Advertisement

Stabilization of Dispersive Soil Using Biopolymer

  • Kajal SwainEmail author
  • Mahasakti Mahamaya
  • Shamshad Alam
  • Sarat Kumar Das
Conference paper
Part of the Sustainable Civil Infrastructures book series (SUCI)

Abstract

Dispersive soils are considered as unstable, as these are easily erodible by wind and water. Structures, such as embankments, channels and foundations are vulnerable to severe erosion when this type of soil is used. Dispersive soil exhibits no strength resistance against environmental factors like air and water forces and fails rapidly during soaking as per crumb test and double hydrometer test. In the present study two biopolymers; xanthan gum in 1.0%, 2.0%, 3.0% and guar gum in of 0.5%, 1.0% and 2.0% are used for stabilization of the dispersive soil. The effects of biopolymer stabilizing agents are studied through crumb test and cylinder dispersion test for erosion control and other geotechnical properties like compaction and unconfined compression test (UCS). The optimum moisture content (OMC) of the bio treated samples increased and maximum dry density (MDD) decreased with increase in percentage of biopolymer. The bio treated samples cured in sun light for a period of 3 days shows higher unconfined compressive strength (UCS) value compared to as compacted sample and cured under ambient condition. Microstructural studies like scanning electron microscope (SEM), x-ray diffraction (XRD) and energy dispersive x-ray (EDX) tests were also conducted. The SEM analysis showed that the particles of biopolymer modified dispersive soil are bonded together by gum layer. This may be the cause of decreases in the dispersivity of the soil. Guar gum was found to be more effective than xanthan gum.

References

  1. Abbasi, N., Nazifi, M.H.: Assessment and Modification of Sherard chemical method for evaluation of dispersion potential of soils. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 31, 337–346 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Kiki, I.M., et al.: Long term strength and durability of clayey soil stabilized with lime. Eng. Tech. J. 29(4), 725–735 (2011)Google Scholar
  3. ASTM D 422- 63. Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2007)Google Scholar
  4. ASTM D1557-12e1. Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3)), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2012)Google Scholar
  5. ASTM D2166/D2166 M-16. Standard Test Method for Unconfined Compressive Strength of Cohesive Soil, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2016)Google Scholar
  6. ASTM D2487-11. Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2011)Google Scholar
  7. ASTM D4221-99. Standard Test Method for Dispersive Characteristics of Clay Soil by Double Hydrometer, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (1999)Google Scholar
  8. ASTM D4318-10e1. Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2010)Google Scholar
  9. ASTM D6572-13e2. Standard Test Methods for Determining Dispersive Characteristics of Clayey Soils by the Crumb Test, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2013)Google Scholar
  10. ASTM D854-14. Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA (2014)Google Scholar
  11. Atkinson, J.H., et al.: Examination of erosion resistance of clays in embankment dams. Q. J. Eng. Geol. 23, 103–108 (1990). LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ayeldeen, M.K., et al.: Evaluating the physical characteristics of biopolymer/soil mixtures. Arab. J. Geosci. 9, 371 (2016). doi: 10.1007/s12517-016-2366-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bhuvaneshwari, S., et al.: Stabilization and microstructural modification of dispersive clayey soils. In: First International Conference on Soil and Rock Engineering, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 5–11 August 2007Google Scholar
  14. Chen, R., et al.: Biopolymer stabilization of mine tailings. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 139(10), 1802–1807 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Das, S.K., et al.: Stabilization of pond ash using biopolymer. Procedia Earth Planet. Sci. 11, 254–259 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fell, R., et al.: Geotechnical Engineering of Embankment Dams, p. 675. A.A. Balkema Publishers, Brookfield (1992)Google Scholar
  17. Goodarzi, A.R.: Pore fluid effect on the dispersivitybehaviour and its interaction with alum as an improving material with an attention to microstructure aspects. MSc thesis, Civil Engineering Department, University of Bu-Ali Sina, Iran, p. 178 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. Goodarzi, A.R., Salimi, M.: Stabilization treatment of a dispersive clayey soil using granulated blast furnace slag and basic oxygen furnace slag. Appl. Clay Sci. 108, 61–69 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ivanov, V., Chu, J.: Applications of microorganisms to geotechnical engineering for biocloguar guming and biocementation of soil in situ. Rev. Environ. Sci. Biotechnol. 7(2), 139–153 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ludwig, H.: A study of some aspects of disperse clay particle interaction. Master thesis, McGill University, p. 201 (1979)Google Scholar
  21. Mitchell, J.K.: Fundamentals of Soil Behavior, p. 437. Wiley, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  22. Nevels, J.J.B.: Dispersive clay embankment erosion: a case history. Transp. Res. Rec. 1406, 50–57 (1993)Google Scholar
  23. Ouhadi, V.R., Goodarzi, A.R.: Assessment of the stability of a dispersive soil treated by alum. Eng. Geol. 85, 91–101 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ouhadi, V.R., Goodarzi, A.R.: Pore fluid characteristics effect on the dispersivity behavior of soils from macro and micro structure aspects. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Contaminated Sediments, Quebec City, Canada, pp. 200–206 (2003)Google Scholar
  25. Sherad, J.L., et al.: Identification and nature of dispersive soils. J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE 102, 298–312 (1976)Google Scholar
  26. Tin, J.E.: Waste management schemes of potash mine in Saskatechwan. MSc thesis, University of Saskatchewan, Canada (1984)Google Scholar
  27. Turkoz, M., et al.: The effect of magnesium chloride solution on the engineering properties of clay soil with expansive and dispersive characteristics. Appl. Clay Sci. 101, 1–9 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Umesh, T.S., et al.: Control of dispersivity of soil using lime and cement. Mater. Sci. Appl. 3, 8–15 (2009)Google Scholar
  29. Vakili, A.H., et.al.: Stabilization of dispersive soils by pozzolan. Forensic Eng. 726–735 (2013)Google Scholar
  30. Volk, G.M.: Method of determination of degree of dispersion of clay fraction of soils. In: Proceedings of Soil Science Society of America, vol. 2, p. 561 (1937)Google Scholar
  31. Yong, R.N., Sethi, A.J.: Turbidity and zeta potential measurements of clay dispersibility. ASTM STP 623, 419–431 (1977)Google Scholar
  32. Yong, R.N., Warkentin, B.P.: Introduction to Soil Behaviour, p. 451. MacMillan, New York (1966)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kajal Swain
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mahasakti Mahamaya
    • 1
  • Shamshad Alam
    • 1
  • Sarat Kumar Das
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringNITRourkelaIndia

Personalised recommendations