Skip to main content

A Network-Oriented Modeling Approach to Voting Behavior During the 2016 US Presidential Election

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends in Cyber-Physical Multi-Agent Systems. The PAAMS Collection - 15th International Conference, PAAMS 2017 (PAAMS 2017)

Abstract

In this paper a network-oriented computational model is presented for voting intentions over time specifically for the race between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the 2016 US presidential election. The focus was on the role of social and mass communication media and the statements made by Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton during their speeches. The aim was to investigate the influence on the voting intentions and the final voting. Sentiment analysis was performed to check whether the statements were high or low in language intensity. Simulation experiments using parameter tuning were compared to real world data (3 election polls until the 8th of November).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/milwaukee-trump-jumps-10-points-black-voters/.

  2. 2.

    http://www.danielsoper.com/sentimentanalysis/.

  3. 3.

    https://nl.mathworks.com/help/optim/ug/optimtool.html.

References

  1. Ahmadian, S., Azarshahi, S., Paulhus, D.L.: Explaining Donald Trump via communication style: Grandiosity, informality, and dynamism. Personal. Individ. Differ. 107, 49–53 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Clementson, D.E., Pascual-Ferra, P., Beatty, M.J.: When does a presidential candidate seem presidential and trustworthy? Campaign messages through the lens of language expectancy theory. Pres. Stud. Q. 46(3), 592–617 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Conway, B.A., Kenski, K., Wang, D.: Twitter use by presidential primary candidates during the 2012 campaign. Am. Behav. Sci. 57(11), 1596–1610 (2013). doi:10.1177/0002764213489014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Conway, B.A., Kenski, K., Wang, D.: The rise of Twitter in the political campaign: searching for intermedia agenda-setting effects in the presidential primary. J. Comput. Mediat. Commun. 20, 363–380 (2015). doi:10.1111/jcc4.12124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Iyengar, S., Simon, A.F.: New perspectives and evidence on political communication and campaign effects. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 51(1), 149–169 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jungherr, A.: Twitter use in election campaigns: a systematic literature review. J. Inf. Technol. Polit. 13, 72–91 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuipers, B.J.: Commonsense reasoning about causality: deriving behavior from structure. Artif. Intell. 24(1984), 169–203 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lilleker, D.G., Jackson, N.A.: Political Campaigning, Elections and the Internet: Comparing the U.S., U.K., France and Germany. Routledge, New York (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pearl, J.: Causality. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Port, R.F., van Gelder, T.: Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Towner, T.L., Dulio, D.A.: New media and political marketing in the United States: 2012 and beyond. J. Polit. Mark. 11, 95–119 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Treur, J.: Network-Oriented Modeling: Addressing Complexity of Cognitive, Affective and Social Interactions. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Treur, J.: Dynamic modeling based on a temporal-causal network modeling approach. Biol Inspir. Cogn. Archit. 16, 131–168 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wright, S.: Correlation and causation. J. Agric. Res. 20, 557–585 (1921)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan Treur .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Polls by McClatchy-Marist

First poll: https://www.scribd.com/document/320225575/McClatchy-Marist-Poll-National-Nature-of-the-Sample-and-Tables-August-2016

Second poll: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article103597232.ece/BINARY/The\%20full\\%20McClatchy-Marist\%20poll

Third poll: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/news/politics-government/election/article112635043.ece/BINARY/Full\%20poll\\%20results

Transcripts of Donald Trump

June 22nd: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/06/transcript-trump-speech-on-the-stakes-of-the-election-224654

July 21st: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/07/full-transcript-donald-trump-nomination-acceptance-speech-at-rnc-225974

July 27th: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/07/27/donald-trumps-falsehood-laden-press-conference-annotated

August 18th: www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/08/18/watch_live_donald_trump_gives_first_campaign_speech_since_hiring_stephen_bannon.html

August 31st: http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-donald-trump-immigration-speech-transcript-20160831-snap-htmlstory.html

September 15th: http://time.com/4495507/donald-trump-economy-speech-transcript/

October 2nd: http://thoughtsonthedead.com/transcript-of-donald-j-trumps-speech-in-manheim-pa-10116/

October 13th: http://www.npr.org/2016/10/13/497857068/transcript-donald-trumps-speech-responding-to-assault-accusations

October 22nd: http://www.whatthefolly.com/2016/10/26/transcript-donald-trumps-speech-in-gettysburg-pennsylvania-part-1/

Transcripts of Hillary Clinton

June 7th: http://bluenationreview.com/full-transcript-of-hillary-clintons-june-7-victory-speech/

July 18th: http://fortune.com/2016/07/18/hillary-clinton-speech-naacp-transcript/

July 28th: http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/29/us/politics/hillary-clinton-dnc-transcript.html?_r=0

August 11th: http://europe.newsweek.com/hillary-clinton-full-transcript-economic-speech-489602?rm=eu

August 25th: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/08/transcript-hillary-clinton-alt-right-reno-227419

September 15th: http://www.whatthefolly.com/2016/09/15/transcript-hillary-clintons-speech-in-greensboro-north-carolina-part-1/

October 3rd: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=119154

October 11th: http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories/local/2016/10/11/hillary-clintons-speech-at-ohio-state.html

October 26th: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=119693

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Goedschalk, L., Treur, J., Verwolf, R. (2018). A Network-Oriented Modeling Approach to Voting Behavior During the 2016 US Presidential Election. In: De la Prieta, F., et al. Trends in Cyber-Physical Multi-Agent Systems. The PAAMS Collection - 15th International Conference, PAAMS 2017. PAAMS 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 619. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61578-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61578-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61577-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61578-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics