Abstract
This chapter uses assemblage theory to investigate how students engage with graphing technology to explore mathematical relationships. We use the term ‘learning assemblage’ to describe provisional dynamic physical arrangements involving humans and other bodies moving together and learning together. Emphasis on dynamic coordinated movements allows us to study how mathematics learning occurs in complex interaction with technology. We tap into the rich concept of ‘sympathy’ to understand the way that students develop a feeling for these coordinated movements as they participate collaboratively in mathematical investigations. Through sympathetic movements, a learning assemblage sustains a kind of affective agreement amongst the various bodies that participate. We show how assemblage theory helps us rethink the role of affect in technology tool use. This chapter sheds light on innovative ways of theorizing the role of Wii graphing technology in mathematical practice.
References
Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7, 245–274.
Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spaceTime enfoldings, and Justice-to-Come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–68.
Baron, M., Guin, D., & Trouche, L. (2007). Environnements informatisés et ressources numériques pour l’apprentissage: conception et usages, regards croisés. Paris, France: Hermès.
Bartolini Bussi, M.G., & Mariotti, M.A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. D. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of International Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 746–783). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Borba, M. C., & Villareal, M. E. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking: Information and communication technologies, modeling, visualization and experimentation. New York, NY: Springer.
Buchanan, I. (2015). Assemblage theory and its discontents. Deleuze Studies, 9(3), 382–392.
Chorney, S. (2014). From agency to narrative: Tools in mathematical learning. Ph.D. Dissertation. Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University.
Coole, (2010). The inertia of matter and the generativity of flesh. In D. H. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics (pp. 92–115). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
de Freitas, E. (2012). The diagram as story: Unfolding the event-structure of the mathematical diagram. For the Learning of Mathematics, 32(2), 27–33.
de Freitas, E. (2014). How theories of perception deploy the line: Reconfiguring students’ bodies through topo-philosophy. Educational Theory, 64(3), 285–301.
de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London, UK & New York, NY: Continuum.
DeLanda, M. (2011). Philosophy and simulation: The emergence of synthetic reason. London, UK & New York, NY: Continuum.
Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Edwards, C. H. (1979). The historical development of the calculus. New York, NY: Springer.
Ferrara, F., & Ferrari, G. (2015). Becoming mathematical subjects by playing mathematical instruments: Gibbous lines with WiiGraph. In S. Carreira & N. Amado (Eds.), Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching (pp. 378–386). Faro, Portugal: Faculty of Sciences and Technology of the University of Algarve.
Fox, N. J. (2011). Boundary objects, social meanings and the success of new technologies. Sociology, 45(1), 70–85.
Hegedus, S. J., & Moreno-Armella, L. (2008). Intersecting representation and communication infrastructures. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 41(4), 399–412.
Mazzei, L. (2013). Materialist mappings of knowing in being: researcher constituted in the production of knowledge. Gender and Education, 25(6), 776–785.
Nemirovsky, R. (2003). Three conjectures concerning the relationship between body activity and understanding mathematics. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 27th conference of the international group for the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1, pp. 103–135). Honolulu, HI: PME.
Nemirovsky, R., Bryant, C., & Meloney, M. (2012). WiiGraph user guide. center for research in mathematics and science education. San Diego, CA: San Diego State University.
Roth, W. M. (2015). Excess of graphical thinking: Movement, mathematics and flow. For the Learning of Mathematics, 35(1), 2–7.
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (2012). Movement and mirror neurons: A challenging and choice conversation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 11(3), 385–401.
Streeck, J. (2013). Interaction and the living body. The Journal of Pragmatics, 46, 69–90.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
de Freitas, E., Ferrara, F., Ferrari, G. (2017). The Coordinated Movements of a Learning Assemblage: Secondary School Students Exploring Wii Graphing Technology. In: Faggiano, E., Ferrara, F., Montone, A. (eds) Innovation and Technology Enhancing Mathematics Education. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61488-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61488-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61487-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61488-5
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)