Skip to main content

Targeting Sedentary Behaviour at the Policy Level

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Epidemiology and Public Health ((SSEH))

Abstract

Policy level approaches are a promising and potentially powerful way to reduce sedentary behaviour at a population level. Ecological models have typically been used to reduce sedentary behaviour at a policy level. These focus on specific settings where policies may be present. This chapter examines home, workplace, education, transportation, healthcare, and nonhome-based leisure settings where sedentary behaviour reduction can be targeted at a policy level and the accompanying evidence for such policies along with important supporting factors. For policies to be effective in these settings, they also require shifting strong social norms to sit and should focus on benefits broader than health, such as increased productivity and academic learning and reduced traffic congestion. Government guidelines are a key policy component as are recommendations from non-government organizations. Current sedentary behaviour guidelines and stakeholder recommendations are summarised. A description of the national physical activity report cards is provided as an example of a successful policy initiative driving sedentary behaviour reduction in many countries. Limitations of the existing evidence and recommendations for future research are also included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. Schmid TL, Pratt M, Howze E. Policy as intervention: environmental and policy approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular disease. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(9):1207–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Owen N, Sugiyama T, Eakin EE, Gardiner PA, Tremblay MS, Sallis JF. Adults’ sedentary behavior determinants and interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2011;41(2):189–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Owen N, Healy GN, Matthews CE, Dunstan D. Too much sitting: the population health science of sedentary behavior. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010;38(3):105–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization. Report of the commission on ending childhood obesity, Geneva. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. 4th ed. San Francisco: Wiley; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sallis JF, Owen N. Physical activity and behavioural medicine. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Manini TM, Carr LJ, King AC, Marshall S, Robinson TN, Rejeski WJ. Interventions to reduce sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015;47(6):1306–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Robinson TN, Sirard JR. Preventing childhood obesity: a solution-oriented research paradigm. Am J Prev Med. 2005;28(2 Suppl 2):194–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tonge KL, Jones RA, Okely AD. Correlates of children’s objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behavior in early childhood education and care services: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2016;89:129–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Neelon SEB, Taveras EM, Østbye T, Gillman MW. Preventing obesity in infants and toddlers in child care: results from a pilot randomized controlled trial. Matern Child Health J. 2014;18(5):1246–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Puder J, Marques-Vidal P, Schindler C, Zahner L, Niederer I, Bürgi J, et al. Effect of multidimensional lifestyle intervention on fitness and adiposity in predominantly migrant preschool children (Ballabeina): cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2011;343:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sallis JF, Owen N. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM, editors. Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002. p. 462–84.

    Google Scholar 

  13. US National Physical Activity Plan Coordinating Committee. National Physical Activity Plan for the United States. 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  14. National Heart Foundation of Australia. Blueprint for an active Australia. Melbourne: National Heart Foundation of Australia; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dietz WH, Gortmaker SL. Preventing obesity in children and adolescents. Annu Rev Public Health. 2001;22:337–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gortmaker SL, Cheung LWY, Peterson KE, Chomitz G, Cradle JH, Dart H, et al. Impact of a school-based interdisciplinary intervention on diet and physical activity among urban primary school children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999;153:975–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hinkley T, Cliff DP, Okely AD. Reducing electronic media use in 2–3 year-old children: feasibility and efficacy of the Family@ play pilot randomised controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson TN, Borzekowski DLG. Effects of the SMART classroom curriculum to reduce child and family screen time. J Commun. 2006;56(1):1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cornelius M, Carrie Armel K, Hoffman K, Allen L, Bryson SW, Desai M, et al. Increasing energy- and greenhouse gas-saving behaviors among adolescents: a school-based cluster-randomized controlled trial. Energ Effic. 2014;7:217–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jancey JM, McGann S, Creagh R, Blackford KD, Howat P, Tye M. Workplace building design and office-based workers’ activity: a study of a natural experiment. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2016;40(1):78–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ucci M, Law S, Andrews R, Fisher A, Smith L, Sawyer A, et al. Indoor school environments, physical activity, sitting behaviour and pedagogy: a scoping review. Build Res Inf. 2015;43(5):566–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. British Heart Foundation National Centre. Sedentary behaviour: evidence briefing. Loughborough University, Loughborough: British Heart Foundation National Centre; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tremblay MS, LeBlanc AG, Carson V, Choquette L, Connor Gorber S, Dillman C, et al. Canadian sedentary behaviour guidelines for the early years (aged 0–4 years). Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012;37(2):370–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Department of Health PA, Health Improvement and Protection. Start active, stay active – a report on physical activity for health from the four home countries’ Chief Medical Officers, London. 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Thorp A, Dunstan D, Clark B, Gardiner P, Healy G, Keegel T, et al. Stand up Australia: sedentary behaviour in workers. Melbourne: Medibank; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Crespo NC, Sallis JF, Conway TL, Saelens BE, Frank LD. Worksite physical activity policies and environments in relation to employee physical activity. Am J Health Promot. 2011;25(4):264–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shrestha N, Kukkonen-Harjula KT, Verbeek JH, Ijaz S, Hermans V, Bhaumik S. Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;3:CD010912.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Van Sluijs EM, Jones NR, Jones AP, Sharp SJ, Harrison F, Griffin SJ. School-level correlates of physical activity intensity in 10-year-old children. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2011;6(2–2):e574–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hinckson E, Salmon J, Benden M, Clemes SA, Sudholz B, Barber SE, et al. Standing classrooms: research and lessons learned from around the world. Sports Med. 2015:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Minges KE, Chao AM, Irwin ML, Owen N, Park C, Whittemore R, et al. Classroom standing desks and sedentary behavior: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2016;137(2):e20153087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Parrish AM, Cliff DP, Salmon J, Trost SG, Batterham M, Okely AD. Breaking up prolonged sitting among secondary school students: the stand up for health cluster randomized controlled trial. 2016 (under review).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Morton KL, Atkin AJ, Corder K, Suhrcke M, van Sluijs EM. The school environment and adolescent physical activity and sedentary behaviour: a mixed-studies systematic review. Obes Rev. 2016;17(2):142–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Parrish AM, Okely AD, Batterham M, Cliff D, Magee C. PACE: a group randomised controlled trial to increase children’s break-time playground physical activity. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(5):413–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bocarro JN, Kanters MA, Cerin E, Floyd MF, Casper JM, Suau LJ, et al. School sport policy and school-based physical activity environments and their association with observed physical activity in middle school children. Health Place. 2012;18(1):31–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lanningham-Foster L, Foster RC, McCrady SK, Manohar CU, Jensen TB, Mitre NG, et al. Changing the school environment to increase physical activity in children. Obesity. 2008;16(8):1849–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Erinosho T, Hales D, Vaughn A, Mazzucca S, Ward DS. Impact of policies on physical activity and screen time practices in 50 child-care centers in North Carolina. J Phys Act Health. 2016;13(1):59–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hesketh KR, van Sluijs EM. Features of the UK childcare environment and associations with preschooler’s in-care physical activity. Prev Med Rep. 2016;3:53–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Finch M, Wolfenden L, Falkiner M, Edenden D, Pond N, Hardy LL, et al. Impact of a population based intervention to increase the adoption of multiple physical activity practices in centre based childcare services: a quasi experimental, effectiveness study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012;9:101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lyn R, Maalouf J, Evers S, Davis J, Griffin M. Nutrition and physical activity in child care centers: the impact of a wellness policy initiative on environment and policy assessment and observation outcomes, 2011. Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. De Silva-Sanigorski A, Elea D, Bell C, Kremer P, Carpenter L, Nichols M, et al. Obesity prevention in the family day care setting: impact of the Romp & Chomp intervention on opportunities for children’s physical activity and healthy eating. Child Care Health Dev. 2011;37(3):385–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jones J, Wyse R, Finch M, Lecathelinais C, Wiggers J, Marshall J, et al. Effectiveness of an intervention to facilitate the implementation of healthy eating and physical activity policies and practices in childcare services: a randomised controlled trial. Implement Sci. 2015;10:147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Carson V, Clark D, Ogden N, Harber V, Kuzik N. Short-term influence of revised provincial accreditation standards on physical activity, sedentary behavior, and weight status in Alberta, Canada child care centers. Early Childhood Educ J. 2015;43(6):459–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Staton S, Smith S, Pattinson C, Thorpe K. Mandatory naptimes and group napping trajectories in childcare: an observational study. 2014 (unpublished manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pattinson CL, Staton SL, Smith SS, Sinclair DM, Thorpe KJ. Emotional climate and behavioral management during sleep time in early childhood education settings. Early Child Res Q. 2015;29:660–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Beets MW, Beighle A, Erwin HE, Huberty JL. After-school program impact on physical activity and fitness: a meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(6):527–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Robinson TN, Killen JD, Kraemer HC, Wilson DM, Matheson DM. Dance and reducing television viewing to prevent weight gain in African–American girls: the Stanford GEMS pilot study. Ethn Dis. 2003;13(Suppl 1):S1-65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ajja R, Clennin MN, Weaver RG, Moore JB, Huberty JL, Ward DS, et al. Association of environment and policy characteristics on children’s moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and time spent sedentary in afterschool programs. Prev Med. 2014;69(Suppl 1):S49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Beets MW, Huberty J, Beighle A, Moore JB, Webster C, Ajja R, et al. Impact of policy environment characteristics on physical activity and sedentary behaviors of children attending afterschool programs. Health Educ Behav. 2013;40(3):296–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Beets MW, Weaver RG, Turner-McGrievy G, Huberty J, Ward DS, Pate RR, et al. Making policy practice in afterschool programs: a randomized controlled trial on physical activity changes. Am J Prev Med. 2015;48(6):694–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. California Department of Education. California after school physical activity guidelines. Sacramento, CA: California Department of Education; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Koohsari MJ, Sugiyama T, Kaczynski AT, Owen N. Associations of leisure-time sitting in cars with neighborhood walkability. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11(6):1129–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Koohsari MJ, Sugiyama T, Sahlqvist S, Mavoa S, Hadgraft N, Owen N. Neighborhood environmental attributes and adults’ sedentary behaviors: review and research agenda. Prev Med. 2015;77:141–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Sugiyama T, Merom D, van der Ploeg HP, Corpuz G, Bauman A, Owen N. Prolonged sitting in cars: prevalence, socio-demographic variations, and trends. Prev Med. 2012;55(4):315–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Heath GW, Brownson RC, Kruger J, Miles R, Powell KE, Ramsey LT, et al. The effectiveness of urban design and land use and transport policies and practices to increase physical activity: a systematic review. J Phys Act Health. 2006;3:S55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Heath GW, Parra DC, Sarmiento OL, Andersen LB, Owen N, Goenka S, et al. Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: lessons from around the world. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):272–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Bergman P, Grjibovski AM, Hagströmer M, Patterson E, Sjöström M. Congestion road tax and physical activity. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38(2):171–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Brown V, Moodie M, Carter R. Congestion pricing and active transport – evidence from five opportunities for natural experiment. J Transp Health. 2015;2(4):568–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Coombes JS, Law J, Lancashire B, Fassett RG. “Exercise is medicine”: curbing the burden of chronic disease and physical inactivity. Asia Pac J Public Health. 2015;27(2):NP600–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Tremblay MS, Haskell WL. From science to physical activity guidelines. In: Bouchard C, Blair SN, Haskell WL, editors. Physical activity and health. 2nd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2012. p. 359–78.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Tremblay MS, Gray CE, Akinroye K, Harrington DM, Katzmarzyk PT, Lambert EV, et al. Physical activity of children: a global matrix of grades comparing 15 countries. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11(Suppl 1):S113–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Sallis JF, Owen N, Fisher EB. Ecological models of health behavior. In: Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice, vol. 4. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2008. p. 465–86.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anthony D. Okely .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Okely, A.D., Tremblay, M.S., Hammersley, M., Aubert, S. (2018). Targeting Sedentary Behaviour at the Policy Level. In: Leitzmann, M., Jochem, C., Schmid, D. (eds) Sedentary Behaviour Epidemiology. Springer Series on Epidemiology and Public Health. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61552-3_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61552-3_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61550-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61552-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics