Skip to main content

An Economic Lab Experiment for the Best Offer and Approval in Face-to-Face Service Interaction Situation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 1338 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 10371))

Abstract

This article investigates what types of social distance affect the best offer from an employee and its approval from a customer in general service situation. We conduct the deception game (Gneezy, 2005) and investigate the effects of the social distance (face-to-face vs. anonymous interaction) in a laboratory experimental economics method. We observed increases in the rate at which employees made best offers and the rates at which customers accepted offers when face-to-face interactions were conducted. But a statistically significant difference was not observed. Also, the level of trust in others reported by the subject playing the role of the employee had a statistically significant positive effect in cases in which the employee made a best offer. It was also observed that, regardless of whether the interaction was conducted face to face or anonymously, if the subject playing the role of the customer exhibited a low level of tolerance for falsehood, he or she was less likely to accept offers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bochet, O., Page, T., Putterman, L.: Communication and punishment in voluntary contribution experiments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 60(1), 11–26 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bohnet, I., Frey, B.S.: Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games: Comment. American Economic Review 89(1), 335–340 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bohnet, I., Frey, B.S.: The sound of silence in prisoner’s dilemma and dictator games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 38(1), 43–57 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brosig, J., Weimann, J., Ockenfels, A.: The effect of communication media on cooperation. German Economic Review 4(2), 217–241 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burnham, T.: Engineering altruism: a theoretical and experimental investigation of anonymity and gift giving. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 50(1), 133–144 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Charness, G., Gneezy, U.: What’s in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 68(1), 29–35 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Childs, J.: Gender differences in lying. Economics Letters 114(2), 147–149 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dreber, A., Johannesson, M.: Gender differences in deception. Economics Letters 99(1), 197–199 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J.: Some consequences of e-mail vs. face-to-face communication in experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 35(3), 389–403 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gneezy, U.: Deception: The role of consequences. American Economic Review 95(1), 384–394 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gächter, S., Herrmann, B., Thöni, C.: Trust, voluntary cooperation, and socio-economic background: survey and experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 55(4), 505–531 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Holm, H.J., Kawagoe, T.: Face-to-Face Lying–an experimental study in Sweden and Japan. Journal of Economic Psychology 31(3), 310–321 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Isaac, R.M., Walker, J.M.: Communication and free-riding behavior - The voluntary contribution mechanism. Economic Inquiry 26(4), 585–608 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lacey, S., Bruwer, J., Li, E.: The role of perceived risk in wine purchase decisions in restaurants. International Journal of Wine Business Research 21(2), 99–117 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Roth, A.: Bargaining Experiments. In: Kagel, J., Roth, A.(eds.) Handbook of Experimental Economics, pp. 253–348. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Scharlemann, J.P.W., Eckel, C.C., Kacelnik, A., Wilson, R.K.: The value of a smile: Game theory with a human face. Journal of Economic Psychology 22(5), 617–640 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sutter, M.: Deception through telling the truth?! experimental evidence from individuals and teams. The Economic Journal 119(534), 47–60 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenju Akai .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Akai, K., Aoki, K., Onoshiro, K. (2017). An Economic Lab Experiment for the Best Offer and Approval in Face-to-Face Service Interaction Situation. In: Hara, Y., Karagiannis, D. (eds) Serviceology for Services. ICServ 2017. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10371. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61240-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61240-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61239-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61240-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics