Skip to main content

Mammography

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 3405 Accesses

Part of the book series: Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering ((BIOMEDICAL))

Abstract

Statistics show that about one in eight women will develop invasive breast cancer in her lifetime in the United States. While there has been a decline in the mortality rate from breast cancer in recent years, it is still the second leading cause of cancer death in women according to the American Cancer Society (Siegel et al. 2014). The bright side is that breast cancer is one of the most treatable malignancies when detected early. If a patient’s breast cancer is discovered and diagnosed in its early stages when tumors are small and local, the chance for successful treatment is close to 100%. Therefore, early detection of abnormal breast lesions is crucial for patient’s long-term survival and thus reducing mortality (Swedish Organized Service Screening Evaluation, G 2006; Tabar et al. 2003; Tabar et al. 2011). Most cancer experts agree that among a variety of breast screening technologies, mammography is currently the most effective image modality for the early detection of breast cancer for its high sensitivity, excellent benefit to risk ratio, low cost, and low radiation exposure (Nyström et al. 2002; Tabar et al. 2003). Regular mammograms are recommended as a preventive measure for at-risk women and any woman aged over 40 in the states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Feig SA, Yaffe MJ (1995) Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography. Radiol Clin N Am 33(6):1205–1230

    Google Scholar 

  • Haus AG, Jaskulski SM (1997) The basics of film processing in medical imaging. Medical Physics Pub Corp, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Haus AG, Yaffe MJ (eds) (1994) Syllabus: a categorical course in physics: technical aspects of breast imaging. RSNA, Oak Brook, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Huda W, Sajewicz AM, Ogden KM, Dance DR (2003) Experimental investigation of the dose and image quality characteristics of a digital mammography imaging system. Med Phys 30(3):442–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johns PC, Yaffe MJ (1987) X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. Phys Med Biol 32(6):675–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyström L, Andersson I, Bjurstam N, Frisell J, Nordenskjöld B, Rutqvist LE (2002) Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 359(9310):909–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ, Hemminger BM, Hendrick RE, Niklason LT, Maidment AD, Kimme-Smith CM, Feig SA, Sickles EA, Braeuning MP (2000) Current status of full-field digital mammography. Acad Radiol 7(4):266–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ, Kuzmiak CM (eds) (2004) Digital mammography. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadephia

    Google Scholar 

  • Popli MB (2001) Pictorial essay : mammographic features of breast cancer. Indian J Radiol Imaging 11:175–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders RS, Samei E (2008) The effect of breast compression on mass conspicuity in digital mammography. Med Phys 35(10):4464–4473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A (2014) Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64(1):9–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swedish Organised Service Screening Evaluation, G (2006) Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 15(1):45–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabar L, Yen MF, Vitak B, Chen HH, Smith RA, Duffy SW (2003) Mammography service screening and mortality in breast cancer patients: 20-year follow-up before and after introduction of screening. Lancet 361(9367):1405–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabar L, Vitak B, Chen TH, Yen AM, Cohen A, Tot T, Chiu SY, Chen SL, Fann JC, Rosell J, Fohlin H, Smith RA, Duffy SW (2011) Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Australas Radiol 260(3):658–663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ongeval C, Bosmans H, Van Steen A (2006) Current status of digital mammography for screening and diagnosis of breast cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 18(6):547–554

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren SL (1930) A Roentgenologic study of the breast. Am JRoentgenol Radium Ther 24:113–124

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bing Ma PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ma, B. (2017). Mammography. In: Maqbool, M. (eds) An Introduction to Medical Physics. Biological and Medical Physics, Biomedical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61540-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics