Abstract
A regular follow-up on patients is one of the fundamental and crucial parts of the medical care system. The value and the need for such a strict follow-up system are very well illustrated in the management plan of hydrocephalus (HC) patients. The sequelae and related and unrelated complications of such patient are innumerous. Hydrocephalus is not the problem of dilated ventricles only; it is a problem of the whole brain, what can be called the hydrocephalus brain! Therefore, the proper management of hydrocephalus should extend to all aspects of a hydrocephalus brain. The problems of the hydrocephalus may start intrauterine but continues lifelong. Therefore, the neurosurgical treating team is obliged to provide a long-term follow-up plan for each case according to the genetic profile, age, etiology of hydrocephalus, pathophysiology, method of treatment, and associated anomalies. Although the general belief in the principle of treatment of hydrocephalus seems straightforward (reduce pressure, optimize brain function and well-being of the patient), a long-term management can lead to some challenging brainteasers over time. In fact, sometimes, complications such as overdrainage or turning the patient to be shunt dependent may occur after insertion of the shunt or ETV performance.
We recommend following up these patients in a multidisciplinary hydrocephalus and spina bifida outpatient clinic that can provide a comprehensive care from every different angles such as pediatric neurosurgery, pediatric neurology, psychology, orthopedic, urology, physiotherapy, rehabilitation, and social services all in one visit. The schedule and frequency of the follow-up visits may differ from center to center. We recommend that the first visit should be within 2 weeks from discharge and the second after 2–3 months. The long-term monitoring plan should be designed according to the needs and character of each case. Shunt-dependent patients should be scheduled for shunt revision before shunt malfunction appears. It is usually scheduled according to the rate of the growth of the child, which differs from one child to another (Colak et al., Pediatr Neurosurg 27:208–10, 1997; Lumenta and Skotarczak, Childs Nerv Syst 11:173–5, 1995; Rekate, Semin Pediatr Neurol 16:9–15, 2009; Sufianov et al., J Neurosurg Pediatr 5:392–401, 2010; Swain et al. J Neuropsychol 3:229–44, 2009; Takahashi, Childs Nerv Syst 22:1591–602, 2006; Vinchon et al., Fluids Barriers CNS 9:18, 2012; Yadav et al., BMC Res Notes 2:137, 2009).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Colak A, Albright AL, Pollack IF. Follow-up of children with shunted hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1997;27(4):208–10.
Lumenta CB, Skotarczak U. Long-term follow-up in 233 patients with congenital hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst. 1995;11(3):173–5.
Sufianov AA, Sufianova GZ, Iakimov IA. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in patients younger than 2 years: outcome analysis of 41 hydrocephalus cases. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010;5(4):392–401.
Lucic MA, Koprivsek K, Kozic D, Spero M, Spirovski M, Lucic S. Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of endoscopic third ventriculostomy patency with differently acquired fast imaging with steady-state precession sequences. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2014;14(3):165–70.
St George E, Natarajan K, Sgouros S. Changes in ventricular volume in hydrocephalic children following successful endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Childs Nerv Syst. 2004;20(11–12):834–8.
Cinalli G, Spennato P, Ruggiero C, Aliberti F, Zerah M, Trischitta V, Cianciulli E, Maggi G. Intracranial pressure monitoring and lumbar puncture after endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(1):126–36.
Czosnyka M, Pickard JD. Monitoring and interpretation of intracranial pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(6):813–21.
Hommet C, Billard C, Gillet P, Barthez MA, Lourmiere JM, Santini JJ, de Toffol B, Corcia P, Autret A. Neuropsychologic and adaptive functioning in adolescents and young adults shunted for congenital hydrocephalus. J Child Neurol. 1999;14(3):144–50.
Iddon JL, Morgan DJ, Ahmed R, Loveday C, Sahakian BJ, Pickard JD. Memory and learning in young adults with hydrocephalus and spina bifida: specific cognitive profiles. Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2003;13(Suppl 1):S32–5.
Lacy M, Pyykkonen BA, Hunter SJ, Do T, Oliveira M, Austria E, Mottlow D, Larson E, Frim D. Intellectual functioning in children with early shunted posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2008;44(5):376–81.
Larysz P, Larysz D, Mandera M. Radiological findings in relation to the neurodevelopmental outcome in hydrocephalic children treated with shunt insertion or endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Childs Nerv Syst. 2014;30(1):99–104.
Pelegrín Valero C, Tirapu Ustarroz J, Landa González N. Neuropsychological deficits in hydrocephalus associated spina bifida. Rev Neurol. 2001;32(5):489–97.
Ammar A, Sultan A, Mulhim F, Yousef A. Empty Sella syndrome does it exist in children? J Neurosurg. 1999;91:960–3.
Anderson EM. Cognitive deficits in children with spina bifida and hydrocephalus: a review of the literature. Br J Educ Psychol. 1973;43(3):257–68.
Ammar A, Ibrahim AWI, Nasser M, Rashid M. CSF hydrocele unusual complication of V-P shunt. Neurosurg Rev. 1991;14:141–3.
Ammar A, Nasser M. Longterm complications of buried valves. Neurosurg Rev. 1995;18:65–7.
Ammar A, Nasser M. Intraventricular migration of VP shunts. Neurosurg Rev. 1995;18:293–5.
Ammar A. Nasser M. Anaizi A. Farag M. Management of VP shunt complications. Proceeding of the 13th World Congress of Neurosurgical Surgeons, F6 19R038.507-516, 2005 June 19–24, Marrakesh, Morocco.
Hadzikarik N, Nasser M, Mashani A, Ammar A. CSF hydrothorax- VP shunt complication without displacement of a peritoneal catheter. Childs Nerv Syst. 2002;8:179–18.
Iglesias S, Ros B, Martín Á, Carrasco A, Segura M, Delgado A, Rius F, Arráez MÁ. Surgical outcome of the shunt: 15-year experience in a single institution. Childs Nerv Syst. 2016;32(12):2377–85.
Kemp J, Flannery AM, Tamber MS, Duhaime AC, Pediatric Hydrocephalus Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines Task Force. Pediatric hydrocephalus: systematic literature review and evidence-based guidelines. Part 9: effect of ventricular catheter entry point and position. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;14(Suppl 1):72–6.
Baird LC, Mazzola CA, Auguste KI, Klimo P Jr, Flannery AM, Pediatric Hydrocephalus Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines Task Force. Pediatric hydrocephalus: systematic literature review and evidence-based guidelines. Part 5: effect of valve type on cerebrospinal fluid shunt efficacy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;14(Suppl 1):35–43.
Limbrick DD Jr, Baird LC, Klimo P Jr, Riva-Cambrin J, Flannery AM, Pediatric Hydrocephalus Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines Task Force. Pediatric hydrocephalus: systematic literature review and evidence-based guidelines. Part 4: cerebrospinal fluid shunt or endoscopic third ventriculostomy for the treatment of hydrocephalus in children. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2014;14(Suppl 1):30–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tan, TC., Ammar, A. (2017). Follow-Up Strategies for Hydrocephalus Patients. In: Ammar, A. (eds) Hydrocephalus. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61304-8_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61304-8_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61303-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61304-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)