Skip to main content

Dynamics of Legal Changes in Polish Cadastre

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Dynamics in GIscience (GIS OSTRAVA 2017)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography ((LNGC))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In more developed countries, contemporary cadastral system design is premised on the need for credibility, accuracy, timeliness, flexibility, completeness, and availability. Cadastral Systems as the official land information systems for the entire country operate on the basis of clearly defined principles contained in the legislation. Any need to modernize the system require changes in legislation. This paper focuses specifically on cadastral system flexibility, which stems directly from the dynamics of law. The method used to develop the approach is based upon dynamics of legal changes in the context of the international development concepts. The approach is then applied to the Polish cadastral system. It is found that a measure of real estate cadastre legal flexibility is it’s ability to react to dynamic, changing rules and situation. Globally, this means that the proposed approach can be adopted to determine cadastral flexibility in terms of its legal framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Buśko M, & Meusz A. (2014). Current status of real estate cadastre in Poland with reference to historical conditions of different regions of the country. 9th International Conference on Environmental Engineering (ICEE), Vilnius, Lithuania, 22–23 May 2014. doi:10.3846/enviro.2014.196, eISSN 2029-7092, eISBN 978-609-457-640-9. http://leidykla.vgtu.lt/conferences/ENVIRO_2014/Abstracts/5/196.html

  • Bydłosz, J. (2015). The application of the land administration domain model in building a country profile for the Polish cadastre. Land Use Policy, 49, 598–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, P., & McLaughlin, J. (1999). Land administration. New York: Oxford University Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawidowicz A., & Źrobek R. (2014). Analysis of concepts of cadastral system technological development. Procedia Engineering. eISSN2029-7092, eISBN978-609-457-640-9. doi:10.3846/enviro.2014.201, http://leidykla.vgtu.lt/conferences/ENVIRO_2014/Articles/5/201_Dawidowicz.pdf

  • Dawidowicz, A., & Źrobek, R. (2012a). Determination of the reference cadastral system benchmarks in the light of current research. Journal of the Polish Real Estate Scientific Society, 20(4), 5–17. http://www.tnn.org.pl/tnn/publik/20/TNN_tom_XX_4.pdf

  • Dawidowicz, A., & Źrobek, R. (2012b). The evolving role of the cadastre in the land administration system in Poland, FIG/FAO International Seminar State Land Management in Transitional Countries: Issues and Ways Forward, Budapest, Hungary, Ministry of Rural Development, 20–21 September 2012 pp. 1-13, Free access 30.06.2015 http://www.fig.net/resources/proceedings/2012/Hungary_2012_comm7/3.3_paper_dawidowcz_et_al.pdf

  • De Vries, W. T. (2016). Post disaster consolidation of land, memory and identity. International Federation of Surveyors, Article of the Month, May 2016, pp. 1–12, http://fig.net/resources/monthly_articles/2016/may_2016/de_vries_may_2016.pdf

  • Enemark, S., Williamson, I., & Wallace, J. (2005). Building modern land administration systems developed economies, pending publication. Journal of Spatial Science, 50(2), 51–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enemark, S. (2010a). From cadastre to land governance: The role of land professionals and FIG, Annual World Bank Conference on Land Policy and Administration, April 26–27, 2010, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enemark, S. (2010b). The evolving role of cadastral systems in support of good land governance, open symposium FIG 7 commission, September 2010. Karlovy Vary: Czech Republic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enemark, S., Bell, K. C., Lemmen, Ch., & McLaren, R. (2014). Fit-for-purpose land administration. International Federation of Surveyors (FIG) (pp. 44). Frederiksberg, Denmark: Jensen Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • FIG. (1995). FIG statement on the cadastre, FIG publication No. 11, FIG Office, Copenhagen. http://www.fig.net/commission7/reports/cadastre/statement_on_cadastre.html (5.12.2010).

  • FIG. (1998). Cadastre 2014. A vision for a future cadastral system. FIG publication No 15, http://www.fig.net/cadastre2014/translation/c2014-english.pdf (22.02.2013).

  • FIG. (1999). Bathurst declaration. http://www.fig.net/pub/figpub/pub21/figpub21.htm (5.12.2010).

  • FIG. (2002). Reforming the cadastre. In Kaufmann J., Steudler D. 2002. Benchmarking Cadastral Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • FIG. (2010). The social tenure domain model. A pro-poor land tool. Edited by Lemmen Ch. 2010. FIG publication No. 52, p. 21, http://www.fig.net/pub/figpub/pub52/figpub52.pdf (30.01.2015).

  • FIG. (2014). Cadastre 2014 and beyond. FIG publication No 61, p. 84, http://www.fig.net/pub/figpub/pub61/Figpub61.pdf (16.06.2014).

  • Gaździcki, J. (1995). Systemy katastralne (p. 184). Warszawa: PPWK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Governatori, G., & Rotolo, A. (2015). Logics for legal dynamics. In logic in the theory and practice of lawmaking (pp. 323–356). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19575-9_12

  • Henssen, J. (1995). Basic principles of the main cadastral systems in the world. In Proceedings of the One Day Seminar held during the Annual Meeting of Commission 7, Cadastre and Rural Land Management, of the International Federation of Surveyors (FIG), May 16, Delft, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • INSPIRE Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantari, M., Rajabifard, A., & Bennett, R. (2010). Modern land administration; technical characteristics. FIG Congress 2010. Facing the Challenges—Building the Capacity. April 11–16, 2010, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, J., & Kaul, Ch. (2004). Assessment of the Core Cadastral Domain Model from a Cadastre 2014 Point of View. In Proceedings of the workshop standardization in the cadastral domain, Bamberg, Germany, 9–10 December 2004, FIG, Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, J. (2012). Towards cadastre 2034. Proceedings International FIG Symposium & Commission 7 Annual Meeting, Innsbruck, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krelle, A., & Rajabifard, A. (2010). Cadastre 2014: New challenges and direction. FIG Congress 2010. Facing the Challenges—Building the Capacity. April 11–16, 2010, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laarakker, P. (2008). EuroGeographics’ vision on cadastre and land registration in Europe 2012, FIG working week 2008, Integrating Generations, Stockholm, Sweden, June 14–19, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Land, N. (2011). Cadastre 2.0—Next generation of cadastre. Presentation on 3rd Cadastral Congress. November 23–25, 2011, Warsaw, Poland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmen, CH., Oosterom van, P., Zevenbergen, J., Quak, W., & Molen van der, P. (2003). Further progress in the development of the core cadastral domain model. FIG Working Week, Paris, France, April 13–17, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmen, CH., & Oosterom van P. (2006). Version 1.0 of the FIG core cadastral domain model. XXIII FIG Congress. Munich, Germany, October 8–13, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemmen, CH., & Oosterom van, P. (2013). The land administration domain model standard. 5th Land Administration Domain Model Workshop, September 24–25, 2013, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, p. 20, http://www.fig.net/news/news_2013/ladm2013/01.pdf (30.01.2015).

  • Mills, A. (2008). The Dimension of Public Policy in Private International Law. 4 J. Priv. Int’l L. 201–236, 336; Chapter 3.2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D., & Zevenbergen, J. A. (2011). Toward land administration systems to support climate change mitigation payments. Land Tenure Journal: Open Access, 2, 57–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molen van der, P. (2003). The future cadastres—Cadastres after 2014. Proceedings of FIG Working Week and 125th Anniversary of FIG, Paris, France, April 13–17, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • PWN. (http://sjp.pwn.pl/sjp/elastyczny;2556392 access 22.09.2014).

  • Shrestha, R., Tuladhar, A., & Zevenbergen, J. (2016). Exploring land governance in post-disaster: A case of informal settlement. International Federation of Surveyors. Article of the month—January 2016. pp. 1–16. http://fig.net/resources/monthly_articles/2016/january_2016/shrestha_etal_january_2016.pdf

  • Sobota, K. (1991). System and flexibility in law. Argumentation (Vol. 5, pp. 275–282). Berlin: Kluwer Academic Publishers (Printed in the Netherlands).

    Google Scholar 

  • Steudler, D., Williamson, I.P., Rajabifard, A., & Enemark, S. (2004). The Cadastral Template Project. FIG Working Week “Good Practices in Land Administration and Cadastre”, Athens, Greece, May 22–27, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoter, J., Oosterom, P., Ploeger, H., & Aalders, H. (2004). Conceptual 3D Cadastral Model Applied in Several Countries. FIG Working Week 2004, Athens, Greece. May 22–27, 2004, p. 27. http://fig.net/pub/athens/papers/ts25/TS25_1_Stoter_et_al.pdf (30.12.2015).

  • UN. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. UE Sustainable Development Agenda, Resolution A/RES/70/1, pp. 35. http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E (1.07.2016).

  • UN-ECE. (1996). Land administration guidelines, UNECE, Geneva. http://www.unece.org/env/hs/wpla/docs/guidelines/lag.html (08.04.2014).

  • UN/FIG. (1996). The bogor declaration. United Nations Interregional Meeting of Experts on the Cadastre, Bogor Indonesia, March 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-ECE. (2005a). Guidelines on real property units and identifiers. Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-ECE. (2005b). Land administration in the UNECE Region. Development trends and main principles, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, I. P., Enemark, S., Wallace, J., & Rajabifard, A. (2010). Land administration for sustainable development (p. 497). Redlands, California: ESRI Press Academic. ISBN 978–1-58948-041-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, L. Ch. (2011). Law and flexibility—Rule of law limits of a rhetorical silver bullet. The Journal Jurisprudence. J. Juris, 549–567.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Agnieszka Dawidowicz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dawidowicz, A., Klimach, A., Źróbek , R. (2018). Dynamics of Legal Changes in Polish Cadastre. In: Ivan, I., Horák, J., Inspektor, T. (eds) Dynamics in GIscience. GIS OSTRAVA 2017. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61297-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics