activities of daily living scale. Age Ageing. 1996;25:113–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Krinsky-McHale SJ, Silverman W. Dementia and mild cognitive impairment in adults with intellectual disability: issues of diagnosis. Dev Disabl Res Rev. 2013;18:31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Elliott-King J, Shaw S, Bandelow S, et al. A critical literature review of the effectiveness of various instruments in the diagnosis of dementia in adults with intellectual disabilities. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2016;4:126–48.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Janicki MP, Keller SM. Why do we need national guidelines for adults with intellectual disability and dementia? Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015;1:325–7.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sabbagh M, Edgin J. Clinical assessment of cognitive decline in adults with Down syndrome. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2016;13:30–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Burt DB, Primeaux-Hart S, Loveland KA, et al. Comparing dementia diagnostic methods used with people with intellectual disabilities. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2015;2:94–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Burt DB, Primeaux-Hart S, Loveland KA, et al. Tests and medical conditions associated with dementia diagnosis. J Policy Pract Intellect Disabil. 2005;2:47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Silverman W, Schupf N, Zigman W, et al. Dementia in adults with mental retardation: assessment at a single point in time. Am J Ment Retard. 2004;109:111–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Burt DB. Issues in dementia assessment methods. In: Prasher VP, editor. Neuropsychological assessment of dementia in Down syndrome and intellectual disabilities. London: Springer; 2009. p. 19–38.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Kay DW, Tyrer SP, Margallo-Lana ML, et al. Preliminary evaluation of a scale to assess cognitive function in adults with Down’s syndrome: the Prudhoe cognitive function test. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2003;47:155–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Deb S, Braganza J. Comparison of rating scales for the diagnosis of dementia in adults with Down’s syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res. 1999;43:400–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hon J, Huppert FA, Holland AJ, et al. Neuropsychological assessment of older adults with Down's syndrome: an epidemiological study using the Cambridge cognitive examination (CAMCOG). Br J Clin Psychol. 1999;38:155–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kirk LJ, Hick R, Laraway A. Assessing dementia in people with learning disabilities: the relationship between two screening measures. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006;10:357–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Solomon PR, Hirschoff A, Kelly B, et al. A 7 minute neurocognitive screening battery highly sensitive to Alzheimer’s disease. Arch Neurol. 1988;55:349–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Edgin JO, Mason GM, Allman MJ, et al. Development and validation of the Arizona cognitive test battery for Down syndrome. J Neurodev Disord. 2010;2:149–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Breslin J, Spanò G, Bootzin R, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome and cognition in Down syndrome. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56:657–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Visootsak J, Huddleston L, Buterbaugh A, et al. Influence of CHDs on psycho-social and neurodevelopmental outcomes in children with Down syndrome. Cardiol Young. 2016;26:250–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Hithersay R, Hamburg S, Knight B, et al. Cognitive decline and dementia in Down syndrome. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2016;30:102–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Esbensen AJ, Johnson EB, Amaral JL, et al. Differentiating aging among adults with Down syndrome and comorbid dementia or psychopathology. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2016;121:13–24.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Wesnes KA, Edgar CJ. The role of human cognitive neuroscience in drug discovery for the dementias. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2014;14:62–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kozauer N, Katz R. Regulatory innovation and drug development for early-stage Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:1169–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Ferris SH, Lucca U, Mohs R, et al. Objective psychometric tests in clinical trials of dementia drugs. Position paper from the International working group on harmonization of dementia drug guidelines. Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord. 1997;11(Suppl 3):34–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. McCabe LL, McCabe ERB. Personalized medicine for individuals with Down syndrome. Mol Genet Metab. 2011;104:7–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The US National Institutes of Health supported this study through the following grants: P50AG16573; R01AG 21912; R01HD065160; U01AG051412. The National Center for Research Resources and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences supported this study through Grant UL1 TR000153.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ira T. Lott MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hom, C.L., Walsh, D.M., Doran, E., Lott, I.T. (2018). The Rapid Assessment for Developmental Disabilities. In: Prasher, V. (eds) Neuropsychological Assessments of Dementia in Down Syndrome and Intellectual Disabilities. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61720-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61720-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61719-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61720-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics