Skip to main content

Behavior of Bored Piles in Two Soil Layers, Sand Overlaying Compressible Clay (Case Study)

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1399 Accesses

Part of the book series: Sustainable Civil Infrastructures ((SUCI))

Abstract

Piles foundations have the function of transferring loads from the superstructure through weak compressible strata onto stiffer or more compact soils or onto rock. This is soil profile is considered the ideal profile for pile foundations. While for soil profile including strong soil strata overlaying compressible soils, the estimation of piles behavior will be more difficult. Forty six residential buildings consisted of twelve stories were constructed at the north of Nile delta in Egypt. Bored piles with lengths equal to or more than 27.0 m were chosen to support the raft foundations of these buildings. Soil investigations concluded that the soil consists of dense sand overlaying compressible clay that extended down to 40.0 m, while the ground water was found near ground surface. Soil properties were determined through drilling four boreholes at the site with 60.0 m depth and disturbed and undisturbed samples were collected. Six cone penetration tests (CPTU) with 25.0 m depth were achieved to estimate soil properties and also to estimate bearing capacity of the piles. Five preliminary pile load tests were carried out on different types of piles. Four rotary drilling bored piles and one contentious flight auger were tested having lengths ranged between 27.0 m and 37.0 m, while its diameter ranged between 0.60 m and 0.7 m. The static load tests continued to load equal to 200 t which is equal to 250% the allowable pile load. Some tests completed within 48 h and some within 7 days to check the time-load-effect. In the light of these measurements, comparisons have been achieved between the bearing capacities of piles estimated by the results of CPTU and those measured by field tests. Moreover, the ultimate bearing capacities of piles estimated by Egyptian and Canadian Codes have been compared with those measured by field tests. Good agreement was noticed between the bearing capacity of piles estimated by methods depended directly on CPTU. While the indirect methods depended on soil parameters derived from CPTU produced lower values than the measured. It was also noticed that the estimated bearing capacities of piles based on soil properties derived from lab tests did not soundly match with the measured values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aas, G., Lacasse, S., Lunne, T., Hoeg, K.: Use of in situ tests for foundation design on clay. In: Proceedings of In situ 1986, Use of In Situ Tests in Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 1–30 (1986). ASCE GSP 6, Blacksburg, Virginia

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazaraa, A., Sherif, M.M., Mashhour, M.: Some geotechnical properties of port said silty clay. Egypt. Soc. SMFE 1, 27–34 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, J.E.: Foundation Analysis and Design. McGraw-Hill Book Company, Singapore (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D.A.: Practical considerations in the selection and use of contentious flight auger and drilling displacement piles. Geotechnical Special Publication No. 132, ASCE, 2005, pp. 1–11 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D.A., et al.: Design and construction of continuous flight auger (CFA) piles. Geotechnical Engineering Circular No. 8, Report No. FHWA-HIF-07-03 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • de Ruiter, J., Beringen, F.L.: Pile foundations for large North Sea structures. Mar. Geotech. 3(3), 267–314 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eslami, A., Fellenius, B.H.: Pile capacity by direct CPT and CPTU methods applied to 102 case histories. Can. Geotech. J. 34, 886–904 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, W.K.: The understanding of continuous flight auger piling, its monitoring and control. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Geotech. Eng. 113(3), 157–165 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamiolkowski, M., Ladd, C.C., Germaine, J.T., Lancellotta, R.: New developments in field and laboratory testing of soils. In: Theme Lecture, 11th ICSMFE, San Francisco (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferies, M.G., Davies, M.P.: Use of CPTu to estimate equivalent SPT N60. Am. Soc. Test. Mater. ASTM Geotech. Test. J. 16(4), 458–468 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • King, G.J.W., et al.: The influence of rate of loading on the behavior of continuous-flight-auger bored piles in soft clay. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 18, 139–153 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lunne, T., Eidsmoen, D., Howland, J.D.: Laboratory and field evaluation of cone penetrometer. American society of civil engineers. In: Proceedings of In-Situ 1986, 23–25 June, pp. 714–729 (1986). ASCE SPT 6, Blacksburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lunne, T., Kleven, A.: Role of CPT in North Sea foundation engineering. In: Symposium on Cone Penetration Engineering Division, October 1981, pp. 49–75 (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerhof, G.G.: Bearing capacity and settlement of pile foundations. J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE 102(3), 197–228 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, P.K., Campanella, R.G.: Interpretation of cone penetrometer tests, Part I sand. Can. Geotech. J. 20(4), 718–733 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, P.K., Campanella, R.G., Gillespie, D., Greig, J.: Use of piezometer cone data. In: In-Situ 1986 Use of In-situ testing in Geotechnical Engineering, pp. 1263–1280. Specialty Publication (1986). GSP 6, ASCE, Reston, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmertmann, J.H.: Guidelines for cone penetration test. Performance and Design. U.S. Department of Transportation, Report No. FHWA-TS-78-209, Washington, DC, p. 145 (1978). Bustamente (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, T.D., Juhrend, J.E.: Undrained shear strength from cone penetration tests. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 1, pp. 327–330 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumay, M.T., Fakhroo, M.: Friction pile capacity prediction in cohesive soils using electric quasi-static penetration tests. Interim Research Report No. 1, Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Research and Development Section, Baton Rouge, LA, 275 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adel H. Hammam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hammam, A.H., Salam, A.E.A. (2018). Behavior of Bored Piles in Two Soil Layers, Sand Overlaying Compressible Clay (Case Study). In: Abu-Farsakh, M., Alshibli, K., Puppala, A. (eds) Advances in Analysis and Design of Deep Foundations. GeoMEast 2017. Sustainable Civil Infrastructures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61642-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics