Skip to main content

Environmental Impact Assessment: Between Facilitating Public Contribution and Arbitrary Involvement of NGOs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Governance in Russian Regions

Abstract

This chapter studies Environmental Impact Assessments (EIA) in Russia. An EIA is a legal assessment process, where companies planning a project must evaluate its potential negative impact on the environment. Russian law stipulates mandatory negotiations between business, civil society and state actors during an EIA. The chapter examines how formally-prescribed collaborations during an EIA take place in practice. Thereby, particular attention is paid to the use of meta-governance tools by the state and the specific governance mix. The analysis is based on a qualitative design with six case studies of EIAs in the Krasnodar and Irkutsk regions. It reveals that the Russian authorities use a mix of hard and soft governance-tools in order to govern EIA. The legal framework in Russia involves relatively soft meta-governance tools. The empirical findings, however, demonstrate that EIAs are conducted very differently. One can identify three major patterns which vary significantly in the way the state applies meta-governance tools: softly dominated networks, strongly dominated networks, and mimicked networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agakhanjanz, P. 2006. Prinjatie ėkologicheski znachimych reshenij i rossijskaja obshchestvennost’: Pozicii uchastnikov processa (po materialam intervju). Ėkologicheskoe planirovanie i upravlenie 1: 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begak, Michail, Valerij Kulibaba, Juhan Ruut, and Yana Molchanova. 2009. Preventivnye mechanism ochrany okruzhajushchey sredy v Rossiii Evropeiskom Sojuse. Perspektivy Garmonizacii. Moscow: IurInfor-Press Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekkers, Viktor, Geske Dijkstra, Arthur Edwards, and Menno Fenger. 2007. Governance and the Democratic Deficit. Hampshire: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chebankova, Elena. 2012. State-sponsored Civic Associations in Russia: Systemic Integration or the ‘War of Position’? East European Politics 28 (4): 390–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crotty, Jo, Sarah Marie Hall, and Sergej Ljubonwnikow. 2014. Post-Soviet Civil Society Development in the Russian Federation: The Impact of the NGO Law. Europe-Asia Studies 66 (8): 1253–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Jonathan S. 2012. Network Governance Theory: A Gramscian Critique. Environment and Planning 44 (11): 2687–2704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Alfred. 2012. Protests and Civil Society in Russia: The Struggle for the Khimki Forest. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 45: 233–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fröhlich, Christian. 2012. Civil Society and the State Intertwined: The case of Disability NGOs in Russia. East European Politics 28 (4): 371–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenpeace. 2015. Chinovniki snova pokushajutsja na ekologicheskuju ekspertizu. http://www.greenpeace.org/russia/ru/news/2015/27-07-ecologicheskaya-ekspertiza-pokushenie-2/. Accessed 29 Jan 2017.

  • Henry, Laura A. 2010. Between Transnationalism and State Power: The Development of Russia’s Post-Soviet Environmental Movement. Environmental Politics 19: 756–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heritiér, Adrienne, and Dirk Lehmkuhl. 2008. The Shadow of Hierarchy and New Modes of Governance. Journal of Public Policy 28: 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. 1983. The Tools of Government. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., and H.Z. Margetts. 2007. The tools of government in the digital age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppe, Werner, and Martin Beckmann (eds). 2012. UVPG-Gesetz über die Umweltverträglichkeitsprüfung. Kommentar, 4th ed. Köln: Carl Heymanns.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovalev, Nicole, Johann Köppel, and Eckhard Dittrich. 2007. Demokratie und Umwelt in Russland. Berlin: Lit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljubownikow, Sergej, Jo Crotty, and Peter W. Rodgers. 2013. The State and Civil Society in Post-Soviet Russia: The Development of a Russian-style Civil Society. Progress in Development Studies 13 (2): 153–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mamonova, Natalia, and Oane Visser. 2014. State Marionettes, Phantom Organisations or Genuine Movements? The Paradoxical Emergence of Rural Social Movements in Post-socialist Russia. The Journal of Peasant Studies 41: 491–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikirova, Karina, Kathrin Mueller, and Johannes Schuhmann. 2013. The Influence of Civil Society Activism on Regional Governance Structures in the Russian Federation: Cross-Regional and Policy Comparison. In Civil Society Activism under Authoritarian Rule: A comparative Perspective, ed. Fracesco Cavartorta, 111–134. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milward, H. Brinton. 2001. Do Networks Really Work? A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks. Public Administration Review 61: 414–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nußberger, Angelika, and Carmen Schmidt. 2007. Vereinsleben auf Russisch oder Don Quichote und die russische Bürokratie. Russlandanalysen 138: 2–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2006. Environmental Policy and Regulation in Russia: The Implementation Challenge. http://inece.org/oecdtmp/cd/en/docs/regional/environmental_policy_challenge_russia_en.pdf.

  • Schuhmann, Johannes. 2012. Governance-Strukturen in der regionalen Umweltpolitik Russlands: Verhandlungen zwischen Staat, Wirtschaft und Zivilgesellschaft. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vabo, Signy Irene, and Asbjørn Røiseland. 2012. Conceptualizing the Tools of Government in Urban Network Governance. International Journal of Public Administration 35 (14): 934–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vedung, Evert Oskar. 1998. Policy Instruments: Typologies and theories. In Carrots, sticks & sermons. Policy instruments & their evaluation, eds M.-L. Bemelmans-Videc, R.C. Rist and E. Vedung, 21–58. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Schuhmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schuhmann, J., Kropp, S. (2018). Environmental Impact Assessment: Between Facilitating Public Contribution and Arbitrary Involvement of NGOs. In: Kropp, S., Aasland, A., Berg-Nordlie, M., Holm-Hansen, J., Schuhmann, J. (eds) Governance in Russian Regions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61702-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics