Skip to main content

Background to the Eugenics Movement and Influences on Friedrich Hayek

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Hayek: A Collaborative Biography

Part of the book series: Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics ((AIEE))

Abstract

Friedrich Hayek was against eugenics and the eugenics movement. Although from childhood he was familiar with the concepts of Darwinism and sometimes stated the Nordic superiority and anti-Semitic sentiments found among many Anglo-Germanic professionals and the educated middle and upper-middle classes during the first half of the twentieth century. However, British colleagues who were leaders in the eugenics movement influenced Hayek’s theory of the natural selection of groups and of central planning in a socialistic system. But, Hayek was against eugenics practices as illustrated by his opposition to state-controlled central planning and social engineering programs which included eugenics. He believed governmental social engineering could potentially lead to a totalitarian society and the lack of individual freedom through eugenic mandates as found under Nazism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Eugenics was practiced in many countries and not just in Europe and the Americas. Japan, like Nazi Germany, had an emphasis on ‘racial purity.’ The focus of this chapter will be on American, British, and German eugenics as Friedrich Hayek likely was familiar with the literature and had colleagues from these cultures. See Robertson (2002); Turda and Gillette (2014); Turda (2010); Turda and Weindling (2007); and also Whitney (1934, 139).

  2. 2.

    A clean living movement is a period of time when a surge of health reform crusades, many with moral overtones, erupts into the popular consciousness (Engs 1991, 1; 2001; 2003, ix–x).

  3. 3.

    See also Donald Pickens (1968) for a detailed account of the eugenics movement during the Progressive era in the United States.

  4. 4.

    These and other terms that might be offensive in today’s culture were considered proper scientific nomenclature in the first half of the twentieth century.

  5. 5.

    The term ‘race’ had many meanings in the early twentieth century—it could mean ‘her race,’ woman as opposed to man; the classical Caucasian, Oriental, or Negroid races; the five races of Europe; or even the Irish race. See Huxley and Haddon (1936, 215–216).

  6. 6.

    See also Saleeby (1914, 19–20, 31).

  7. 7.

    The contests encouraged mothers to improve the health of their children so their babies would be prizewinners at local and state agricultural fairs. See Dorey (1999); Holt (1995).

  8. 8.

    Saleeby (1914, 18, 31, 112) also coined the term racial poisons. See also Searle (1976).

  9. 9.

    Also see Saleeby (1911, 256–259).

  10. 10.

    See Dowbiggin (2003), Harris (2010), Turda (2010), Turda and Gillette (2014), and Turda and Weindling (2007) for more information on other international eugenics programs and public policies.

  11. 11.

    See Darwin (1859), Jordanova (1984), and Degler (1991) for further information.

  12. 12.

    See Corsi (1988), Jordanova (1984), Saleeby (1909, 205–253) for more information.

  13. 13.

    See Edelson (1999) and Henig (2000) for more information on Mendel and his theory.

  14. 14.

    See Bannister (1989), Degler (1991), Hawkins (1997), and Hofstadter (1986) for additional material concerning Social Darwinism.

  15. 15.

    See Engs (2005, 120–122), Haller (1963, 163–167), Ludmerer (1972a, 77–80).

  16. 16.

    For a sample of publications that support inheritance of intelligence between social economic classes and/or race, see Jensen (1969), Herrnstein and Murray (1996), Lynn (2006), and Lynn and Vanhanen (2002). For examples that refute the inheritance of intelligence due to race and/or class, see Alland (2004), Jacoby and Glauberman (1995), Kerr and Shakespeare (2002), and Kincheloe et al. (1997). See also Gould, 1981 who traces the history of intelligence measurements and Chomsky (1978) and his other works concerning language, intelligence, and race.

  17. 17.

    Also translated as ‘Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races’ (1856).

  18. 18.

    For further information on race, see Barkan (1992), Coon (1971), and Marks (1995).

  19. 19.

    See also Engs (2005, 5–7; 2014); Haller 1984; Ludmerer (1972a, 34–35); Pickens 1968.

  20. 20.

    An early study before Davenport was Richard Dugdale’s The Jukes (1877). Davenport’s research influenced other family studies including the Kallikats (1912), the Nams (1912), and The Jukes in 1915 (1916). The Mongrel Virginians (1926) was the only study of a mixed race group. Several states also conducted a series of reports including Mental Defectives in Indiana (1916–1922) and the Eugenics Survey of Vermont (1924–1936). See also Rafter (1988); Paul (1995); Gallagher (1999) for further information concerning family history studies.

  21. 21.

    Charles Davenport, Alexander Graham Bell, Harvard University President Charles Eliot, David Starr Jordan, and conservationist Gifford Pinchot were vice presidents. Henry Fairfield Osborn, Madison Grant, and several biologists were delegates. See Problems in Eugenics, Report of Proceedings of the First International Eugenics Congress, University of London, from July 24 to 30, 1912. https://archive.org/details/b28105874. Accessed 3 August, 2016.

  22. 22.

    Founders and early members included leading nativists, non-nativists, eugenicists: Irving Fisher (was its first chair), Madison Grant, Harry H. Laughlin, Henry Fairfield Osborn, Roswell H. Johnson, Ellsworth Huntington, Charles Davenport, Henry Perkins, and other prominent academics and philanthropists were members (Mehler 1988, 81).

  23. 23.

    See Lombardo 2008 for more information about this famous case.

  24. 24.

    See also Carlson (2001), and Whitney (1934, 135–138).

  25. 25.

    See Grant (1916, 80–82), Stoddard (1920, 261–262), and see also Ludmerer (1972a, 24–26).

  26. 26.

    See Grant 1916, insert between pp. 122–123.

  27. 27.

    See Carlson (2001), Engs (2005 123–125), Glad (2011, 6), Kraut (1994), Markel (1997).

  28. 28.

    See Engs (2014), Hall (1906, 84–85), Kraut (1994, 50–77), Ludmerer (1972a, b), Martin 2011, 139), and Reimers (1998, 10–19) for more details about immigration restriction legislation which was intertwined with public health, nativist, and eugenic concerns.

  29. 29.

    See Hall (1906, 86), Martin (2011, 132–151), Haller ([1963]1984, 155–156), Mehler (1988, 2), Ludmerer (1972b, 61–65). Also see https://history.state.gov/milestones/1921-1936/immigration-act. Accessed on 4 July 2016. For further details about the immigration restriction movement and its interlinking with eugenics, see Engs (2014), Ludmerer (1972b).

  30. 30.

    See Farrall (1985), Saleeby (1909, 1914), Searle (1976), Soloway (1990) for further information concerning the British eugenics movement.

  31. 31.

    See https://www.scribd.com/doc/97123506/Eugenics-Society-Members-A-Z-2012 for members list. Accessed on 24 July 2016.

  32. 32.

    Economist J.M. Keynes was a director (1937–1944) and V.P. 1937 of the society; A.M. Carr-Saunders was the president (1949–1953) and Julian Huxley (V.P. 1937–1944, Pres. 1959–1962). See annual membership lists from Eugenics Review published by the Eugenics Society (1930–1950).

  33. 33.

    Galton lectures were also given by Carr-Saunders (1935), Huxley (1936), Keynes (1937), and Beveridge (1943). See Galton Lecturers list (1968).

  34. 34.

    Eugenics Society 1930–1950; Kühl, S. to R. Engs (15 June 2016). List of people attending European eugenics or population conferences. Private communication via email.

  35. 35.

    See Kühl (1994, 2013), Turda and Weindling (2007), Weindling (2007, 1989), Weingart (1989), and Weiss (1986, 1987a, b) for more information pertaining to the German eugenics movement.

  36. 36.

    Per convention Rassenhygiene and eugenics will be used interchangeably.

  37. 37.

    See also Kühl (2013), Weindling (1989), and Weingart (1989).

  38. 38.

    See also Weiss (1987b, 227–228).

  39. 39.

    This program to breed a master race ran from December 1935 to about 1945. See Clay and Leapman (1995) and Henry and Hillel (1976).

  40. 40.

    See also Haller (1984, xi).

  41. 41.

    Detailed biographical information can be found in biographies by Cubitt (2006), Ebenstein (2001, 2003) in addition to Hayek on Hayek (1994a), a work based upon interviews with Hayek later in his life.

  42. 42.

    See Leeson (2015b, 22–23, 94), c, 66–69) for further details concerning Hayek’s family pedigree and Nazi leanings.

  43. 43.

    Kresge (1994, 7) explains that in New York, while reading accounts of the Great War, he realized that ‘the truth about the course of the war had been largely kept from the Austrian people. We can date Hayek’s skepticism toward the actions and motives of governments from this point.’

  44. 44.

    Later after the war, Hayek moved to the United States (1951–1961) and was at the University of Chicago Committee on Social Thought. He then went to Freiburg in Breisgau, Germany, as a professor and had several visiting professorships. In 1974, he was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences and ended his career in Freiburg where he died. See works by Cubitt (2006), Ebenstein (2001, 2003), Leeson (2013, 2015a, b, c), and Hayek’s (1994a) interview autobiography.

  45. 45.

    von Hayek, F.A. Freedom and the Economic System. The Contemporary Review. 1938. January 153: 434–442.

  46. 46.

    See O’Connor, Lydia, and Daniel Marans. Here are ten examples of Donald Trump being a racist. The Huffington Post. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/donald-trump-racist-examples_us_56d47177e4b03260bf777e83. Accessed 4 July 2016; D’Antonio, Michael. Is Donald Trump Racist? Here’s What the Record Shows. 7 June 2016. Fortune. http://fortune.com/2016/06/07/donald-trump-racism-quotes/ Accessed 7 August 2016.

    Jessica Schulberg argues that Trump’s Neo-Nazi and Jewish backers are both convinced he’s secretly on their side which works out great for him. The Huffington Post. 27 May 2016. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-neo-nazis-jews_us_5747397be4b0dacf7ad4480e. Accessed 22 July 2016.

  47. 47.

    Friedrich Hayek, interviewed by Robert Chitester, date unspecified 1978 (Center for Oral History Research, University of California, Los Angeles, http://oralhistory.library.ucla.edu/). Accessed 19 October 2016.

  48. 48.

    Leeson 2015a, 168. fn. 57. See essay by von Kuehnelt-Leddihn, Erik. Hebrews and Christians. The Rothbard-Rockwell Report Archives. April 1998, 6–12. http://www.unz.org/pub/rothbardrockwellreport-1998apr-00006, Accessed 19 October, 2016; Also Childe (1926), Grant (1916), Günther (1927), Stoddard (1920).

  49. 49.

    Friedrich Hayek, interviewed by Robert Chitester, date unspecified 1978 (Center for Oral History Research, University of California, Los Angeles, http://oralhistory.library.ucla.edu/). Accessed 19 October 2016.

  50. 50.

    Friedrich Hayek, interviewed by Robert Chitester, date unspecified 1978 (Center for Oral History Research, University of California, Los Angeles, http://oralhistory.library.ucla.edu/). Cited in Leeson 2015a, 65 fn. 25. See also Leeson 2015b, 15–16.

  51. 51.

    See Leeson 2015a, 19, 23, fn. 37.

  52. 52.

    See Caldwell (2004, 2) for details concerning this intellectual change in direction.

  53. 53.

    The complete quote by Carr-Saunders in The Population Problem (1922, 223):

    Now men and groups are naturally selected on account of the customs they practice just as they are selected on account of their mental and physical characters. Those groups practicing the most advantageous customs will have an advantage in the constant struggle between adjacent groups over those that practice less advantageous customs. Few customs can be more advantageous than those which limit the numbers of a group to the desirable number, and there is no difficulty in understanding how—once any of these three customs [abortion, infanticide, abstention from intercourse] had originated it would, by as process of natural selection come to be so practiced that it would produce an approximation to the desirable number.

  54. 54.

    See Clay and Leapman (1995) and Henry and Hillel (1976) concerning the Lebensborn program.

  55. 55.

    A few more paragraphs were added to the 1932 and 1936 editions. See von Mises, Preface 1981 (xvi; xxiv).

  56. 56.

    The epilogue was originally published as Planned Chaos (1947, 1970). Irvington-on-Hudson, NY: Foundation for Economic Education.

  57. 57.

    See von Mises ([1936]1969, 578–582), epilogue Section 8, ‘Nazism,’ for more information on totalitarianism and eugenics as an aspect of this political economic system.

  58. 58.

    See also Hayek (1967, 216–217).

  59. 59.

    Although I primarily used the original published paper copies, many items published prior to 1923 can be found in Hathitrust.org

Bibliography

Although I primarily used the original published paper copies, many items published prior to 1923 can be found in Hathitrust.org

  • Alland, A. 2004. Race in Mind: Race, IQ, and Other Racisms. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, G. E. 2011. Eugenics and Modern Biology: Critiques of Eugenics, 1910–1945. Annals of Human Genetics 75: 314–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.2011.00649.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angner, E. 2002. The History of Hayek’s Theory of Cultural Evolution. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 33.4, December: 695–718. http://mason.gmu.edu/~eangner/pdf/hayekcarrsaunders.pdf. Accessed June 10, 2016.

  • Angner, E. 2007. Hayek and Natural Law. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bannister, R. 1989. Social Darwinism: Science and Myth in Anglo-American Social Thought. Philadelphia: Temple University Press [1979]1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkan, E. 1992. The Retreat of Scientific Racism. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, B. 2004. Hayek’s Challenge: An Intellectual Biography of F.A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, E. A. 2001. The Unfit: A History of a Bad Idea. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr-Saunders, A. M. 1926. Eugenics. New York: Henry Holt and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr-Saunders, A. M. 1922. The Population Problem: A Study in Human Evolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V. G. 1926. The Aryans: A Study of Indo-European Origins. London: Williams and Norgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 1978. Language Development, Human Intelligence, and Social Organization. In Feinberg, W. (Ed.) National Institute of Education (U.S.). Educational Equity Group. University of Illinois Press: 163–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Coon, C. S. 1971. The Origin of Races. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clay, C. and Leapman, M. 1995. Master Race: the Lebensborn Experiment in Nazi Germany. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corsi, P. 1988. The Age of Lamarck: Evolutionary Theories in France, 1790–1830. Berkeley: University of California Press. Translator Jonathon Mandelbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, D. M. 2008. The Holocaust: Roots, History, and Aftermath. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubitt, C. E. 2006. A Life of Friedrich August Von Hayek. Bedfordshire, UK: Authors Online Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1859 [1869, 5th ed.]. On the Origin of the Species by Natural Selection. London: John Murray. https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/008593625

  • Darwin, L. 1916. On the Statistical Studies Needed after the War in Connection with Eugenics. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 79.2, March: 159–188. http://www.jstor.org.proxyiub.uits.iu.edu/stable/2340813. Accessed 3 August 2016.

  • Davenport, C. B. 1929. Do Races Differ in Mental Capacity? Human Biology 1.1, January: 70–89. Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41446972. Accessed 11 July 2016.

  • Davenport, C. B. 1911. Heredity in Relation to Eugenics. New York: H. Holt and Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Degler, C. 1991. In Search of Human Nature: The Decline and Revival of Darwinism in American Social Thought. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorey, A. K. V. 1999. Better Baby Contests: The Scientific Quest for Perfect Childhood Health in the Early Twentieth Century. Jefferson, NC: McFarland

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowbiggin, I. R. 2003. Keeping America Sane: Psychiatry and Eugenics in the United States and Canada 1880–1940. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebenstein, A. O. 2003. Hayek’s Journey: The Mind of Friedrich Hayek. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenstein, A. O. 2001. Friedrich Hayek: A Biography. New York: Palgrave for St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, E. 1999. Gregor Mendel: And the Roots of Genetics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engs, R. C. 2014. Eugenics, Immigration Restrictions and the Birth Control Movements (Chap. 16). In Sibley, K. A. S. (Ed.) A Companion to Warren G. Harding, Calvin Coolidge and Herbert Hoover. Oxford: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.: 313–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engs, R. C. 2005. The Eugenics Movement: An Encyclopedia. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engs, R. C. 2003. The Progressive Era’s Health Reform Movement: A Historical Dictionary. Westfield, CT: Praeger Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engs, R. C. 2000; 2001. Clean Living Movement: American Cycles of Health Reform. Westfield, CT: Praeger Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engs, R. C. 1991. Resurgence of a New Clean Living Movement. Journal of School Health 61.4, April: 155–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. and Simonsen, E. (Eds.) 2005. Children of World War II: the Hidden Enemy Legacy. Oxford, UK: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eugenics Society. 1930–1950. List of fellows and members of the Eugenics Society. Eugenics Review. Both paper journal and online. For example 1934. Wellcome Library. http://library.wellcome.ac.uk/player/b16231508. Accessed June 12, 2016.

  • Farrall, L. A. 1985 [1970]. The Origins and Growth of the English Eugenics Movement, 1865–1925. New York: Garland Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrant, A. 2008. The “Vanity of the Philosopher” Analytical Egalitarianism, Associatonist Psychology, and Eugenic Remaking? In Moss, L. (Ed.) Social Inequality, Analytical Egalitarianism and the March Towards Eugenic Explanations in the Social Sciences. Chitchester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, I. 1921. Impending problem of eugenics. The Scientific Monthly 13.3: 214–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, I. 1910. National Vitality: Its Wastes and Conservation; Extract from Report of the National Conservation Commission. Washington: Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, I. 1976 [1909]. National Vitality, Its Wastes and Conservation. New York: Arno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, N. L. 1999. Breeding Better Vermonters: The Eugenics Project in the Green Mountain State. Hanover, NY: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. 1909. Essays in Eugenics. London: The Eugenics Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galton, F. 1904. Eugenics: Its Definition, Scope, and Aims. The American Journal of Sociology 10.1, July: 1–25. http://galton.org/essays/1900-1911/galton-1904-am-journ-soc-eugenics-scope-aims.htm. Accessed June 28, 2016.

  • Galton, F. 1883. Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development. New York: Macmillan & Co. www.hathitrust.org. Accessed 10 July 2016.

  • Galton, F. 1869. Hereditary Genius: An Inquiry into Its Laws and Consequences. London: Macmillan and Co. www.hathitrust.org. Accessed 10 July 2016.

  • Glad, J. 2011. Jewish Eugenics. Washington: Wooden Shore, LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobineau, J. de. H. H. (Ed.) 1926 [1856]. Moral and Intellectual Diversity of RacesFrom the French. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott. https://books.google.com/books?id=cx9mAAAAMAAJ. Accessed 2 August 2016.

  • Gosney, E. S. and Popenoe, P. 1929. Sterilization for Human Betterment; A Summary of Results of 6,000 Operations in California, 1909–1929. New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, M. 1916. The Passing of the Great Race; Or, The Racial Basis of European History. New York: C. Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. 1981. The Mismeasure of Man. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Günther, H. 1927. The Racial Elements of European History. [Rassenkunde Europas. 1925] London: Methuen & Co. Ltd. Translator G. C. Wheeler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, M. 1916. Being Well-Born: An Introduction to Eugenics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. F. 1906. Immigration and Its Effects upon the United States. New York: Henry Holt and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haller, M. H. 1984 [1963]. Eugenics: Hereditarian Attitudes in American Thought. Rutgers: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamowy, R. 2002. A Note on Hayek and Anti-Semitism. History of Political Economy 34.1: 255–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. 2010. Eugenics and the Firewall: Canada’s Nasty Little Secret. Winnipeg: J.G. Shillingford Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkin, M. 1997. Social Darwinism in European and American Thought 1860–1945, Nature as Model and Nature as Threat. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1944. The Road to Serfdom. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1952. The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1967. Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1973. Law Legislation and Liberty, Volume I. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1976. Law Legislation and Liberty, Volume II. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1979. Law Legislation and Liberty, Volume III. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1988. The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1994a. Hayek on Hayek: An Autobiographical Dialogue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by Stephen Kresge and Leif Wenar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hayek, F. A. 1994b. The Road to Serfdom: Fiftieth Anniversary Edition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henig, R. M. 2000. The Monk in the Garden: The Lost and Found Genius of Gregor Mendel, the Father of Genetics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry, C. and Hillel, M. 1976. Children of the SS. London: Hutchinson. Translator Erik Mosbacher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. and Murray, C. 1996. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham, J. 1955. Strangers in the Land: Patterns of American Nativism, 1860–1925. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrandt, S. 2013. Wolfgang Bargmann (1906–1978) and Heinrich von Hayek (1900–1969): Careers in Anatomy Continuing Through German National Socialism to Postwar Leadership. Annals of Anatomy 195.4, July: 283–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter, R. 1986. The Progressive Movement: 1900–1915. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, M. I. 1995. Linoleum, Better Babies, and the Modern Farm Woman, 1890–1930. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J. S. and Haddon, A. C., with a contribution by Carr-Saunders, A. M. 1936. We Europeans; A Survey of ‘Racial’ Problems. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Arthur R. 1969. How Much Can We Boost IQ and Scholastic Achievement? Harvard Educational Review 39.1, April: 1–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, R. and Glauberman, N. 1995. The Bell Curve Debate: History, Documents, Opinions. New York: Times Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, D. S. 1902. Blood of the Nation: A Study of the Decay of Races through the Survival of the Unfit. Boston, MA: American Unitarian Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, D. S. 1911. The heredity of Richard Roe: a discussion of the principles of eugenics. Boston: American Unitarian Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordanova, L. J. 1984. Lamarck. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallis, A. A. 2007. Racial Politics and Biomedical Totalitarianism in Interwar Europe. In Turda, M. and Weindling, P. (Ed.) 2007. Blood and Homeland: Eugenics and Racial Nationalism in Central and Southeast Europe, 1900–1940. Budapest: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, A. and Shakespeare, T. 2002. Genetic Politics: From Eugenics to Genome. Cheltenham, England: New Clarion Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L, Steinberg, S. R., Gresson, A. D. III (Eds.) 1997. Measured Lies: The Bell Curve Examined. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, A. N. 1994. Silent Travelers: Germs, Genes, and the “Immigrant Menace.” New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kresge, S. 1994. Introduction. In Kresge, S. and Wenar, L. (Eds.) F. A. Hayek. Hayek on Hayek: An Autobiographical Dialogue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühl, S. 2013. For the Betterment of the Race: The Rise and Fall of the International Movement for Eugenics and Racial Hygiene. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Translator Lawrence Schofer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kühl, S. 1994. The Nazi Connection: Eugenics, American Racism, and German National Socialism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, M. 2013. The Genesis and Reception of the Road to Serfdom. In Lesson, R. (Ed.) Hayek: A Collaborative Biography. Part I Influences, from Mises to Bartley. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, H. H. 1922. Eugenical Sterilization in the United States: A Report of the Psychopathic Laboratory of the Municipal Court of Chicago. Chicago: Psychopathic Laboratory of the Municipal Court of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, R. (Ed.) 2013. Hayek: A Collaborative Biography: Part 1, Influences from Mises to Bartley. Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, R. (Ed.) 2015a. Hayek: A Collaborative Biography: Part III, Fraud, Fascism and Free Market Religion. Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, R. (Ed.) 2015b. Hayek: A Collaborative Biography: Part IV, England, the Ordinal Revolution and the Road to Serfdom, 1931–50. Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeson, R. (Ed.) 2015c. Hayek: A Collaborative Biography. Part V, Hayek’s Great Society of Free Men. Basingstoke, Hampshire, and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, T. 2003. Progressive Era Eugenics and Economics. History of Political Economy 35.4: 687–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lombardo, P. A. 2008. Three Generations, No Imbeciles: Eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck V. Bell. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludmerer, K M. 1972a. Genetics and American Society: A Historical Appraisal. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludmerer, K. M. 1972b. Genetics, Eugenics, and the Immigration Restriction Act of 1924. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 46: 59–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R. 2006. Race Differences in Intelligence: An Evolutionary Analysis. Augusta, GA: Washington Summit Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, R. and Vanhanen, T. 2002. IQ and the Wealth of Nations. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, J. 1993. Historiography of Eugenics. American Journal of Human Genetics 52: 650–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, J. 1995. Human Biodiversity: Genes, Race, and History. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markel, H. 1997. Quarantine! East European Jewish Immigrants and the New York City Epidemics of 1892. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. F. 2011. A Nation of Immigrants. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehler, B. A. 1988. A History of the American Eugenics Society, 1921–1940. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. http://www.ferris.edu/isar/dissertation.htm. Accessed 11 July 2016.

  • Osborn, H. F. 1924. The Approach to the Immigration Problem Through Science. An address delivered at the National Immigration Conference, New York City, December 13 and 14, 1923. Reprinted from Proceedings of the National Immigration Conference. New York: Report no. 26 of the National Industrial Conference Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, D. B. 1995. Controlling Human Heredity; 1865 to the Present. Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. and Moul, M. 1925. The Problem of Alien Immigration into Great Britain, Illustrated by an Examination of Russian and Polish Jewish Children. Annals of Eugenics 1: 5–55, 56–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peart, S. and D. M. Levy. 2005. TheVanity of the Philosopher’: From Equality to Hierarchy in Postclassical Economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pickens, D. K. 1968. Eugenics and the Progressives. Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, P. 1926. The Conservation of the Family. Baltimore: The Williams & Wilkins Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popenoe, P. and Johnson, R. H. 1922. Applied Eugenics. New York: The Macmillan Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. 2003 [1945]. The Open Society and Its Enemies: Volume One: The Spell of Plato. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafter, N. H. 1988. White Trash: The Eugenic Family Studies, 1877–1919. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reder, M. W. 2000. The Anti-Semitism of Some Eminent Economists. History of Political Economy 32.4: 833–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimers, D. M. 1998. Unwelcome Strangers: American Identity and the Turn against Immigration. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, J. 2002. Blood Talks: Eugenic Modernity and the Creation of New Japanese. History and Anthropology 13.3: 191–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W. J. 1922. Eugenics, Marriage and Birth Control [Practical Eugenics]. New York: The Critic and Guide Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roosevelt, T. 1905. On American Motherhood: A Speech Given in Washington, March 13, 1905, Before the National Congress of Mothers. http://www.nationalcenter.org/TRooseveltMotherhood.html. Accessed 24 June 2016.

  • Ross, E. A. 1901. The Causes of Race Superiority. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 18: 67–89. doi: 10.1177/000271620101800104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, P. H. and Gick, E. 2004. Hayek and Modern Evolutionary Theory. Evolutionary Psychology and Economic Theory Advances in Austrian Economics 7: 79–100. http://www.dartmouth.edu/~egick/rg.pdf. Accessed 15 June 2016.

  • Saleeby, C. W. 1909. Parenthood and Race Culture; an Outline of Eugenics. New York: Moffat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleeby, C. W. 1911. The methods of race-regeneration. New York: Moffat, Yard & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleeby, C. W. 1914. The Progress of Eugenics. New York, London: Funk & Wagnalls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, G. R. 1976. Eugenics and Politics in Britain, 1900–1914. Leyden: Noordhoff International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, H. 1864. The Principles of Biology, Volume 1. London: William and Norgate. https://books.google.com/books?id=SRkRAAAAYAAJ. Accessed 10 July 2016.

  • Spiro, J. P. 2009. Defending the Master Race: Conservation, Eugenics, and the Legacy of Madison Grant. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, A. M. 2005. Eugenic Nation: Faults and Frontiers of Better Breeding in Modern America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard, L. 1920. Rising Tide of Color Against White World Supremacy. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddard, L. 1922. Revolt against Civilization: The Menace of the Under Man United States. New York: C. Scribner’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turda, M. 2010. Modernism and Eugenics. Palgrave: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Turda, M. and Gillette, A. 2014. Latin Eugenics in Comparative Perspective. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turda, M. and Weindling, P. 2007. Blood and Homeland: Eugenics and Racial Nationalism in Central and Southeast Europe, 1900–1940. Budapest: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Mises, L. 1981. Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics. Translator J. Kahane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Mises, Ludwig. 1969 [1936]. Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis. London: J. Cape. Translator J. Kahane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weindling, P. 2007. In Turda, M. and Weindling, P. 2007. Blood and Homeland: Eugenics and Racial Nationalism in Central and Southeast Europe, 1900–1940. Budapest: Central European University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weindling, P. 1989. Health, Race and German Politics Between National Unification and Nazism 1870–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weingart, P. 1989. German Eugenics Between Science and Politics. Osiris 5: 260–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, S. F. 1987a. Race Hygiene and National Efficiency: The Eugenics of Wilhelm Schallmayer. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, S. F. 1987b. The Race Hygiene Movement in Germany. Osiris 3: 193–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, S. F. 1986. Wilhelm Schallmayer and the Logic of German Eugenics. Isis 77.286: 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, L. 1934. The Case for Sterilization. New York: Frederick A. Stokes Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiggam, A. 1924. The Fruit of the Family Tree. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Engs, R.C. (2017). Background to the Eugenics Movement and Influences on Friedrich Hayek. In: Hayek: A Collaborative Biography. Archival Insights into the Evolution of Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61714-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61714-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61713-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61714-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics