Skip to main content

Simulation-Based Enterprise Management

Model Driven from Business Process to Simulation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications ((SFMA))

Abstract

Industrial enterprises are gradually integrating Modeling & Simulation (M&S) approaches to support their management processes and to keep themselves competitive in the market by handling and connecting more efficiently their key information. On the one hand, several modeling solutions exist, with different views or abstraction levels, which are not always compatible; on the other hand, the usage of simulation for enterprise management should be aligned with the nature of decision-making. This hinders the choice of an adapted M&S solution. To facilitate the resolution of this issue, this chapter mainly proposes to apply Model Driven Service Engineering Architecture (MDSEA) , which guides the usage of M&S for enterprise management at business/technical levels or with static/dynamic points of view. In its first part, the chapter focuses on different state-of-the-art elements (e.g., Enterprise Modeling, Discrete Event Simulation, etc.) which support the development of a simulation-aided decision making cycle for enterprise management. Simulation models involved in this cycle can be gradually created from transformation of high-level or static models. An example of such transformation is described in the second part of this chapter. The objective is to move from BPMN 2.0 (Business Process Model and Notation) to DEVS (Discrete EVent Specification) which is a simulation-ready language. The second part ends by presenting a use-case and the implemented open-source software, called Service Lifecycle Management Tool Box (SLMToolBox). The chapter is concluded by discussing the propositions and the perspectives, particularly simulation of decision models for enterprise management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Al-Ahmari, A. M. A., & Ridgway, K. (1999). An integrated modeling method to support manufacturing systems analysis and design. Computers in Industry, 38(3), pp. 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-3615(98)00094-3

  • Álvares-Ribeiro, N., Martins, ÂA., & Pinto Ferreira, J. J. (2004). Introducing Time Horizons to Enterprise Networking Architecture. In Virtual Enterprises and Collaborative Networks (pp. 63–70). Boston: Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-8139-1_7

  • Anglani A., Grieco A., Pacella M., Tolio T. (2002), Object-oriented modeling and simulation of flexible manufacturing systems: a rule-based procedure, Simulation Modeling Practice and Theory, Vol. 10, No. 3–4, pp. 209–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • ATL (2013), ATL/User Guide—The ATL Language http://wiki.eclipse.org/ATL/ (accessed November 2013).

  • Bazoun, H., Zacharewicz. G., Ducq. Y., Boye, H. (2013), Transformation of Extended Actigram Star to BPMN 2.0 and Simulation Model in the frame of Model Driven Service Engineering Architecture. TMS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazoun, H., Zacharewicz. G., Ducq. Y., Boye, H. (2014), SLMToolBox: An implementation of MDSEA for Servitisation and Enterprise Interoperability. In I-ESA, 7th international conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkamouna, N., ElMaraghy, W., Huyet, A.-L. & Kouiss, K., (2014). Architecture Framework for Manufacturing System Design. s.l., s.n., pp. 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouquet, P. et al. (2005), D2.2.1. Specification of a common framework for characterizing alignment, KWEB EU-IST-2004-507482 Project, v2.0., 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourey, J.P., Grangel Seguer, R. and Doumeingts G., Berre, A.J. (2007) ‘Report on Model Driven Interoperability’, Delivrable DTG2.3, INTEROP Network of Excellence, pp. 91, http://interop-vlab.eu/deliv/tg2-model-driven-interoperability/, Avril.

  • Boyé, H., Bazoun, H., Belkhelladi, K. (2014), SLMToolBox: ATool Set For Service Engineering, Paper accepted in MODELSWARD 2014 2nd international conf on Model-Driven Engineering and Software Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruzzone A.G., Mosca R., Revetria R., Rapallo S., (2000), Risk analysis in harbor environments using Simulation, Safety Science, Vol. 35, pp. 75–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlton, R.T. (2001), Business Process Management: Profiting From Process. Sams publishing, Indianapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrie, A. S., & Macintosh, R. (1997). An assessment of GRAI Grids and their use in the Strathclyde Integration Method. Production Planning & Control, 8(2), pp. 106–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, J., Pedrinaci, C., Leidig, T., Rupino, P., De Leenheer P. (2012), Open semantic service net-works. The international Symposium on Service Science (ISSS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Çetinkaya, D., Verbraeck, A., Seck, M. D. (2012), Model Transformation from BPMN to DEVS in the MDD4MS Framework”, TMS-DEVS, pp. 304–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D., Doumeingts, G. & Vernadat, F., Architectures for enterprise integration and interoperability: Computers in Industry, p. (59), pp. 647–659. 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, D. and Doumeingts, G., (1996), The GRAI-GIM reference model, architecture and methodology, in “Architectures for Enterprise Integration”, Bernus P., Nemes L., J. Williams T. (Ed), IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen K. Y., Lu S. S., (1997), A petri-net and entity-relationship diagram based object-oriented design method for manufacturing systems control”, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 10, Nos. 1–4, pp. 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarnecki K. and Helsen S., (2003), Classification of Model Transformation Approaches, in OOPSLA’03 Workshop on Generative Techniques in the Context of Model-Driven Architecture, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Ambrogio, A. and Zacharewicz, G. 2016. Resource-based modeling and simulation of business processes. In Proceedings of the Summer Computer Simulation Conference (SCSC ’16). Society for Computer Simulation International, San Diego, CA, USA, Article 63, 8 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doumeingts, G. (1984), La méthode GRAI [Ph.D. thesis], Bordeaux, France, University of Bordeaux 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doumeingts, G., Vallespir, B., Chen, D. (1998), “Decisional modeling GRAI Grid” in International handbook on information systems, Bernus, P., Mertins, K. & Schmidt, G. ed., Berlin, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doumeingts, G. & Ducq, Y., (2001). Enterprise Modeling techniques to improve efficiency of enterprises” in. International Journal of Production Planning and Control, 12(2), pp. 146–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducq, Y., & Vallespir, B. (2005), Performance evaluation using decisional modeling. In 4th international conference on decision (pp. 15–30).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducq, Y. et al. (2014), “Generic Methodology for Service Engineering based on Service Modeling and Model Transformation State of the art in model driven approaches and model transformation” in “MSEE book: Manufacturing Service Ecosystem: Achievements of the European 7th Framework Programme”, FoF-ICT Project MSEE: Manufacturing SErvice Ecosystem (Grant No. 284860), Aachen: Verlag-Mainz: Bremer Schriften zur integrierten Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung, pp. 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • ElMaraghy, W., ElMaraghy, H., Tomiyama, T. & Monostori, L., (2012). Complexity in engineering design and manufacturing. CIRP Annals— Manufacturing Technology, Volume 61, p. 793–814.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garredu, S., Vittori, E., Santucci, J-F., Bisgambiglia, P-A. (2012), A Meta-Model for DEVS Designed following Model Driven Engineering specifications, SIMULTECH, page 152–157. SciTePress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goepp-Thiebaud, V., & Kiefer, F. (2008). Multi-screen view and GRAI GridS to model decisional process of manufacturing IS alignment. IFAC Proceedings Volumes (IFAC-Papers Online), 17(1 PART 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamri, M. and Zacharewicz, G. (2012), Automatic generation of object-oriented code from DEVS graphical specifications. In WSC’12. Article 409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaakkola, H. & Thalheim, B., (2011). Architecture-driven modeling methodologies. s.l., IOS Press, p. 98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahangirian M., Eldabi T., Naseer A., Stergioulas L. K, Young T., (2010), Simulation in manufacturing and business: A review, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 203, pp. 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeill K. (2010), “How to extend the Eclipse Ecore metamodel.” http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/ library/os-eclipse-emfmetamodel/index.html

  • Kettinger W. J., Teng J. T. C., Guha S.,(1997), Business process change: a study of methodologies, techniques, and tools, MIS Quarterly, 1997, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 55–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtev I., van den Berg K., (2005), MISTRAL: A language for model transformations in the MOF meta-modeling architecture, Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3599, pp. 139–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Moigne, J. -L. (1977), La théorie du système général. Théorie de la modélisation, University Press of France, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lezoche, M., Panetto, H. & Aubry, A., (2011), Conceptualisation approach for cooperative information systems interoperability, in 13th International Conference on Enterprise, Information Systems, ICEIS 2011, pp. 101–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Y. (2012), Approach for Information Systems Semantic Interoperability in Supply Chain Environment, Ph.D. Thesis, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesarovic, M. D., Masko, D. and Takahara, Y., (1970), Theory of Hierarchical Multilevel Systems, New York and London, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller J. and Mukerji, J. (June, 2003). “MDA Guide Version 1.0.1”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, S., and Risco Martin, J. L. (2012). Netcentric System of Systems Engineering with DEVS Unified Process. 610–613. CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MSEE book. (2014). “Manufacturing Service Ecosystem, Achievements of the European 7th Framework Programme FoF-ICT Project”, Stefan Wiesner, Guglielmina C., Gusmeroli S., Doumeingts G. (Ed), Aachen: Mainz: Bremer Schriften zur integrierten Produkt- und Prozessentwicklung.

    Google Scholar 

  • MSEE D15.2, (2012) deliverable “D15.2 D15.1 Methodologies and Tools for SLM components development M9 issue”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nethe A., Stahlmann H. D. (1999). “Survey of a general theory of process modeling”, Proceedings of the International Conference on Process Modeling, Cottbus, Germany, pp. 2–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noran, O. (2012). Building a support framework for enterprise integration. Computers in Industry, 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2012.09.006

  • OMG, “Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) version 2.0” doc num: formal/2011-01-03.

    Google Scholar 

  • OMG, “MDA Guide Version 1.0.” document number: omg/2003-05-01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirayesh-Neghab, A., Siadat A., Tavakkoli-Moghadam R., Jolai, F. (Sep. 2011). An integrated approach for risk-assessment analysis in a manufacturing process using FMEA and DES , ICQR 2011 IEEE International Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirayesh-Neghab, A., Etienne, A., Kleiner, M., Roucoules, L.(Sep. 2015). “Performance evaluation of collaboration in the design process: Using interoperability measurement”, Computers in Industry. Vol. 72, pp. 14–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poler, R., Lario, F. C., & Doumeingts, G. (2002). Dynamic modeling of Decision Systems (DMDS). Computers in Industry, 49, 175–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, Charles M. (1996). Fifth Generation Management : Co-creating Through Virtual Enterprising, Dynamic Teaming, and Knowledge Networking Butterworth-Heinemann, p. 184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semini M., Fauske H., Strandhagen J. O. (2006). “Applications of discrete-event simulation to support manufacturing logistics decision-making: a survey”, Proceedings of the 38th conference on Winter simulation, pp. 1946–1953,

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1969).The Science of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass, 1st ed. [3rd ed. in 1996, MIT Press].

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith J. S. (2003). “Survey on the Use of Simulation for Manufacturing System Design and Operation”, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 22, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seguer, R. G., Bigand, M., & Bourey, J.-P. (2010). Transformation of Decisional Models into UML: Application to GRAI Grids. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, (september), 655–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, D.C. (February 2006). “Model-Driven Engineering” (PDF). IEEE Computer. 39 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shvaiko P.(2005). A survey of schema-based matching approaches, Journal on Data Semantics IV 146–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sienou A., Lamine E., Karduck A., Pingaud H. (2007) Conceptual Model of Risk: Towards a Risk Modeling Language. In: Weske M., Hacid MS., Godart C. (eds) Web Information Systems Engineering—WISE 2007 Workshops. WISE 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4832. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taisch, M., Heydari, M., Carosi, A., & Zanetti, C. (2014). Service performance monitoring and control Toolset. Procedia CIRP, 16, 62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatte, S., Andrews, T., Curbera, F., Dholakia, H., Goland, Y., Klein, J., … & Trickovic, I. (2003). Business process execution language for web services version 1.1. Microsoft and others, OASIS Standard BPELv11-May052003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wainer, DEVS TOOLS, hosted by G. Wainer at Carlton University, November 2013, http://www.sce.carleton.ca/faculty/wainer/standard/tools.htm

  • Weske, M., (2007). “Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures”. New York, Springer-Verlag: p. 368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiendahl, H. & Scholtissek, P. (1994). Management and Control of Complexity in Manufacturing. CIRP Annals—Manufacturing Technology, 43(2), p. 533–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y-F. (2008). “Correlated sampling techniques used in Monte Carlo simulation for risk assessment”, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, Vol. 85, pp. 662–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharewicz G.; Frydman C.; Giambiasi N. (2008). “G-DEVS/HLA Environment for Distributed Simulations of Workflows”, Simulation, 84(5), pp. 197–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zacharewicz, G., Diallo, S., Ducq, Y., Agostinho, C., Jardim-Goncalves, R., Bazoun, H., … & Doumeingts, G. (2016). Model-based approaches for interoperability of next generation enterprise information systems: state of the art and future challenges. Information Systems and e-Business Management, 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeigler, B. P., Praehofer, H. and Kim, T. G. (2000). “Theory of modeling and Simulation”, NY.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially supported by the FP7 Research Project MSEE “Manufacturing Service Ecosystem” ID 284860. http://www.msee-ip.eu/

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory Zacharewicz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zacharewicz, G., Pirayesh-Neghab, A., Seregni, M., Ducq, Y., Doumeingts, G. (2017). Simulation-Based Enterprise Management. In: Mittal, S., Durak, U., Ören, T. (eds) Guide to Simulation-Based Disciplines. Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61264-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61264-5_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61263-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61264-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics