Advertisement

Use of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in the Management of Bladder Pain Syndrome

  • Magnus FallEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Our study, presented at different stages [1–3], was of a pilot character but in this connection there were a substantial number of patients, 60 men and women in the final report, published a few years after the book on Interstitial Cystitis. There were and still remain many unsolved technical issues e.g. about the most efficacious electrical parameters to use, about optimal electrode shape and positioning, including the problem how to best overcome sensory limitations of percutaneous electrical stimulation, and also about the choice of most appropriate nerve afferents for an optimal effect; stimulation efficacy depends on the size of the responsible afferent nerve and the distance to the stimulating electrode as well as the selection of optimal electrical parameters for the desired effect [4]. We used standard TENS equipment, and cannot be sure that it was best suited for the effect we aimed to attain. It is should also be noted that there were no experimental studies as to treatment with this modality on this indication. More in-depth investigation of factors mentioned above would maybe have further improved the outcome; such studies are still feasible.

Keywords

Bladder Pain Syndrome Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Optimal Electrode Shapes Percutaneous Electrical Stimulation Classic Interstitial Cystitis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Fall M. Conservative management of chronic interstitial cystitis: transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and transurethral resection. J Urol. 1985;133:774–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fall M. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in interstitial cystitis. Update on clinical experience. Urology. 1987;29(4 Suppl):40–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fall M, Lindstrom S. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation in classic and nonulcer interstitial cystitis. Urol Clin North Am. 1994;21(1):131–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fall M, Lindström S. Electrical stimulation. A physiologic approach to the treatment of urinary incontinence. Urol Clin North Am. 1991;18:393–407.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    van de Merwe JP, Nordling J, Bouchelouche P, Bouchelouche K, Cervigni M, Daha LK, et al. Diagnostic criteria, classification, and nomenclature for painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis: an ESSIC proposal. Eur Urol. 2008;53(1):60–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fall M, Carlsson CA, Erlandson BE. Electrical stimulation in interstitial cystitis. J Urol. 1980;123:192–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    van Balken MR, Vandoninck V, Gisolf KW, Vergunst H, Kiemeney LA, Debruyne FM, et al. Posterior tibial nerve stimulation as neuromodulative treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction. J Urol. 2001;166:914–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marinkovic S, Gillen L, Marinkovic C. Minimum 6-year outcomes for interstitial cystitis treated with sacral neuromodulation. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(4):407–12. Epub 2010 Sep 17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Peters KM, Feber KM, Bennett RC. A prospective, single-blind, randomized crossover trial of sacral vs pudendal nerve stimulation for interstitial cystitis. BJU Int. 2007;100(4):835–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nickel JC, Jain P, Shore N, Anderson J, Giesing D, Lee H, et al. Continuous intravesical lidocaine treatment for interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: safety and efficacy of a new drug delivery device. Sci Transl Med. 2012;18(4):143.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Urology Institute of Clinical SciencesSahlgrenska Academy at the University of GothenburgGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations