Skip to main content

Identifying Gaps and Opportunities for Research on Urban and Regional Resilience—Highlighting the Advantages of Research Cooperation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Towards the Implementation of the New Urban Agenda

Abstract

Resilience in urban and regional planning means preparing for the unforeseen, being able to withstand disturbance, dealing with risks in a coordinated way and recovering from destruction and decline. This requires the development of flexible, adaptive and resistant city structures (social, physical and institutional) that can both reactively and proactively adjust or transform to changing conditions. Influential nodes of international discussion on resilience have evolved, with strong guidance provided by a group of research centers and universities which dedicate much of their work to the topic of resilience. However, thus far the city-region discussion has been dominated by research on the effects of natural events (mainly ‘disasters’), and climate change (as a slow burn) (Schiappacasse and Müller 2016). One of the challenges facing city planning researchers and practitioners is to build urban resilience. This can best be achieved by focusing on common research interests and promoting academic cooperation in various contexts and frameworks. The article focuses on answering the following two questions: (a) What do we know about resilience? This section includes a discussion on the conceptual understanding of resilience and the major areas of investigation. (b) Which research topics on resilience could become common research interests? This section of the article focuses on potential topics for joint research and academic cooperation between Japan and Germany.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    R.A is a multidisciplinary international research consortium exploring the dynamics of social-ecological systems.

  2. 2.

    The workshops involved individuals who would become members of the Resilience Network (later Resilience Alliance) and of international coalitions focused on resilience research (Folke 2006; Parker and Hackett 2012).

  3. 3.

    One main result of the Second World Conference on Disaster Reduction was the adoption of the Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA). The HFA is the first comprehensive plan detailing the work required of different sectors and actors to mitigate the impact of disasters by building resilience (United Nation 2007).

  4. 4.

    The International Conference on Building Resilience (lead by the Salford Centre for Education and Built Environment); and Resilience 2008 (organized by the Stockholm Resilience Centre in collaboration with the International Commission on Climate Change and Development).

  5. 5.

    2nd International Conference on Urban Sustainability and Resilience, London; 4th Conference on Building Resilience, Salford; 3rd Annual Meeting of the ANDROID Disaster Resilience Network, Salford; 5th Global Forum on Urban Resilience and Adaptation, Bonn; 5th Conference on Community Resiliency, Arlington; Resilience 2014: Resilient and Development: Mobilizing for Transformation, Montpellier; IFRI Conference: Building Resilience for Food and Nutrition, Addis Ababa; Coastal Resilience Conference, Galveston; Regional Studies Association European Conference: Diverse regions building resilient communities and territories, Izmir; DLGS Conference: Resilience in Urban and Regional Development: from concept to implementation, Berlin; Urban Regions under Change: towards social and ecological resilience, Hamburg.

  6. 6.

    The adaptive cycle (Holling 1986) describes how an ecosystem self-organizes and responds to a changing world. It consists of four phases: rapid growth (exploitation, r phase), conservation (K phase), release (creative destruction, Ω phase) and reorganization (renewal, α phase).

  7. 7.

    See Footnote 6.

  8. 8.

    Interview with Akihiro Ohta, Minister of Land, Infrastructure and Tourism, Japan. In PwC (2013) Rebuilding for resilience. Fortifying infrastructure to withstand disaster. Lessons from Japan: Setting the standards of resiliency.

References

  • Adger, W. N. (2000). Social and ecological resilience: Are they related? Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, D. E. (2013). Resilience and disaster risk reduction: An etymological journey. Natural Hazards System Sciences, 13, 2007–2716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderies, J. M., Walker., B. H., & Kinzig, A. P. (2006). Fifteen weddings and a funeral: case studies and resilience-based management. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahadur, A. V., Ibrahi, M., & Tanner, T. (2010). The resilience renaissance? Unpacking of resilience for tackling climate change and disasters. Strengthening Climate Resilience Discussion Paper 1. Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex Folke et al., 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M. H., & Garmestani, A. S. (2011). Embracing panarchy, building resilience and integrate adaptive management through a rebirth of the National Environmental Policy Act. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(5), 1420–1427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann, J. (2008). Globaler Umweltwandel, Naturgefahren, Vulnerabilität und Katastrophenresilienz. Notwendigkeit der Perspektivenerweiterung in der Raumplanung. Raumforschung und Raumordnung, 66(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brand, F. S., & Jax, K. (2007). Focusing the meaning(s) of resilience: resilience as a descriptive concept and a boundary object. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Marti Anderies, J., & Abel, N. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what. Ecosystems, 4, 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, K. (2006). Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Challenge, 16, 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke, C., Carpenter, S. R., Walker, B., Scheffer, M., Chapin, T., & J. Rockström. (2010). Resilience thinking: integrating resilience, adaptability and transformability. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, K. (2006). A case study approach to understanding regional resilience. Institute of Urban and regional Development. Berkeley. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/8tt02163.

  • Frazier, T. G., Wood, N., & Yamal, B. (2010). Stakeholder perspectives on land use strategies for adapting to climate-change—Enhanced coastal hazards: Sarasota, Florida. Applied Geography, 30(4), 506–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • FSIN (Food Security Information Network). (2014). Resilience measurement principles. Towards an Agenda for Measurement Design. Technical Series No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldschalk, D. R. (2003). Urban hazard mitigation: creating resilient cities. Natural Hazards Review, 4(3), 136–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiving, S., & Fleischhauer, M. (2009). Klimawandelgerecht Stadtentwicklung: Rolle der bestehenden städtbaulichen Leitbilder und Instrumente. BBSR online publication, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H. (2000). Ecological resilience—In theory and application. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematic, 38, 425–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, L. H., & Folke, C. (2005). Resilience-now more than ever. Ecology and Society, 10(2), 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1978). Adaptive environmental assessment and management. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1986). The resilience of terrestrial ecosystems; local surprise and global change. In W. C. Clark & R. E. Munn (Eds.), Sustainable development of the biosphere (pp. 292–317). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling, C. S. (1996). Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In P. Schulze (Ed.), Engineering within ecological constraints (pp. 31–44). Washington, USA: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japanese Cabinet Secretariat. (2013). Building national resilience. Creating a strong and flexible country. National Resilience Promotion Office, Cabinet Secretariat. http://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/kokudo_kyoujinka/en/e01_panf.pdf.

  • Keck, M., & Sakdapolrak, P. (2013). What is social resilience? Lessons learn and ways forward. Erkunde, 67(1), 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebel, L., Anderies, J. M., Cambell, B., Folke, C., Hatfield-Dodds, S., Hughes, T. P., et al. (2006). Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, B., & Hagan, P. (2007). Disasters and communities: Understanding social resilience. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 22, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maki, N. (2013). How resilient is Japan? Response and recovery lessons from 1995 and the 2011 Tohoku disasters. In Interdisciplinary conversations about the 2011 Disasters including the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident. https://fukushimaforum.wordpress.com/workshops/sts-forum-on-the-2011-fukushima-east-japan-disaster/manuscripts/session-1/how-resilient-is-japan-response-and-recovery-lessons-from-the-1995-kobe-and-the-2011-tohoku-disasters/.

  • Manyena, S. B. (2006). The concept of resilience revisited. Disasters, 30(4), 433–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manyena, S. B., Mavhura, E., Muzenda, C., & Mabaso, E. (2013). Disaster risk reduction legislation: is there a move from event to processes? Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1786–1794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, B. (Ed.). (2010). Urban and regional resilience. How do cities and regions deal with change? German Annual of Spatial Research and Policy 2010. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Resilience Promotion Headquarters. (2014). Action Plan for National Resilience 2014. http://www.cas.go.jp/jp/seisaku/kokudo_kyoujinka/en/action_plan.html.

  • Nelson, D. R., Adger, W. N., & Brown, K. (2007). Adaptation to environmental change: Contributions of a resilience Framework. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 395–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, K. A., & Durham, W. H. (2012). Farm-scale adaptation and vulnerability to environmental stresses: Insights from winegrowing in Northern California. Global Environmental Change, 22(2), 483–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J. N., & Hackett, E. J. (2012). Hot spots and hot moments in scientific collaboration and social movements. American Sociological Review, 77(1), 21–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers). (2013). Rebuilding for resilience. Fortifying infrastructure to withstand disaster. Lessons from Japan: Setting the standards of resiliency. https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/psrc/publications/assets/pwc-rebuilding-for-resilience-fortifying-infrastructure-to-withstand-disaster.pdf.

  • Pickett, S., Cardenasso, M., & Grove, J. M. (2004). Resilient cities: Meanings, models, and metaphor for integrating the ecological, socio-economics and planning realm. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69, 369–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resilience Alliance. (2010). Assessing resilience in social-ecological systems: Workbook for practitioners. Revised Version 2.0.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. (2010). Prioritizing climate change adaptation and local level resilience in Durban, South Africa. Environment and Urbanization, 22, 397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schiappacasse, P. (2014). Urban and regional resilience: A review of scientific contributions in environmental sciences (2000–2013). Internal Report. Chair for Spatial Development, Technische Universität Dresden. https://tu-dresden.de/die_tu_dresden/fakultaeten/fakultaet_forst_geo_und_hydrowissenschaften/fachrichtung_geowissenschaften/raumentwicklung/forschung_a/dokumente/resiliencereport2014.

  • Schiappacasse, P., & Müller, B. (2016). One fits all? Resilience as a multipurpose concept in regional and environmental management (in Journal revision).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeliger, L., & Turok, I. (2013). Towards sustainable cities; extending resilience with insights from vulnerability and transition theory. Sustainability, 5, 2108–2128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takewaki, I., Moustafa, A., & Fujita, K. (2013). Improving the earthquake resilience of buildings: the worst case approach. Springer Series in Reliability Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2007). Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015: Building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. Extract from the final report of the International Strategy for Disaster Reduction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vale, L. J., & Campanella, T. (2005). The resilient city: How modern cities recover from disaster. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. H., & Meyers, J. A. (2004). Thresholds in ecological and social-ecological system: A developing database. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. H., & Salt, D. (2006). Resilience thinking: Sustaining ecosystems and people in a changing world. Washington: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G. S., Janssen, M., et al. (2002). Resilience management in social-ecological systems: A working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Ecology and Society, 6(1), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, B. H., Holling, C. S., Carpenter, S., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability, and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, I., & O’Hare, P. (2014). From rhetoric to reality: Which resilience, why resilience, and whose resilience in spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32, 934–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerer, K. S. (1994). Human geography and the ‘new ecology’: The prospect and promise of integration. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84(1), 108–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulina Schiappacasse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Schiappacasse, P., Müller, B. (2018). Identifying Gaps and Opportunities for Research on Urban and Regional Resilience—Highlighting the Advantages of Research Cooperation. In: Müller, B., Shimizu, H. (eds) Towards the Implementation of the New Urban Agenda. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61376-5_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics