Skip to main content

Automatic Breast Ultrasound Scanning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Lobar Approach to Breast Ultrasound

Abstract

From the experience acquired on the six automatic breast ultrasound machines presented by the manufacturers, we show the advantages and limitations of this technique in this brief chapter.

In the future of automatic breast scanners expected to be growing, we present some aspects of the ideal equipment which some technicians are already beginning to develop.

This equipment must involve the notion of an ultrasound lobar approach of the breast which is the only one to allow a standardization of the method, to lay out strict examination protocols and define diagnostic criteria already analysed in previous chapters of this book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wojcinski S, Farrokh A, Hille U, Wiskirchen J, Gyapong S, Soliman AA, Degenhardt F, Hillemanns P. The automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) initial experiences in lesion detection compared with conventional handheld B-mode ultrasound: a pilot study of 50 cases. Int J Womens Health. 2011;3:337–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Giger ML, Inciardi MF, Edwards A, Papaioannou J, Drukker K, Jiang Y, Brem R, Brown JB. Automated breast ultrasound in breast cancer screening of women with dense breasts: reader study of mammography-negative and mammography-positive cancers. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016;206:1341–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Berg WA, Bandos AI, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Jong RA, Pisano ED. Ultrasound as the primary screening test for breast cancer: analysis from ACRIN 6666. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2016;108:djv367. PMID: 26712110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brem R, Tabar L, Duffy S, Inciardi M, Guingrich J, Hashimoto B, Lander M, Lapidus R, Petreson M, Rapelyea J, Roux S, Schilling K, Shah B, Torrente J, Wynn R, Miller D. Assessing improvement in detection of breast cancer with three-dimensional automated breast US in women with dense breast tissue : the Somolnsight study. Radiology. 2015;274(3):663–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilczek B, Wilczek Henryk E, Leifland K, Rasouliyan L. Adding 3D automated breast ultrasound to mammography screening in women with heterogeneously and extremely dense breasts. Eur J Radiol. 2016;85:1554–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Duric N, Boyd N, Littrup P, Sak M, Myc L, Li C, West E, Minkin S, Martin L, Yaffe M, Schmidt S, Faiz M, Shen J, Melnichouk O, Li Q, Albrecht T. Breast density measurements with ultrasound tomography: a comparison with film and digital mammography. Med Phys. 2013;40:013501. PMID: 23298122

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen JH, Lee YW, Chan SW, et al. Breast density analysis with automated whole breast ultrasound: comparison with 3D magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016;42:1211.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen JH, Chan S, Lu NH, et al. Opportunistic breast density assessment in women receiving low dose chest computed tomography screening. Acad Radiol. 2016;23:1154.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Scheel JR, Lee JM, Sprague BL, Lee CI, Lehman CD. Screening ultrasound ’ as an adjunct to mammography in women with mammographically dense breasts. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212:9–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moon WK, Shen Y-W, Huang CS, Chiang LR, Chang RF. Computer-aided diagnosis for the classification of breast masses in automated whole breast ultrasound images. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:539–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shin HJ, Kim HH, Cha JH, Park JH, Lee KE, Kim JH. Automated ultrasound of the breast for diagnosis : interobserver agreement on lesion detection and characterization. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:474–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shin H, Kim HH, Cha JH. Current status of automated breast ultrasonography. Ultrasonography. 2015;34:165–72. PMID: 25971900

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Golatta M, Baggs C, Schweitzer-Martin M, Domschke C, Schott S, Harcos A, Scharf A, Junkermann H, Ranch G, Rom J, Sohn C, Heil J. Evaluation of an automated breast 3D-ultrasound system by comparing it with hand-held ultrasound (HHUS) and mammography. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015;291:889–95. PMID: 25311201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van Zelst JC, Platel B, Karssemeijer N, Mann RM. Multiplanar reconstructions of 3d automated breast ultrasound improve lesion differentiation by radiologists. Acad Radiol. 2015;22:1489–96. PMID: 26345538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Van Zelst JC, Platel B, Karssemeijer N, Mann RM. Multiplanar reconstructions of 3d automated breast ultrasound improve lesion differentiation by radiologists. Acad Radiol. 2015;22:1489–96. (PMID: 26345538)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dominique Amy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Amy, D. (2018). Automatic Breast Ultrasound Scanning. In: Amy, D. (eds) Lobar Approach to Breast Ultrasound. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61681-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61681-0_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61680-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61681-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics