Remediation of Petroleum Hydrocarbons in a Tropical Sand Tank Model
This paper evaluates In-Situ Chemical Oxidation (ISCO) remediation technique for the remediation of hydrocarbon contaminated soil and groundwater in a laboratory three Dimensional (3D) sand tank model. The sand tank model was used to study natural attenuation and chemical oxidation of petroleum hydrocarbon in groundwater within a Tropical aquifer (porous media) material. Detailed geotechnical, hydraulic and geochemical characterization of the chosen laboratory experimental porous media material were performed. 60 ml of unleaded gasoline was introduced as a contaminant of concern into the 3-D sand tank via the injection wells. Thereafter, samples were taken periodically for 24 days for Benzene, Toluene, Ethyl benzene, and Xylene (BTEX) analysis was done for Natural Attenuation case study. Sand replacement was done for case study of Insitu chemical oxidation (ISCO I and ISCO II), the same volume of gasoline was injected as pollutant, Potassium permanganate (KMnO4) was chosen as oxidizing agent with varied percentages (1.5% and 5%). Samples were taken periodically for 24 days for BTEX test. The results of BTEX for Natural Attenuation (NA), ISCO I and ISCO II, i.e., 15 g/l and 50 g/l of KMnO4 were analyzed and compared. Modeling simulation carried out on Natural attenuation of the same Contaminant of concern (COC) revealed a clean-up period of about 45 years. The clean-up period for ISCO I will take about 69 months while the clean-up period for ISCO II will take about 35 months.
KeywordsBTEX Natural attenuation Potassium permanganate Gasoline Tropical soil
This research was carried out through the funds given by TETFUND NATIONAL RESEARCH FUND (NRF) NIGERIA. The authors therefore acknowledge the TETFUND National Research Fund of The Prof. S.A. Ola Research Group, Federal University of Technology, Akure referenced TETF/ES/NRF/013/VOL. I for the Research Project titled “Site Remediation in Nigeria: Proven and Innovative Technologies, Recovery of Free Hydrocarbon from Soil/Groundwater”.
- Ojuri, O.O.: Geo-Environmental Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated Sites. A Case Study of Baruwa Community, Lagos, Nigeria, Ph.D. thesis (2009)Google Scholar
- Ola, S.A., Ojuri, O.O.: Remediation of Hydrocarbon Contaminated Sites. Paper presented at the 2nd ISSMGE International Lecture Tour in Environmental Geotechnics (NSE-NGA/ISSMGE), Nigeria, 14–16 January 2008Google Scholar
- Suthersan, S.: Remediation Engineering: Design Concepts. Environmental Science and Engineering Series. Lewis, Boca Raton, Florida (1996). Tóth, S.: Soilcrete – Dichtwand als vorsorgliche (1989)Google Scholar
- US Office of Water. Containment and Disposal of Large Amounts of Contaminated Water: A Support Guide for Water Utilities, EPA (4608T) EPA 817-B-12-002. September 2012 US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. (2012)Google Scholar
- Sharma, H.D., Reddy, K.R.: Geoenvironmental Engineering: Site Remediation, Waste Containment, and Emerging Waste Management Technologies. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken (2004)Google Scholar
- USEPA, Assessment of Barrier Containment Technologies, International Containment Technology Workshop, Baltimore, Maryland, 29–31 August 1995Google Scholar
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Subsurface Contamination Reference Guide, EPA/540/2-90/011, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, D.C. (1990)Google Scholar