Runoff Simulation Using SWAT Model in the Middle Reaches of the Dagu River Basin
This article uses Dagu River basin that is located in Qingdao of Shandong Province as the research object, and sets up the hydrological model using SWAT hydrological model and the software of ARCGIS 9.3 which was combined with the basin DEM figure, soil, land use, the observed meteorological data and runoff data. It then established a simulation for regional hydrology on the basis of the runoff data in 1986–2000 and adjusts sensitive parameters by SWAT CUP-2012. The results showed that the determination coefficient (R2) was higher than 0.8 and Nash efficiency coefficient (NS) was higher than 0.7. Therefore, the simulation results can meet the requirements. In addition, it sets up five different land use scenarios and 25 kinds of assumptions of the weather situations to analyze the surface runoff variation of Dagu River basin with two different scenarios, and then sums up the impact of surface runoff influenced by land use change and climate change in Dagu River. The simulation results have an important reference value and practical significance for the sustainable development of this basin in the future and a reasonable allocation of water resources.
KeywordsRunoff simulation SWAT model Land use change Dagu River basin
This research was financially supported by Key research and development project of Hebei Province (16263604D).
- 2.Hewlett, J., Troendle, C.: Non-point and diffused water sources: a variable source area problem. In: Watershed Management Proceeding Symposium of American Society of Civil Engineers. New York held in Logan, Utah (1975)Google Scholar
- 4.Abbott, M.B., Bathurst, J.C., Cunge, J.A., et al.: An introduction to the European hydrological system-system hydrologique European. “SHE”, l: history and philosophy hydrology of a physically-based distributed modeling system. J. Hydrol. 87(1–2), 45–59 (1986)Google Scholar
- 6.Bathurst, J.C., Wiek, J.M., O’Connell, P.E.: The SHE/SHESED basin scale water flow and sediment transport modeling system. Colorado water flow Water Resources (1995)Google Scholar
- 7.Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., et al.: Soil and water assessment tool’s theoretical documentation, version 2000. TWRI Report TR-191, Texas Water Resources Institute, College Station, Texas (2002)Google Scholar
- 12.Harmel, R.D., Richardson, C.W., King, K.W: Hydrologic response of a small watershed model to generated precipitation. Trans. ASAE 43(6), 1483–1488  (2000)Google Scholar
- 13.Chanasyk, D.S., Map Fumo, E., Wilhns, W.: Quantification and simulation of surface runoff from fescue grassland watersheds. Agric. Water Manag. 59(2), 137–153 (2003)Google Scholar
- 15.Andrea, W., Fohrer, N., Moler, D.: Long-term land use change in a mesoscale watershed due to socio-economic factors-effects on and landscape structures functions. Ecol. Model. 140(1–2), 125–140 (2001)Google Scholar
- 16.Kannan, N., White, S.M., Worrall, F.: Sensitivity analysis and identification of the best evapotranspiration and runoff options for hydrological modeling in SWAT2000. J. Hydrol. (2006)Google Scholar