Skip to main content

New Rituals for Public Connection: Audiences’ Everyday Experiences of Digital Journalism, Civic Engagement, and Social Life

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Democracy in the Digital Age

Abstract

This contribution explores how digitalization facilitates new patterns of using news to connect to larger social, cultural, civic, and political frameworks. Employing in-depth interviews and Q methodology with Dutch news users of mixed age, gender, and educational level in three regions, it finds that news still provides a major frame of reference to public issues in users’ everyday communications. Rather than a complete “de-ritualization” of news practices, wherein no common trajectories for connecting to public life can be discerned anymore, we argue that digitalization facilitates a “re-ritualization” of public connection in which traditional and new media logics interact. While the news still facilitates community, self-presentation, and security, the forms of public engagement people employ to satisfy these needs are increasingly centered on individuals, inextricably embedded in other activities, and more diverse in terms of content. Finally, we find that while news still remains central to people’s public connection, journalism not necessarily is.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Similarly, news use can be motivated by many incentives, one of them being public connection.

  2. 2.

    Twelve participants were selected within each age group (18–35, 35–60, 61+), 12 participants within each educational subgroup (primary and/or secondary education, vocational education, university education), and 12 participants within each region (Amsterdam, the regional city of Groningen, and rural parts of the Netherlands). Our sample consisted of 18 males and 18 females. Participants in Amsterdam were recruited through the online marketing panel of publishing house De Persgroep. Participants in the Groningen area were sampled through online marketing panel RegioNoord.

  3. 3.

    Participants are mentioned by pseudonyms to protect their privacy.

References

  • Adler R, Goggin J (2005) What do we mean by “civic engagement”? J Transform Educ 3(3):236–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakardjieva M (2003) Virtual togetherness: an everyday-life perspective. Media Cult Soc 25(3):291–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaji S, Buckingham D (2013) The Civic Web. Young people, the internet, civic participation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Banaji S, Cammaerts B (2015) Citizens of Nowhere Land: youth and news consumption in Europe. Journal Stud 16(1):115–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnhurst K (2003) Subjective states. Narratives of citizenship among young Europeans. Multilingua 22(1):133–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baym N (2010) Personal connections in the digital age. Polity Press, Malden, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett W, Wells C, Freelon D (2011) Communicating civic engagement: contrasting models of citizenship in the youth web sphere. J Commun 61(5):835–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley C (2001) No newspaper is no fun – even five decades later. Newsp Res J 22(4):2–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berelson B (1949) What “missing the newspaper” means. In: Lazarsfeld P, Stanton F (eds) Communications research, 1948–1949. Harper, New York, pp 111–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Boczkowski P, Mitchelstein E (2013) The news gap: when the information preferences of the media and the public diverge. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bolter J, Grusin R (2000) Remediation: understanding new media. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulianne S (2009) Does Internet use affect engagement? A meta-analysis of research. Polit Commun 26(2):193–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broersma M, Peters C (2013) Introduction. Rethinking journalism: the structural transformation of a public good. In: Broersma M, Peters C (eds) Rethinking journalism: Trust and participation in a transformed news landscape. Routledge, London, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey J (1989) Communication as culture. Routledge, New York, pp 11–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick A (2013) The hybrid media system: politics and power. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz K (2006) Gathering rich data. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman S, Ross K (2010) The media the public: “them” and “us” in media discourse. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Costera Meijer I, Groot Kormelink T (2014) Checking, sharing, clicking and linking: changing patterns of news use between 2004 and 2014. Digit Journal 3(5):664–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry N (2003) Media rituals: a critical approach. Psychology Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Couldry N, Markham T (2008) Troubled closeness or satisfied distance? Researching media consumption and public orientation. Media Cult Soc 30(1):5–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Couldry N, Livingstone S, Markham T (2007) Media consumption and public engagement: beyond the presumption of attention. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren P (2000) The Internet and the democratization of civic culture. Polit Commun 17(4):335–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren P (2009) Media and political engagement. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayan D, Katz E (1994) Media events. The live broadcasting of history. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Deuze M (2012) Media life. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman J, Amnå E (2012) Political participation and civic engagement: towards a new typology. Hum Aff 22(3):283–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekström M, Olsson T, Shehata A (2014) Spaces for public orientation? Longitudinal effects of Internet use in adolescence. Inf Commun Soc 17(2):168–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliasoph N (1998) Avoiding politics. How Americans produce apathy in everyday life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 230–263

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gauntlett D (2011) Making is connecting: the social meaning of creativity, from DIY and knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcup T, O’Neill D (2001) What is News? Galtung and Ruge revisited. Journal Stud 2(2):261–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasebrink U, Domeyer H (2012) Media repertoires as patterns of behavior and as meaningful practices: a multimethod approach to media use in converging media environments. Participations 9(2):757–779

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilä H, Ahva L (2015) The relevance of journalism: studying news audiences in a digital era. Journal Pract 9(1):50–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Heikkilä H, Kunelius R, Ahva L (2010) From credibility to relevance. Towards a sociology of journalism’s “added value”. Journal Pract 4(3):274–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermida A (2014) Tell everyone: why we share and why it matters. Doubleday Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoelig S (2016) Social participation in online news usage in Europe and its underlying causes: individual versus structural factors. Eur J Commun:393–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaun A (2012) Civic experiences and public connection: media and young people in Estonia. Doctoral dissertation, Örebro University, 37–40, 53–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen B (2000) Radio as ritual. An approach to everyday use of radio. Nordicom Rev 2:259–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Markham T (2015) Public connection. In: The international encyclopedia of political communication, 1st edn. Wiley, pp 1293–1297

    Google Scholar 

  • McCollough K, Crowell J, Napoli P (2016) Portrait of the online local news audience. Digit Journal:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelle C, Davis C, Vladica F (2012) Understanding variation in audience engagement and response: an application of the composite model to receptions of Avatar (2009). Commun Rev 15(2):106–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller T (2007) Cultural citizenship: Cosmopolitanism, consumerism, and television in a neoliberal age. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong J, Cabañes J (2011) Engaged, but not immersed: tracking the mediated public connection of Filipino elite migrants in London. South East Asia Res 19(2):197–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters C (2015) Introduction: the places and spaces of news audiences. Journal Stud 16(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Schrøder K (2015) News Media Old and New: fluctuating audiences, news repertoires and locations of consumption. Journal Stud 16(1):1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson M (1998) The good citizen. A history of American public life. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah N, Kwak L, Holbert D (2001) “Connecting” and “disconnecting” with civic life: patterns of Internet use and the production of social capital. Polit Commun 18(2):141–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheller M (2015) News now: interface, ambience, flow, and the disruptive spatio-temporalities of mobile news media. Journal Stud 16(1):12–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverstone R (1994) Television and everyday life. Routledge, London, pp 166–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck J (2005) In search of a Standard: four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journal Stud 6(3):331–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart J, Peters C, Broersma M (2016a) Navigating cross-media news use. Journal Stud:1–20. doi:10.1080/1461670X.2015.1129285

  • Swart J, Peters C, Broersma M (2016b) Repositioning news and public connection in everyday life. A user-oriented perspective on inclusiveness, engagement, relevance, and constructiveness. Media Culture Soc 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidali D (2010) Millennial encounters with mainstream television news: excess, void, and points of engagement. J Linguist Anthropol 20(2):372–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts S, Stenner P (2012) Doing Q methodological research: theory, method & interpretation. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto M (2011) Community newspaper use promotes social cohesion. Newsp Res J 32(1):19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joëlle Swart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Swart, J., Peters, C., Broersma, M. (2018). New Rituals for Public Connection: Audiences’ Everyday Experiences of Digital Journalism, Civic Engagement, and Social Life. In: Schwanholz, J., Graham, T., Stoll, PT. (eds) Managing Democracy in the Digital Age. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61708-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics