Skip to main content

Rearticulating Arts, Research, and Education from the Disciplinary to the Affective in Public Arts Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Arts-Research-Education

Part of the book series: Studies in Arts-Based Educational Research ((SABER,volume 1))

Abstract

The residual meanings attached to the arts emerge through histories that have maintained disciplinary difference between dance, music, art, drama. This modernist persistence affects intellectual and corporeal innovation in school-based arts so how might a rearticulation of arts practices, as well as research and education procedures from the disciplinary to the affective bring about new conceptual and processual possibilities? How might this rearticulation bring about new conceptual understandings about what arts education, arts practice, arts research can be? Two distinctly different examples of urban-based arts projects: David Bowie; and Out of the Box children’s arts festival are rearticulated through affect. While each project, when thought about in a disciplinary sense is wildly different, reconceptualising them through affect helps to consider new arts education futures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allan, J. (2013). Staged interventions: deleuze, arts and education. In I. Semetsky & D. Masny (Eds.), Deleuze and education (pp. 37–53). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barone, T., & Eisner, E. (2012). Arts-based research. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlant, L. (2010). Cruel optimism. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 93–117). London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, D. (2008). Touching minds and hearts: community arts as collaborative research. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 351–362). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresler, L. (2003). School art as a hybrid genre: institutional contexts for art curriculum. In L. Bresler & C. M. Thompson (Eds.), The arts in children’s lives (pp. 169–183). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahnmann-Taylor, M., & Siegesmund, R. (Eds.) (2008). Arts-based research in education: Foundations for practice. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clough, P. T. (2010). The affective turn: political economy, biomedia, and bodies. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 206–225.). London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coutts, G., & Jokela, T. (Eds.) (2008). Art, community and environment: educational perspectives. Bristol: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, S. (2005). Critical enquiry in art in the primary school. In R. Hickman (Ed.), Critical studies in art & design education (pp. 105–117.). Bristol: Intellect.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fineberg, C. (2004). Creating islands of excellence: arts education as a partner in school reform. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, K. (2008). The art of methodology: a collaborative science. In K. Gallagher (Ed), The methodological dilemma: creative, critical and collaborative approaches to qualitative research (pp. 67–81.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gandini, L., Hill, L., Cadwell, L., & Schwal, C. (Eds). (2005). In the spirit of the studio: learning from the Atelier of Reggio Emilia. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R., & Ewing, R. (2011). Transforming the curriculum through the arts. South Yarra: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grierson, E. M., & Mansfield, J. M. (Eds). (2003). The arts in education: critical perspectives from Aotearoa New Zealand. Palmerston: Dunmore Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (2014). The creative turn: toward a new aesthetic imaginary. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey-Moody, A. (2013). Youth, arts, and education: reassembling subjectivity through affect. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, L. (2008). Women’s studies and arts-informed research: some Australian examples. In J. G. Knowles & A. L. Cole (Eds.), Handbook of the arts in qualitative research (pp. 557–568.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotzas J. (2014). Media statements: acting Minister for Science, Information Technology, Innovation and the Arts. The Honourable John-Paul Langbroek. Out of the Box opens up the arts for children. Wednesday, June 25, 2014. http://statements.qld.gov.au/Statement/2014/6/25/out-of-the-box-opens-up-the-arts-for-children. Accessed 26 Jan 2016.

  • Livingstone, J. (2012). Personal correspondance. Email, 18th June 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, J. (Ed). (2008). Researching education: visually - digitally - spatially. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pente, P. (2004). Reflections on artist/researcher/teacher identities: a game of cards. In R. L. Irwin & A. de Cosson (Eds.), A/r/tography: rendering self through arts-based living inquiry (pp. 91–102.). Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peraino J. A. (2012). Plumbing the surface of sound and vision: David Bowie, Andy Warhol, and the art of posing. Qui Parle: Critical Humanities and Social Sciences, 21(1), 151–184. University of Nebraska Press. Accessed 14 Jan 2016, from Project MUSE database.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, K. (1982). The arts in schools: principles, practice and provision. London: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheider, W. (2013). Theatre is education for development. In E. Liebau, E. Wagner & M. Wyman (Eds.), International yearbook for research in arts education 1, (233–238.). Munster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, W. (Ed). (1996). Issues in expressive arts, curriculum for early childhood: an Australian perspective. Amsterdam: Gordon & Breach Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seigworth, G. J., & Gregg, M. (2010). An inventory of shimmers. In M. Gregg & G. J. Seigworth (Eds.), The affect theory reader (pp. 1–25). London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. A. (2015). Posthumanism and educational research. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Springgay, S., Irwin, R. L., Leggo, C., & Gouzouaisis, P. (2008). Being with a/r/tography. Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda Knight .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Knight, L. (2018). Rearticulating Arts, Research, and Education from the Disciplinary to the Affective in Public Arts Practices. In: Knight, L., Lasczik Cutcher, A. (eds) Arts-Research-Education. Studies in Arts-Based Educational Research, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61560-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61560-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61559-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61560-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics