Advertisement

Site Investigation Using Engineering Geology Mapping and Geological Hazard Evaluation: Case Study of the New Hail Economic City, Hail Region, KSA

  • Turki E. Al-Sehly
  • Ahmed M. Youssef
  • Abdulla A. Al-Otaibi
  • Hassan M. Al-Harbi
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)

Abstract

The New Hail Economic City in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is one of the pioneer projects and represents a corner stone for the new development activities for Hail region. It is located to the north of the Hail city, covering an area of ~156 km2. Fundamental facilities of this project will include infrastructure, residential, commercial, industrial, and a new international airport. The present study aims to establish a new approach of site investigation using engineering geologic mapping and geological hazard evaluation. To achieve this approach, physical and engineering characteristics of surface and subsurface soil and/or rocks of the study area were evaluated. Several data sources were used including: geologic and topographic maps, satellite images, previous data and reports, and detailed field and laboratory investigations of soil and rocks. Our finding indicated that the study area is characterized by soil layer which varies in thickness from 0 to 12 m and rock outcrops. An engineering geology mapping of the new economic city was prepared using GIS environment. It classifies the area into six zones (4 for soils and 2 for rock outcrops) according to their physical and geotechnical properties. Three cross sections were prepared according to subsurface data showing the layers variations within the study area. Finally, the geological hazards causing negative impact on the area were identified. Various recommendations were proposed to help project decision makers to deal with the geological and geotechnical problems.

Keywords

Site investigation Engineering geology mapping Geological hazards GIS KSA 

References

  1. Aly, M.H.: Integration of remote sensing and GIS for geo-environmental assessment and monitoring of the New Minia City, Egypt. M.Sc. thesis, Geology Department, Faculty of Science, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt (1997)Google Scholar
  2. Aly, M.H., et al.: Suitability assessment for New Minia City, Egypt: a GIS approach to engineering geology. Environ. Eng. Geosci. XI(3), 259–269 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Harbi, H.M., et al.: Engineering geological map of Ad Dammam, Dhahran and Al-Khobar cities, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Geological Survey technical report SGS-TR-2008-4, 39 p. (2009)Google Scholar
  4. Al-Rasheed, M.: Politics in an Arabian Oasis: the Ibn Rashid tribal dynasty. I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd., London, New York (1991). ISBN 1-85043-320-8. Based on a Ph.D. thesis presented to Cambridge University, 1988Google Scholar
  5. Anonymous: The preparation of maps and plans in terms of engineering geology. Report of a working party of the engineering group of the geological society. Q. J. Eng. Geol. 5, 293–381 (1972)Google Scholar
  6. Anonymous: BS EN ISO 14688-1-Geotechnical investigation and testing. Identification and classification of soil—part 1: identification and description. British Standards Institution, London (2002)Google Scholar
  7. ASTM: Soil and rock building stone, peats, annual book of ASTM standards, part 19. American Society of Testing and Material (1989)Google Scholar
  8. Barton, N.R. et al.: Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support. Rock Mech. 6, 189–236. Springer, Heidelberg (1974)Google Scholar
  9. Bieniawski, Z.T.: Engineering classification of jointed rock masses. Trans. S. Afr. Inst. Civ. Eng. 15, 335–344 (1973)Google Scholar
  10. Bieniawski, Z.T.: Engineering Rock Mass Classifications, p. 251. Wiley, New York (1989)Google Scholar
  11. Brown, G.F. et al.: Geologic map of the wadi ar-Rimah quadrangle, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. U.S. Geological Survey Miscellaneous Geologic Investigation Map 1–205A, scale 1: 50,000 (1963)Google Scholar
  12. Brown, G.F., Jackson, R.O.: The Arabian shield. In: 21st Proceeding International Geology Congress, Copenhagen, Sec. 9, pp. 69–77 (1960)Google Scholar
  13. Chacon, J., et al.: Engineering geology maps: landslides and geographical information systems. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 65, 341–411 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chávez, J.A., et al.: Engineering geology mapping in the southern part of the Metropolitan area of San Salvador. Revista Geológica de América Central 46, 161–178 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. Commission Staff Working Document: Implementation plan of the EU strategy for supporting disaster risk reduction in developing countries 2011–2014, SEC (2011), vol. 215. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium (2011)Google Scholar
  16. Craa’chlev, C.R., Denness, B.: Engineering geology in urban planning with an example from the new city of Milton Keynes. In: International Geological Congress, 24th Session, Montreal, Section 13 Proceedings, pp. 13–22 (1972)Google Scholar
  17. Dearman, W.R., Fookes, P.G.: Engineering geological mapping for civil engineering practice in the United Kingdom. Q. J. Eng. Geol. 7, 223–256 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deere, D.U.: Technical description of rock cores for engineering purposes. Rock Mech. Eng. Geol. 1(1), 17–22 (1964)Google Scholar
  19. Deere, D.V., Miller, R.D.: Engineering classification and index properties of intact rock. Technical reference AFNL-TR-65-116. University of Illinois (1966)Google Scholar
  20. Delfour, J.: Geologic, tectonic and metallogenic evolution of the Northern part of the Precambrian Arabian Shield (Kingdom of Saudi Arabia). Bulletin BRGM, II(1–2), 1–19 (1980a)Google Scholar
  21. El-Haddad, A.A., Youssef, A.M.: Overview of the potential geo-environmental hazards in the low desert zone, Egypt. Case study: new projects West of El-Kawamel village, Sohag, Egypt. Assiut Univ. J. Geol. 37(2) (2008)Google Scholar
  22. Geological Society of London: The description of rock mass for engineering purposes. Q. J. Eng. Geol. 10, 355–388 (1977)Google Scholar
  23. Graña, A.M. et al.: Engineering geology maps for planning and management of natural parks. Las Batuecas-Sierra de Francia and Quilamas (Central Spanish System, Salamanca, Spain). Geosciences 3, 46–62 (2013). doi: 10.3390/geosciences3010046
  24. International Association Enginering Geology and Environment (IAEG): Engineering Geological Maps: A Guide to Their Preparation, p. 79. UNESCO Press, Paris (1976)Google Scholar
  25. International Association Enginering Geology and Environment (IAEG): Recommended symbols for engineering geological mapping. Bull. Intern. Assoc. Eng. Geol. 24, 227–234 (1981a)Google Scholar
  26. International Association Enginering Geology and Environment (IAEG): Rock and soil description for engineering geological mapping. Bull. Intern. Assoc. Engn. Geol. 24, 235–274 (1981b)Google Scholar
  27. ISRM: Quantitative description of discontinuity in rock masses. Int J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. Geomech. Abstr. 15, 319–368 (1977)Google Scholar
  28. Jato, J.N. et al.: Engineering geological mapping for the urban area of Salamanca (Spain). IAEG2006 Paper number 315 (2006)Google Scholar
  29. Kellogg, K.S., Stoeser, D.B.: Reconnaissance geology of the Ha’il Quadrangle, sheet 27/41 B, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. U.S. geological survey, Open-file report 85–618, vol. ii, 35 p. (1985)Google Scholar
  30. Mohammed, A.M.S., et al.: Geotechnical risks map of Saïda City. Algeria. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 15, 403–413 (2010)Google Scholar
  31. Okogbue, C.O., Aghamelu, O.P.: Comparison of the geotechnical properties of crushed shales from Southeastern Nigeria. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 69, 587–597 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Palmstrom, A.: The volumetric joint count - a useful and simple measure of the degree of rock mass jointing. In: IAEG Congress, New Delhi, pp. V.221–V.228 (1982)Google Scholar
  33. Parry, S., Hart, J.R.: Engineering geology and the reduction of geotechnical risk: challenges facing the profession in Hong Kong. Q. J. Eng. Geol. Hydrogeol. 42, 499–510 (2009)Google Scholar
  34. Planet, L.: The Middle East, 3rd edn. (2000). ISBN 0-86442-701-8Google Scholar
  35. Que, J.S., et al.: Geotechnical properties of the soft soil in Guangzhou College City. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 67, 479–483 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rozos, D., et al.: Engineering-geological map of the wider Thessaloniki area. Greece. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 63, 103–108 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Solberg, I.L., et al.: Combined geophysical and geotechnical approach to ground investigations and hazard zonation of a quick clay area, mid Norway. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 71, 119–133 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. UNESCO: Engineering Geological Maps: A Guide to Their Preparation. UNESCO press, Paris, 79 p. (1976)Google Scholar
  39. Waltham, A.C.: Foundations of Engineering Geology; Blackie Academic and Professional. Chapman and Hall, London (1994)Google Scholar
  40. Wickham, G.E. et al.: Support determination based on geologic predictions. In: Lane, K.S., Garfield, L.A. (eds.) Proceedings of North American Rapid Excavation Tunneling Conference, Chicago, New York, pp. 43–64 (1972). Soc. Min. Engrs, Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Petrolm. EngrsGoogle Scholar
  41. Xu, B., Li, Y.: Engineering geological mapping for an open pit. J. Bull. Eng. Geol. Environ. 21(1), 131–138 (1980). doi: 10.1007/BF02591553 Google Scholar
  42. Youssef, A.M.: Mapping the Pliocene clay deposits using remote sensing and its impact on the urbanization developments in Egypt: case study, East Sohag area. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 26, 579–591 (2008). doi: 10.1007/s10706-008-9191-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Youssef, A.M., Moneim, A.A.A.: Evaluation of the geo-environmental hazard in relation to the future development using geographic information systems, East Sohag area, Egypt. In: The Third International Conference of Environment and Development in the Arab World, Assiut, Egypt, vol. 1, pp. 673–692, March 2006Google Scholar
  44. Youssef, A.M., et al.: Coupling of remote sensing data aided with field investigations for geological hazards assessment in Jazan area, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Environ. Earth Sci. 65(1), 119–130 (2011). doi: 10.1007/s12665-011-1071-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Youssef, A.M., et al.: Natural and human-induced sinkhole hazards in Saudi Arabia: distribution, investigation, causes and impacts. Hydrogeol. J. 24(3), 625–644 (2016). doi: 10.1007/s10040-015-1336-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Turki E. Al-Sehly
    • 1
  • Ahmed M. Youssef
    • 1
    • 2
  • Abdulla A. Al-Otaibi
    • 1
  • Hassan M. Al-Harbi
    • 1
  1. 1.Geological Hazards DepartmentApplied Geology Sector, Saudi Geological SurveyJeddahKingdom of Saudi Arabia
  2. 2.Faculty of Science, Geology DepartmentSohag UniversitySohagEgypt

Personalised recommendations