Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Media Logic and Its Impact on Political Communication During Election Times

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Democracy in the Digital Age

Abstract

Social media are often perceived as platforms enabling more direct connection between politicians and citizens. While there is certainly potential for this, it is also important to investigate how these social media platforms are impacting the role and working of the mainstream media. While media logic is a well-studied phenomenon, less is known about social media logic. This contribution questions to what extent social media alter politicians’ dependency on mainstream media and/or generate new dependencies. Social media, in this context, are considered as non-neutral platforms, which are distinct from, yet interact with, mainstream media. The research presented draws on a qualitative approach focusing on the analysis of politicians’ use of Facebook and Twitter, including in-depth interviews with them about their social media behavior. We are particularly interested in how social media function and are perceived in relation to the politicians’ campaigning objectives. In this context, specific attention is given to the use of social media and (1) mainstream media coverage; (2) virality on social media; (3) the power of “likes”; (4) content as a process; and (5) the selectivity of audiences. Despite the “small data” approach and the exploratory character of the research presented within this chapter, our analysis does enable us to reflect upon the interdependencies that the hybrid media ecology produces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Page Post Metrics, https://www.facebook.com/help/336143376466063/ (accessed 3 June 2015).

  2. 2.

    Boosting your posts https://www.facebook.com/business/help/547448218658012/ (accessed 3 June 2015).

References

  • Altheide D, Snow R (1979) Media logic. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ausserhofer J, Maireder A (2013) National politics on Twitter: structures and topics of a networked public sphere. Inf Commun Soc 16(3):291–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumler JG (2014) Mediatization and democracy. In: Esser F, Strömbäck J (eds) Mediatization of politics. Understanding the transformation of Western democracies. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumler JG, Gurevitch M (1995) The crisis of public communication. Routledge, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blumler JG, Gurevitch M (2000) Rethinking the study of political communication. In: Curran J, Gurevitch M (eds) Mass media and society. Adward Arnold, London, pp 155–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Brants K, Voltmer K (2011) Introduction: Mediatization and de-centralization of political communication. In: Brants K, Voltmer K (eds) Political communication in postmodern democracy: challenging the primacy of politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 1–16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Broersma M, Graham T (2012) Social media as beat: tweets as a news source during the 2010 British and Dutch elections. Journal Pract 6(3):403–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns A (2012) How long is a tweet? Mapping dynamic conversation networks on Twitter using Gawk and Gephi. Inf Commun Soc 15(9):1323–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruns A, Moe H (2014) Structural layers of communication on Twitter. In: Weller K, Bruns A, Burgess J, Mahrt M, Puschmann C (eds) Twitter and society. Peter Lang, New York, pp 15–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick A (2013) The hybrid media system: politics and power. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman S (2011) Representation and mediated politics: representing representation in an age of irony. In: Brants K, Voltmer K (eds) Political communication in postmodern democracy: challenging the primacy of politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 39–56

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry N (2008) Mediatization or mediation? Alternative understandings of the emergent space of digital storytelling. New Media Soc 10(3):373–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’heer & Verdegem (2014) Conversations about the elections on Twitter: towards a structural understanding of Twitter’s relation with the political and the media field. Eur J Commun 29(6):720–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren P (2005) The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: dispersion and deliberation. Polit Commun 22(2):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean J (2003) Why the net is not a public sphere. Constellations 10(1):95–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diakopoulos N (2015) Algorithmic accountability. Digit Journal 3(3):398–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessens O, Raeymaeckers K, Verstraeten H, Vandenbussche S (2010) Personalization according to politicians: a practice theoretical analysis of mediatization. Commun Eur J Commun Res 35(3):309–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Enli GS, Skogerbø E (2013) Personalized campaigns in party-centred politics. Inf Commun Soc 16(5):757–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esser F (2013) Mediatization as a challenge: media logic versus political logic. In: Kriesi H, Lavenex S, Esser F, Matthes J, Bühlmann M, Bochsler D (eds) Democracy in the age of globalization and mediatization. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 155–176

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Esser F, Strömbäck J (2014) Mediatization of politics: towards a theoretical framework. In: Esser F, Strömbäck J (eds) Mediatization of politics. Understanding the transformation of Western democracies. Palgrave Macmillan, London, pp 3–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenton N (2012) The internet and social networking. In: Curran J, Fenton N, Freedman D (eds) Misunderstanding the internet. Routledge, New York, pp 123–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerlitz C, Helmond A (2013) The like economy: social buttons and the data-intensive web. New Media Soc 15(8):1348–1365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham T, Broersma M, Hazelhoff K (2013) Closing the gap? Twitter as an instrument for connected representation. In: Scullion R, Gerodimos R, Jackson D, Lilleker D (eds) The media, political participation and empowerment. Routledge, London, pp 71–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosser B (2014) What do metrics want? How quantification prescribes social interaction on Facebook Comput Cult 4. http://computationalculture.net/article/what-do-metrics-want. Accessed 16 Dec 2014

  • Harcup T, O’Neill D (2001) What is news? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journal Stud 2(2):261–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermida A (2010) Twittering the News: the emergence of ambient journalism. Journal Pract 4(3):297–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Bacha C (2004) Germany: How the private life of politicians got into the media. Parliam Aff 57(1):41–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard PN (2006) New media campaigns and the managed citizen. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • iMinds-iLab.o (2014) Digimeter. Adoption and usage of media & ICT in Flanders. Wave 7. iMinds-iLab.o, Ghent

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungherr A (2014) The logic of political coverage on Twitter: temporal dynamics and content. J Commun 64(2):239–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger U (2014) Mastering the art of social media. Swiss parties, the 2011 elections and digital challenges. Inf Commun Soc 16(5):717–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinger U, Svensson J (2014) The emergence of network media logic in political communication: a theoretical approach. New Media Soc 17(8):1241–1257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larsson AO (2015) Pandering, protesting, engaging. Norwegian party leaders on Facebook during the 2013 “Short campaign”. Inf Commun Soc 18(4):459–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecheler S, Kruikemeier S (2015) Re-evaluating journalistic routines in a digital age: a review of research on the use of online sources. New Media Soc 18(1):156–171. doi:10.1177/1461444815600412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilleker DG, Tenscher J, Štětka V (2014) Towards hypermedia campaigning? Perceptions of new media’s importance for campaigning by party strategists in comparative perspective. Inf Commun Soc 18(7):747–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marwick A, boyd d (2011) I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media Soc 13(1):114–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni G, Schulz W (1999) “Mediatization” of politics: a challenge for democracy? Polit Commun 16(3):247–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meraz S, Papacharissi Z (2013) Networked gatekeeping and networked framing on #Egypt. Int J Press/Polit 18(2):138–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer T (2002) Media democracy: how the media colonize politics. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirer ML, Bode L (2013) Tweeting in defeat: how candidates concede and claim victory in 140 characters. New Media Soc 17(3):453–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nahon K, Hemsley J (2013) Going Viral. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris P (2000) A virtuous circle: political communications in post-industrial societies. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parmelee JH (2013a) Political journalists and Twitter: influences on norms and practices. J Media Pract 14(4):291–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmelee JH (2013b) The agenda-building function of political tweets. New Media Soc 16(3):434–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmelee JH, Bichard SL (2012) Politics and the Twitter revolution: how tweets influence the relationship between political leaders and the public. Lexington Books, Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkowiak T, Stanoevska-Slabeva K (2013) German politicians and their Twitter networks in the Bundestag Election 2009. First Monday 18(5). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3816. Accessed 8 May 2015

  • Rieder B (2013) Studying Facebook via data extraction: the Netvizz application. Presented at the 5th annual ACM web science conference, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogstad ID (2013) Political news journalists in social media. Transforming political reporters into political pundits. Journal Pract 8(6):688–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross K, Burger T (2014) Face to face(book): social media, political campaigning and the unbearable lightness of being there. Polit Sci 66(1):46–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer JB (2005) The Political J-Blogger: “Normalizing” a new media form to fit old norms and practices. Journal Theory Pract Crit 6(2):173–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöblom G (1968) Party strategies in a multiparty system. Studentlitteratur, Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephansen HC, Couldry N (2014) Understanding micro-processes of community building and mutual learning on Twitter: a “small data” approach. Inf Commun Soc 17(10):1212–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stieglitz S, Dang-Xuan L (2012) Social media and political communication: a social media analytics framework. Soc Netw Anal Min 3(4):1277–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss AL, Corbin JM (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck J (2008) Four phases of mediatization: an analysis of the mediatization of politics. Int J Press/Polit 13(3):228–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck J, Esser F (2009) Shaping politics: mediatization and media interventionism. In: Lundby K (ed) Mediatization. Concepts, changes, consequences. Peter Lang, New York, pp 205–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck J, Van Aelst P (2013) Why political parties adapt to the media: exploring the fourth dimension of mediatization. Int Commun Gazette 75(4):341–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thimm C, Dang-Anh M, Einspänner J (2014) Mediatized politics – structures and strategies of discursive participation and online deliberation on Twitter. In: Hepp A, Krotz F (eds) Mediatized worlds. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 253–270

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JB (2000) Political scandal: power and visibility in the media age. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tresch A (2009) Politicians in the media: determinants of legislators’ presence and prominence in Swiss newspapers. Int J Press/Polit 14(1):67–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci Z (2014) Engineering the public: big data, surveillance and computational politics. First Monday 19(7). http://technosociology.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Zeynep-Computational-Politics-and-Engineering-the-Public.pdf. Accessed 8 Aug 2014

  • Van Aelst P, van Erkel P, D’heer E, Harder R (2015) Who is leading the campaign charts? Comparing individual popularity on old and new media. Presented at the International Communication Association conference, San Juan, Puerto Rico

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijck J (2014) Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveill Soc 12(2):197–208

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijck J, Poell T (2013) Understanding social media logic. Media Commun 1(1):2–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahl-Jorgensen K (2014) The production of political journalism: the push and pull of power, routines and constraints. In: Reinemann C (ed) The handbook of communication sciences. De Gruyter Mouton, New York, pp 305–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman B, Quan-Haase A, Boase J, Chen W, Hampton K, Díaz I, Miyata K (2003) The social affordances of the internet for networked individualism. J Comput Mediat Commun 8(3)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CAMRI – University of Westminster, London, UK

    Pieter Verdegem

  2. Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    Evelien D’heer

Authors
  1. Pieter Verdegem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Evelien D’heer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pieter Verdegem .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. for Political Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

    Julia Schwanholz

  2. School of Media and Communication, University of Leeds, Leeds, Yorkshire, United Kingdom

    Todd Graham

  3. International and European Law, University of Göttingen, Groningen, Germany

    Peter-Tobias Stoll

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Verdegem, P., D’heer, E. (2018). Social Media Logic and Its Impact on Political Communication During Election Times. In: Schwanholz, J., Graham, T., Stoll, PT. (eds) Managing Democracy in the Digital Age. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61708-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation