Abstract
Iconic photographs identify important problems and features of audience reception. Hariman and Lucaites analyze how the meaning and effects of iconic photographs are produced through an afterlife of appropriation across a wide array of media. In this chapter they identify three modalities of appropriation: establishing iconic status through design features, repetition, and misrecognition; tracking circulation and patterns of interpretation; and analysis of public culture. They demonstrate basic protocols for analyzing appropriations in a case study of the photograph of the US flag raising on Iwo Jima during World War II: these protocols include aesthetic conventions as they animate civic performance through the interplay of semiotic transcriptions and emotional scenarios that function to mediate constitutive contradictions in the public culture.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bauman, Richard. 1989. Performance. International Encyclopedia of Communications. New York: Oxford University Press.
Becker, Karin. 2017. Where Have All the Icons Gone: Images of Protest in Transnational News. Presented at the Workshop on News Images and Icons in the Digital Age: Photojournalism in Transition. January 10, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.
Bradley, James. 2000. Flags of Our Fathers. New York: Bantam Books.
Buck-Morss, Susan. 2011. Visual Studies in Global Imagination. In The Politics of Imagination, ed. Chiara Bottici and Benoit Challand, 214–233. Oxon, UK: Birkbeck Law Press.
Burke, Kenneth. 1973. Literature as Equipment for Living. In The Philosophy of Literary Form, 293–304. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Campbell, David. 2013. Afterword: Abundant Photography, Discursive Limits, and the Work of Images. In The Versatile Image: Photography, Digital Technologies and the Internet, ed. Alexandra Moschovi, Carol McKay, and Arabella Plouviez, 265–272. Belgium: Louvain University Press.
Casey, Michael. 2009. Che’s Afterlife: The Legacy of an Image. New York: Vintage.
Condit, Celeste Michelle. 2013/1989. The Rhetorical Limits of Polysemy. In The Routledge Reader in Rhetorical Criticism. New York: Routledge.
Edwards, Janice K., and Carol L. Winkler. 1997. Representative Form and the Visual Ideograph: The Iwo Jima Image in Editorial Cartoons. Quarterly Journal of Speech 83: 269–289.
Frosh, Paul. 2015. The Gestural Image: The Selfie, Photography Theory, and Kinesthetic Sociability. International Journal of Communication 9: 1607–1628.
Fussell, Paul. 1979. Images of Anonymity: World War II in Black and White. Harper’s (September): 76–81.
Garnett, Joy, and Susan Meiselas. 2007. On the Rights of Molotov Man. Harper’s (February): 53–58.
Garver, Eugene. 1994. Aristotle’s Rhetoric: An Art of Character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gries, Laurie E. 2015. Still Life with Rhetoric: A New Materialist Approach for Visual Rhetorics. Logan: Utah State University Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Thomas Burger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hariman, Robert. 1995. Political Style: The Artistry of Power. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. 2017. Public Culture. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication, ed. Jon Nussbaum. New York: Oxford University Press. http://communication.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-32.
Hariman, Robert, and John Louis Lucaites. 2007. No Caption Needed: Iconic Photographs, Public Culture, and Liberal Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
———. 2008. Problems and Prospects in the Study of Visual Culture. Review of Communication 8: 16–20.
———. 2012. Seeing the Bomb. Imagining the Future: Allegorical Vision in the Post-Cold War Nuclear Optic. Cahiers ReMix 1. http://oic.uqam.ca/en/remix/seeing-the-bomb-imagining-the-future-allegorical-vision-in-the-post-cold-war-nuclear-optic
———. 2015a. Icons, Iconicity, and Cultural Critique. Sociologica. http://www.sociologica.mulino.it/journal/article/index/Article/Journal:ARTICLE:827/Item/Journal:ARTICLE:827
———. 2015b. Street Execution of a Viet Cong Prisoner, Saigon, 1968. In Getting the Picture: The Visual Culture of the News, ed. Jason E. Hill and Vanessa R. Schwartz, 91–93. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
———. 2016. The Public Image: Photography and Civic Spectatorship. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hasian, Marouf, Jr. 2008. Iconic Materials, Hermeneutics of Faith, and the Postmodern Reproduction of Public Democracies. The Review of Communication 8: 1–15.
Huffington Post. 2012. The Most Iconic White House Photos of Obama’s First Term (So Far). August 24. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/24/white-house-photos-most-iconic_n_1827792.html
Kennedy, Liam. 2015. The Situation Room, Washington, DC, 2011. In Getting the Picture: The Visual Culture of the News, ed. Jason E. Hill and Vanessa R. Schwartz, 100–102. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Marling, Karal Ann, and John Wetenhall. 1991. Iwo Jima: Monuments, Memories, and the American Hero. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mitchell, W.J.T. 2006. Realism and the Digital Image. In Critical Realism in Contemporary Art: Around Allan Sekula’s Photography, ed. Jan Baertens and Hilde Van Gelder, 12–27. Louvain, Belgium: Leuven University Press.
Morris, Errol. 2011. Believing is Seeing (Observations on the Mysteries of Photography). New York: Penguin Books.
Ritchin, Fred. 2009. After Photography. New York: W.W. Norton.
Stromer-Galley, Jennifer, and Edward Schiappa. 1998. The Argumentative Burdens of Audience Conjectures: Audience Research in Popular Culture Criticism. Communication Theory 8: 27–62.
The Simpsons. 1993. Selma’s Choice. Season 11, Episode 9. Originally broadcast January 21, 1993.
USNI News. 2015. Iwo Jima at 70: The Most Reproduced and Parodied Photo in History. February 23. https://news.usni.org/2015/02/23/iwo-jima-at-70-the-most-reproduced-and-parodied-photo-in-history
Warner, Michael. 2002. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hariman, R., Lucaites, J.L. (2018). Icons, Appropriations, and the Co-production of Meaning. In: Kjeldsen, J. (eds) Rhetorical Audience Studies and Reception of Rhetoric. Rhetoric, Politics and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61618-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61618-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61617-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61618-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)