Advertisement

Concluding Remarks and Avenues for Future Research

  • Alessandra PerriEmail author
  • Enzo Peruffo
Chapter
  • 385 Downloads

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the most relevant findings of this volume and discusses the main contributions for both family business and innovation research streams. It proposes an integrative framework that accounts for the multifaceted relationship linking family firms and innovation output. The main limitations of this book are also discussed to open up a research agenda and stimulate future research into this promising area of inquiry.

Keywords

Family firms Innovation output Multitheoretic approach Institutional and regulatory framework 

References

  1. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 209–237.Google Scholar
  2. Bammens, Y., Voordeckers, W., & Van Gils, A. (2011). Boards of directors in family businesses: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13, 134–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binacci, M., Peruffo, E., Oriani, R., & Minichilli, A. (2016). Are All non-family managers (NFMs) equal? The impact of NFM characteristics and diversity on family firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24(6), 569–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Block, J. H. (2012). R&D investments in family and founder firms: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 248–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Block, J., Miller, D., Jaskiewicz, P., & Spiegel, F. (2013). Economic and technological importance of innovations in large family and founder firms: An analysis of patent data. Family Business Review, 26(2), 180–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 29, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55(4), 976–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dalton, D. R., Hitt, M. A., Certo, S. T., & Dalton, C. M. (2007). Chapter 1: The fundamental agency problem and its mitigation. Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 1–64.Google Scholar
  9. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20–47.Google Scholar
  10. De Massis, A., Di Minin, A., & Frattini, F. (2015). Family-driven innovation: Resolving the paradox in family firms. California Management Review, 58(1), 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duran, P., Kammerlander, N., Van Essen, M., & Zellweger, T. (2016). Doing more with less: Innovation input and output in family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1224–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dyer, W. G. (2006). Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19(4), 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gambardella, A. (2005). Patents and the division of innovative labor. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(6), 1223–1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gambardella, A., Harhoff, D., & Verspagen, B. (2008). The value of European patents. European Management Review, 5(2), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gersick, K. E., Lansberg, I., Desjardins, M., & Dunn, B. (1999). Stages and transitions: Managing change in the family business. Family Business Review, 12, 287–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Campbell, J. T., Martin, G., Hoskisson, R. E., Makri, M., & Sirmon, D. G. (2014). Socioemotional wealth as a mixed gamble: Revisiting family firm R&D investments with the behavioral agency model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(6), 1351–1374.Google Scholar
  17. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Nunez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52, 106–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Makri, M., & Larraza Kintana, M. (2010). Diversification decisions in family controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 223–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Habberson, T. G., & Williams, M. L. (1999). Are source-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools (No. w8498). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  21. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., Sarathy, R., & Murphy, F. (2012). Innovativeness in family firms: A family influence perspective. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lee, J., & Berente, N. (2012). Digital innovation and the division of innovative labor: Digital controls in the automotive industry. Organization Science, 23(5), 1428–1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lodh, S., Nandy, M., & Chen, J. (2014). Innovation and family ownership: Empirical evidence from India. Corporate Governance—An International Review, 22(1), 4–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Matzler, K., Veider, V., Hautz, J., & Stadler, C. (2015). The impact of family ownership, management, and governance on innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maury, B. (2006). Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from western european corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Miller, D., Minichilli, A., & Corbetta, G. (2013). Is family leadership always beneficial? Strategic Management Journal, 34(5), 553–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nordqvist, M., Sharma, P., & Chirico, F. (2014). Family firm heterogeneity and governance: A configuration approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 192–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Siebels, J.-F., & zu Knyphausen-Aufseß, D. (2012). A review of theory in family business research: The implications for corporate governance. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, 280–304.Google Scholar
  30. Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 172–187.Google Scholar
  31. Trajtenberg, M., Henderson, R., & Jaffe, A. (1997). University versus corporate patents: A window on the basicness of invention. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 5(1), 19–50.Google Scholar
  32. Zahra, S. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zona, F., Zattoni, A., & Minichilli, A. (2013). A contingency model of boards of directors and firm innovation: The moderating role of firm size. British Journal of Management, 24(3), 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementCa’ Foscari UniversityVeniceItaly
  2. 2.Department of Business and ManagementLUISS Guido CarliRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations