Advertisement

Social Risk and Business Risk in Mining Projects

  • Geordan GraetzEmail author
  • Daniel M. Franks
Chapter
Part of the The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific book series (PEAP)

Abstract

In this chapter, we argue that conceiving of social risk as the risk(s) to businesses conflates social risk with the better known concept of business risk and, in so doing, potentially will have negative consequences for both businesses and host communities. Contributing, then, to a contemporary theorisation of social risk, this chapter is organised in five sections. The present section provides the context of the work, while the following section reviews the literature on risk and discretely conceptualises social risk and business risk associated with mining projects. It also addresses the processes through which impacts and risks are identified. The third section examines the relationships between risks, rights, and impacts, as well as translation mechanisms and what we term ‘mediators’ of risk. The fourth section discusses the consequences of conflating social risk with business risk, while the fifth section concludes the chapter.

Abbreviation

CSR

Corporate social responsibility

Notes

Acknowledgements

This chapter is an edited version of a paper published in the Journal of Risk Research. The original paper may be cited as: Geordan Graetz and Daniel M. Franks (2016): Conceptualising social risk and business risk associated with private sector development projects, Journal of Risk Research, 19(5).

References

  1. Amit, R., Wernerfelt, B. (1990). Why do firms reduce business risk? The Academy of Management Journal, 33(3), 520-533.Google Scholar
  2. Aven, T., Renn, O. (2009). On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain. Journal of Risk Research, 12(1), 1-11.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, D., Watt, J. (2013). The risk to the public of tree fall. Journal of Risk Research, 16(2), 261-269.Google Scholar
  4. Bekefi, T., Jenkins, B., Kytle, B. (2006). Social risk as strategic risk. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative, Working Paper No. 30. Cambridge, MA: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/m-rcbg/CSRI/publications/workingpaper_30_bekefietal.pdf. Accessed 4 March 2013.
  5. Botvin, G., Botvin, E. (1992). Adolescent tobacco, alcohol, and drug abuse: prevention strategies: empirical findings, and assessment issues. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 13(4), 290-301.Google Scholar
  6. Brenot, J., Bonnefous, S. and Marris, C. (1998). Testing the culture theory in France. Risk Analysis, 18(6), 729-739.Google Scholar
  7. Burdge, R., Vanclay, F. (1995). Social impact assessment. In F. Vanclay and D. Bronstein (Eds), Environmental and social impact assessment (pp. 31-66). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Collins, J. (2010). Mobile phone masts, social rationalities and risk: negotiating lay perspectives on technological hazards. Journal of Risk Research, 13(5), 621-637.Google Scholar
  9. Dunn, J. (2000). The cunning of unreason: making sense of politics. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  10. Esteves A., Franks, D., Vanclay, F. (2012). Social impact assessment: the state of the art. Impact assessment and project appraisal, 30(1), 34-42.Google Scholar
  11. Fombrun, C., van Riel, C. (1997). The reputational landscape. Corporate Reputation Review, 1(1), 5-13.Google Scholar
  12. Fombrun, C., Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233-258.Google Scholar
  13. Franks, D., Davis, R., Bebbington, A., Ali, S., Kemp, D., Scurrah, M. (2014). Conflict translates environmental and social risk into business costs. PNAS, http://www.pnas.org/content/early/2014/05/08/1405135111.abstract. Consulted 29 July 2014: 7576-7581. Accessed 7 March 2014.
  14. Freedman, M., Stagliano, A. (2002). Environmental disclosure by companies involved in initial public offerings. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(1), 94-105.Google Scholar
  15. Friedman, M. (1970, September 13). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine. Google Scholar
  16. Golec, J., Tamarkin, M. (1998). Bettors love Skewness, not risk, at the horse track. Journal of Political Economy, 106(1), 205-225.Google Scholar
  17. Graetz, G., Franks, D. (2013). Incorporating human rights into the corporate domain: due diligence, impact assessment and integrated risk management. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 31(2), 97-106.Google Scholar
  18. Graham, J., Weiner, J.B. (1995). Risk versus risk: tradeoffs in protecting health and the environment. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Grasmick, H., Green, D. (1980). Legal punishment, social disapproval and internalization as inhibitors of illegal behavior. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 71(3), 325-335.Google Scholar
  20. Guillaume, B., Charron, S. (1999). Exploring implicit dimensions underlying risk perceptions of waste from mining and milling of uranium ores in France. Fontenay-aux-Roses: Institute for Protection and Nuclear Safety. http://www.irsn.fr/FR/Larecherche/publications-documentation/Publications_documentation/BDD_publi/DSDRE/Documents/IRPA10-P10-176.pdf. Accessed 25 May 2015.
  21. Holzmann, R., Jorgensen, S. (1999). Social protection as social risk management: conceptual underpinnings for social protection strategy paper. SP Discussion Paper 9904. Washington, DC: The World Bank. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/1999/01/437984/social-protection-social-risk-management-conceptual-underpinnings-social-protection-sector-strategy-paper. Accessed 5 July 2015.
  22. Horwitz, F., Anderssen, K., Bezuidenhout, A., et al. (2002). Due diligence neglected: managing human resources and organizational culture in mergers and acquisitions. South African Journal of Business Management, 33(1), 1-10.Google Scholar
  23. Human Rights Council. (2011). Guiding principles on business and human rights: implementing the United Nations’ protect, respect and remedy. Framework. Report of the Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the issue of human rights and transnational corporations and other business enterprises, John Ruggie. A/HRC/17/31. Guiding principles on business and human rights: implementing the United Nations’ protect, respect and remedy. Accessed 24 December 2015.Google Scholar
  24. International Organization for Standardization. (2002). Risk management vocabulary. ISO Guide 73: 2009 - Risk Management Vocabulary. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization. http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail?csnumber=44651. Accessed 24 December 2015.
  25. Jackson, K. (2004). Building reputational capital: strategies for integrity and fair play that improve the bottom line. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Jenkins, C. (1976). Recent evidence supporting psychologic and social risk factors for coronary disease: Part II. The New England Journal of Medicine, 294(19), 1033-1038.Google Scholar
  27. Joyce, S., Thomson, I. (2000). Earning a social licence to operate: social acceptability and resources development in Latin America. The Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin 93(1037). http://oncommonground.ca/wp-content/downloads/license.htm. Accessed 20 May 2014.
  28. Kaplan, S., Garrick, B.J. (1981). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1, 11-27.Google Scholar
  29. Klassen, R., McLaughlin, C. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199-1214.Google Scholar
  30. Koller, G. (2005). Risk assessment and decision making in business and industry: a practical guide. 2nd Ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kytle, B., Ruggie, JG. (2005). Corporate social responsibility as risk management: a model for multinationals. Working Paper No. 10, Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative. Cambridge, Massachusetts: John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University. https://www.hks.harvard.edu/m-rcbg/CSRI/publications/workingpaper_10_kytle_ruggie.pdf. Accessed 24 September 2015.
  32. Lapalme, L. (2003). The social dimension of sustainable development and the mining industry: a background paper. Ottawa: Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Natural Resources Canada, Minerals and Metals Sector.Google Scholar
  33. Lasswell, H. (1936). Politics: who gets what, when, how. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
  34. Macgill, S., Siu, Y. (2004). The nature of risk. Journal of Risk Research, 7(3), 315-352.Google Scholar
  35. Mahmoudi, H., Renn, O., Vanclay, F., et al. (2013). A framework for combining social impact assessment and risk assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 43, 1-8.Google Scholar
  36. Mckinnon, R. (2004). Social risk management and the World Bank: resetting the ‘standards’ for social security? Journal of Risk Research, 7(3), 297-314.Google Scholar
  37. Mendus S. (1995). Human rights in political theory. Political Studies, 43(5), 10-24.Google Scholar
  38. O’Callaghan, T. (2007). Disciplining multinational enterprises: the regulatory power of reputation risk. Global Society, 21(1), 95-117.Google Scholar
  39. Oakeshott, M. (1962). Rationalism in politics and other essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  40. Parkins, J., Haluza-DeLay, R. (2011). Social and ethical considerations of nuclear power development. Staff Paper No. 11-01. Edmonton: Department of Rural Economy, Faculty of Agricultural, Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/103237/2/StaffPaper11-01.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2015.
  41. Perry, J., Herd, T. (2004). Reducing M&A risk through improved due diligence. Strategy and Leadership, 32(2), 12-19.Google Scholar
  42. Porter, M., Kramer, M. (2006). Strategy and society: the link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 78-92.Google Scholar
  43. Renn, O., Burns, W., Kasperson, J., et al. (1992). The social amplification of risk: theoretical foundations and empirical applications. Journal of Social Issues, 48(4), 137-160.Google Scholar
  44. Rio Tinto. (2011). Social risk analysis guidance note. Rio Tinto.Google Scholar
  45. Rosa, E. (1998). Meta-theoretical foundations for post-normal risk. Journal of Risk Research, 1(1), 15-44.Google Scholar
  46. Sandman, P. (1999). Risk = hazard + outrage: coping with controversy about utility risks. Engineering News-Record, 4, A19-A23. http://www.psandman.com/articles/amsa.htm. Accessed 31 July 2015.
  47. Sapolsky, H. (1990). The Politics of Risk. Daedalus, 119(4), 83-96.Google Scholar
  48. Schafrik, S., Kazakidis, K. (2011). Due diligence in mine feasibility studies for the assessment of social risk. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment, 25(1), 86-101.Google Scholar
  49. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280-285.Google Scholar
  50. Slovic, P., Fischhoff, B., Lichtenstein, S. (1984). Behavioral decision theory on risk and safety. Acta Psychologia, 56(1-3), 183-203.Google Scholar
  51. Sugiishi, M., Takatsu, F. (1993). Cigarette smoking is a major risk factor for coronary spasm. Circulation, 87, 76-79.Google Scholar
  52. Titchener, K., Wong, I. (2010). Driver distractions: characteristics underlying drivers’ risk perceptions. Journal of Risk Research, 13(6), 771-780.Google Scholar
  53. Vanclay, F. (2002). Conceptualising social impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 22(3), 183-211.Google Scholar
  54. Warhurst, A. (2001). Corporate citizenship and corporate social investment: drivers of tri-sector partnerships. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 1(1), 57-73.Google Scholar
  55. Wathern, P. (2004). An introductory guide to EIA. In P. Wathern (Ed.), Environmental impact assessment: theory and practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  56. Yim, M., Vaganov, P. (2003). Effects of education on nuclear risk perception and attitude: theory. Progress in Nuclear Energy, 42(2), 221-235.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for International Risk, School of Communication, International Studies and LanguagesThe University of South AustraliaAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Stones for DevelopmentUnited Nations Development ProgrammeBruxellesBelgium

Personalised recommendations