# The Coordinated Movements of a Learning Assemblage: Secondary School Students Exploring Wii Graphing Technology

## Abstract

This chapter uses assemblage theory to investigate how students engage with graphing technology to explore mathematical relationships. We use the term ‘learning assemblage’ to describe provisional dynamic physical arrangements involving humans and other bodies moving together and learning together. Emphasis on dynamic coordinated movements allows us to study how mathematics learning occurs in complex interaction with technology. We tap into the rich concept of ‘sympathy’ to understand the way that students develop a feeling for these coordinated movements as they participate collaboratively in mathematical investigations. Through sympathetic movements, a learning assemblage sustains a kind of *affective agreement* amongst the various bodies that participate. We show how assemblage theory helps us rethink the role of affect in technology tool use. This chapter sheds light on innovative ways of theorizing the role of Wii graphing technology in mathematical practice.

## References

- Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work.
*International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning,**7,*245–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spaceTime enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come.
*Derrida Today, 3*(2), 240–68.Google Scholar - Baron, M., Guin, D., & Trouche, L. (2007).
*Environnements informatisés et ressources numériques pour l’apprentissage: conception et usages, regards croisés*. Paris, France: Hermès.Google Scholar - Bartolini Bussi, M.G., & Mariotti, M.A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. D. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.),
*Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education*(pp. 746–783). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar - Bennett, J. (2010).
*Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things*. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar - Borba, M. C., & Villareal, M. E. (2005).
*Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: Information and communication technologies, modeling, visualization and experimentation*. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar - Buchanan, I. (2015). Assemblage theory and its discontents.
*Deleuze Studies,**9*(3), 382–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Chorney, S. (2014). From agency to narrative: Tools in mathematical learning.
*Ph.D. Dissertation*. Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar - Coole, (2010). The inertia of matter and the generativity of flesh. In D. H. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.),
*New materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics*(pp. 92–115). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - de Freitas, E. (2012). The diagram as story: Unfolding the event-structure of the mathematical diagram.
*For the Learning of Mathematics,**32*(2), 27–33.Google Scholar - de Freitas, E. (2014). How theories of perception deploy the line: Reconfiguring students’ bodies through topo-philosophy.
*Educational Theory,**64*(3), 285–301.Google Scholar - de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014).
*Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom*. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - DeLanda, M. (2006).
*A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity*. London, UK & New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar - DeLanda, M. (2011).
*Philosophy and simulation: The emergence of synthetic reason*. London, UK & New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar - Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007).
*Dialogues II*. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar - Edwards, C. H. (1979).
*The historical development of the calculus*. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar - Ferrara, F., & Ferrari, G. (2015). Becoming mathematical subjects by playing mathematical instruments: Gibbous lines with WiiGraph. In S. Carreira & N. Amado (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching*(pp. 378–386). Faro, Portugal: Faculty of Sciences and Technology of the University of Algarve.Google Scholar - Fox, N. J. (2011). Boundary objects, social meanings and the success of new technologies.
*Sociology,**45*(1), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Hegedus, S. J., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2008). Intersecting representation and communication infrastructures.
*ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41*(4), 399–412.Google Scholar - Mazzei, L. (2013). Materialist mappings of knowing in being: researcher constituted in the production of knowledge.
*Gender and Education,**25*(6), 776–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Nemirovsky, R. (2003). Three conjectures concerning the relationship between body activity and understanding mathematics. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.),
*Proceedings of the 27th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education*(Vol. 1, pp. 103–135). Honolulu, HI: PME.Google Scholar - Nemirovsky, R., Bryant, C., & Meloney, M. (2012).
*WiiGraph user guide. center for research in mathematics and science education*. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University.Google Scholar - Roth, W. M. (2015). Excess of graphical thinking: Movement, mathematics and flow.
*For the Learning of Mathematics, 35*(1), 2–7.Google Scholar - Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2012). Movement and mirror neurons: A challenging and choice conversation.
*Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences,**11*(3), 385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar - Streeck, J. (2013). Interaction and the living body.
*The Journal of Pragmatics,**46,*69–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar