Abstract
In Hungary migration, and particularly temporary migration, became an issue following the Communist regime’s four decades of controlled borders and limited transnational mobility. The late 1980s and early 1990s marked a turning point: the previously closed borders of ex-communist Central and Eastern Europe were opened, and, among other countries, Hungary faced increasing inflows of foreign citizens. The first waves came from countries adjacent to Hungary where, for historical reasons, considerable ethnic Hungarian populations lived within a short distance of Hungary. Brubaker (1998) has singled out ethnic Hungarians as a unique source of migration on account of their sheer numbers and the important mix of labour migration, where ethnicity plays a crucial role in engendering, patterning and regulating the immigration flows.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
As a result of the peace treaty concluding World War I, the population and territory of Hungary changed considerably and assumed its present form in 1920. A significant Hungarian minority remained in the territories assigned by the peace treaty to the neighbouring states (half of them to Romania, 27% to Slovakia, 13% to Serbia, 5.5% to Ukraine and the rest to Croatia, Slovenia and Austria, according to the census of 1910). Following the new status quo, various population movements occurred, but the situation remained essentially unchanged.
- 2.
This is regulated by foreign policy and the immigration legislation. Migration strategy was first conceptualised in 2013.
- 3.
According to the census of 2011, 85% of Southeast Asian citizens were living in Budapest or its surroundings and 77% in Budapest. The share is slightly lower for migrants from the Middle East.
- 4.
The languages used in the interviews were English (32), Chinese (12), Vietnamese (9), Turkish (4), Japanese (4) and Urdu (1 – with an interpreter), while 18 were held in Hungarian. Whenever possible, interviews were conducted in the original language of the interviewee. Chinese was used by Chinese-speaking Hungarians.
- 5.
Due to the relevance of temporary migration, Israel and Turkey have been included as intermediate countries between Asia and Europe.
References
Ács, V. (2010). Temporary and circular migration: Empirical evidence, current policy practice and future options in Hungary. EMN report. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/networks/european_migration_network/reports/docs/emn-studies/circular-migration/12._hungary_national_report_circular_migration_version_29oct2010_en.pdf
Altonji, J. G., & Card, D. (1991). The effects of immigration on the labour market outcomes of less-skilled. In J. Abowd & R. Freeman (Eds.), Immigration, trade, and the labour market (pp. 201–234). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Borjas, G. J. (1995). The economic benefits from immigration. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2), 3–22.
Brubaker, R. (1998). Migrations of ethnic unmixing in the “New Europe”. International Migration Review, 32(4), 1047–1065.
Chan, Y. W. (2014). General introduction. Asian migration: Issues, migrants, and regional updates. In Y. W. Chan, D. Haines, & J. Lee (Eds.), The age of Asian migration: Continuity, diversity, and susceptibility (Vol. 1, pp. 1–17). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Chiswick, B. (1999). Are immigrants favourably self-selected. The American Economic Review, 89(2), 181–185.
Faist, T. (2000). The volume and dynamics of international migration and transnational social spaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Faist, T. (2006). The transnational social spaces of migration. Working paper 10. Centre of Migration, citizenship and development, Bielefeld.
Fox, J. E. (2007). From national inclusion to economic exclusion: Ethnic Hungarian labour migration to Hungary. Nations and Nationalism, 13(1), 77–96.
Hárs, Á., & Sik, E. (2009). Hungary. In H. Fassmann, U. Riegel, & W. Sievers (Eds.), Statistics and reality. Concepts and measurements of migration in Europe, Imiscoe Reports (pp. 169–193). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Hárs, Á., & Tóth, J. (2010). Változó migráció – változó környezet [Changing Migration – Changing Milieu], Budapest: MTA ENKI.
Hárs, Á., Sik, E.. & Tóth, J. (2001). Hungary. In C. Wallace, D. Stola (Eds.), Patterns of migration in Central Europe (pp. 252–276). New York: Palgrave.
HCSO. (2013). Demographic Yearbook. Budapest: Hungarian Central Statistical Office.
Hungarian Central Statistical Office. (2011). Retrieved from: http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xstadat/xstadat_eves/i_wnvn001a.html
Kahanec, M., & Zimmermann, K. F. (Eds.). (2010). EU labor markets after post-enlargement migration. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Kováts, A. (2013). Bevándorlás és integráció – magyarországi adatok, európai indikátorok. [Immigration and Integration – Hungarian Data, European Indicators] Budapest: MTA TKKI.
Massey, D. S., Arango, J., Hugo, G., Kouaouci, A., Pellegrino, A., & Taylor, J. E. (1993). Theories of international migration: A review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), 431–466.
Nyíri, P. (2005). Global Modernisers or local subalterns? Parallel perception of Chinese Transnationals in Hungary. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 31(4), 659–974.
Nyíri, P. (2007). Chinese in Eastern Europe and Russia: A middleman minority in a transnational era. Routledge, 2007.
Nyíri, P. (2010). Kínai migránsok Magyarországon: mai tudásunk és aktuális kérdések. [Chinese Migrants in Hungary: Our present knowledge and current questions] In: Á. Hárs & J. Tóth (Eds.), Változó migráció – változó környezet [Changing Migration – Changing Milieu], Budapest: MTA ENKI: 147–171.
Örkény, A. (2011). A harmadik országbeli állampolgárok honosítással kapcsolatos vélekedései, és ezek összefüggése a migráció különféle aspektusaival. [Third-country nationals’ opinions on naturalisation in relation to various aspects of migration] In: A. Kováts (Ed.), Magyarrá válni. Bevándorlók honosítási és integrációs stratégiái [Becoming Hungarian. Naturalisation and Integration Strategies of Immigrants]. Budapest: MTA ENKI: 127–180.
Piore, M. J. (1979). Birds of passage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Skrentny, J. D., Chan, S., Fox J., Kim, D.W.-S (2007) Defining nations in Asia and Europe: A comparative analysis of ethnic return migration policy. (41)4: 793–825.
Stark, O., & Taylor, J. E. (1991). Migration incentives, migration types: The role of relative deprivation. The Economic Journal, 101(408), 1163–1178.
Szymanska-Matusiewicz, G. (2014). Vietnamese from East Europe as a transnational migrant community. In Y. W. Chan, D. Haines, & J. Lee (Eds.), The age of Asian migration: Continuity, diversity, and susceptibility Volume 1 (pp. 189–210) Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Tóth, J (2010). Lehet-e normatív a migrációs politika. [Is a normative migration policy possible in Hungary?] In: Á. Hárs & J. Tóth (Eds.), Változó migráció – változó környezet. [Changing Migration – Changing Milieu] Budapest: MTA ENKI: 193–220.
Tóth, J. (2013). Migrációs jogi környezet Magyarországon. [Legal environment of migration in Hungary]. Magyar Tudomány, 174(3), 244–250.
Tóth, J., & Sik, E. (2014). Hungary. In A. Triandafyllidou & R. Gropas (Eds.), European immigration. A sourcebook (pp. 173–184). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Tulloch, J., & Lupton, D. (2003). Risk and everyday life. London: Sage.
Várhalmi, Z. (2010). A budapesti kínai és vietnami gazdasági klaszterek néhány jellegzetessége. [Some characteristics of the Chinese and Vietnamese economic Clusters in Budapest] In: Á. Hárs and J. Tóth (eds) Változó migráció – változó környezet. [Changing Migration – Changing Milieu] Budapest: MTA ENKI: 173–190.
Várhalmi, Z. (2013) Vállalkozó migránsok Magyarországon. [Migrant entrepreneurs in Hungary] In: Kováts A. (ed) Bevándorlás és integráció – magyarországi adatok, európai indikátorok [Immigration and Integration – Hungarian Data, European Indicators], Budapest: MTA TKKI: 89–100.
Williams, A. M., & Baláž, V. (2012). Migration, risk and uncertainty: Theoretical perspectives. Population, Space and Place, 18(2), 167–180.
Zámbó, K. (2012). National report from Hungary on immigration of international students to the EU. EMN report. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/networks/european_migration_network/reports/docs/emn-studies/immigration-students/12a._hungary_national_report__international_students_jan2013_en_version_en.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hárs, Á. (2018). The Diversity of Temporary Migration in the Case of a Transit Country: Experiences from the Asian-Hungarian Transnational Space. In: Pitkänen, P., Korpela, M., Aksakal, M., Schmidt, K. (eds) Characteristics of Temporary Migration in European-Asian Transnational Social Spaces. International Perspectives on Migration, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61258-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61258-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61257-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61258-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)