Advertisement

Road Performance Prediction Model for the Libyan Road Network Depending on Experts’ Knowledge and Current Road Condition Using Bayes Linear Regression

  • Abdussalam HebaEmail author
  • Gabriel J. Assaf
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)

Abstract

The accurate prediction of rates of road deterioration is important in Pavement Management Systems (PMS), to ensure efficient and forward looking management and for setting present and future budget requirements. Libyan roads face increasing damage from the lack of regular maintenance. This reinforces the need to develop a system to predict road deterioration in order to determine optimal pavement intervention strategies (OIS). In a PMS, pavement deterioration can be modeled deterministically or probabilistically. This paper proposes a Bayesian linear regression method to develop a performance model in the absence of historical data; instead, the model uses expert knowledge as a prior distribution. As such, Libyan Road experts who have worked for a long time with the Libyan Road and Transportation Agency have been interviewed to develop input data to feed the Bayesian Model. A posterior distribution was computed using a likelihood function depending on road condition inspections in accordance with a pre-established protocol. The results were the pavement deterioration prediction models based on expert knowledge and a few on-site inspections.

Keywords

Pavement management systems Pavement performance International roughness index (IRI) Bayesian linear regression 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the Libyan Road Agency as well as all the participating experts who have provided insight and expertise, without which this project would not have been possible.

References

  1. Amador-Jimenez, L.E., Mrawira, D.: Bayesian regression in pavement deterioration modeling: revisiting the AASHO road test rut depth model. Infraestruct. Vial 25, 28–35 (2012)Google Scholar
  2. Clark, M.: Bayesian Basics, a conceptual introduction with application in R and Stan. 2nd 13 Jun 2015. https://m-clark.github.io/docs/IntroBayes.html
  3. Davison, A.C.: Statistical Models. Cambridge University Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  4. Gongdon, P.: Applied Bayesian Modelling. Wiley, West Sussex (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Haas, R.: Pavement Management Guide. Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa (1977)Google Scholar
  6. Haas, R.: Modern Pavement Management. Krieger Pub Co., Malabar Florida (1994)Google Scholar
  7. Han, D., et al.: Application of Bayesian estimation method with Markov hazard model to improve deterioration forecasts for infrastructure asset management. KSCE J. Civil Eng. 18(7), 2107–2119 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hong, F., Prozzi, J.A.: Estimation of pavement performance deterioration using Bayesian approach. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 12(2), 77–86 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hong, T., et al.: Infrastructure asset management system for bridge projects in South Korea. KSCE J. Civil Eng. 17(7), 1551–1561 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jongsawat, N., Premchaiswadi, W.: Bayesian network inference with qualitative expert knowledge for decision support systems. pp. 3–8 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. Kobayashi, K., et al.: A statistical deterioration forecasting method using hidden Markov model for infrastructure management. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 46(4), 544–561 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lethanh, N., et al.: Optimal intervention strategies for multiple objects affected by manifest and latent deterioration processes. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 11(3), 389–401 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li, N., et al.: Development of a new asphalt pavement performance prediction model. Can. J. Civil Eng. 24(4), 547–559 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li, Z.: A Probabilistic and Adaptive Approach to Modeling Performance of Pavement Infrastructure. Faculty of the Graduate School, University of Texas at Austin. Ph.d. (2005)Google Scholar
  15. Lunn, D., et al.: WinBUGS - A Bayesian modelling framework: Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat. Comput. 10(4), 325–337 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Madanat, S.M., et al.: Probabilistic infrastructure deterioration models with panel data. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 3(1), 4–9 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mašović, S., Hajdin, R.: Modelling of bridge elements deterioration for Serbian bridge inventory. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. 10(8), 976–987 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. Medical Research Council: WinBugs Installation (2016). Retrieved 30 Sept 2016, http://www.mrc-bsu.cam.ac.uk/software/bugs/
  19. Nagaraja, H.N.: Inference in hidden markov models. Technometrics 48(4), 574–575 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ortiz-Garcia, J.J., et al.: Derivation of transition probability matrices for pavement deterioration modeling. J. Transp. Eng. 132(2), 141–161 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pandis, N.: The sampling distribution. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 147(4), 517–519 (2015a)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pandis, N.: Statistical inference with confidence intervals. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 147(5), 632–634 (2015b)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Premkumar, L., Vavrik, W.R.: Enhancing pavement performance prediction models for the Illinois Tollway System Google Scholar
  24. Prozzi, J., Madanat, S.: Incremental nonlinear model for predicting pavement serviceability. J. Transp. Eng. 129(6), 635–641 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schwartz, J., et al.: Improved maximum-likelihood estimation of the shape parameter in the Nakagami distribution. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 83(3), 434–445 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shahin, M.Y.: Pavement Management for Airports, Roads and Parking Lots. Springer Science, New York (2005)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ecole de Technologie SupérieureMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations