Skip to main content

Non-human Sensing: New Methodologies for the Drone Assemblage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Digital Ethnography ((DIETH))

Abstract

Consideration of the drone as a component of an audio/visual methodological assemblage prompts post-phenomenological questions about how bodies act with technologies. Piloting a drone through a live video stream appears to create a sensory extension. Yet the increasing autonomy of the drone, facilitated by exponential innovation in sense-and-avoid technologies, point towards future amalgamations that are increasingly more-than-human. In the context of a plethora of work on the ‘terror’ of the drone, where operational autonomy is politically non-negotiable—for autonomous machines cannot yet be held to account—we suggest here that the non-human, multi- and extrasensory visuality of the drone are more plentiful than terrible, more evasive than invasive, and create practical and imaginative space for experimentation. Here, we first think through the relationships between bodies, ex-bodies and objects in the imaginaries and practices of drone piloting. Then, we suggest that where drones—as aerial avatars—are reshaping methodological imaginations through the unique sensual amalgamations they afford, future drone bodies will be less stringently tethered to the hand and the eye of a human host as the drone flies off on its own, in swarms or alone.

Our machines are disturbingly lively, and we ourselves frighteningly inert.

-Donna Haraway (Haraway 1991, p. 152).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Adey, P. 2010. Aerial Life: Spaces, Mobilities, Affects. London: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anab. 2015. The Drone Aviary Journal. Retrieved from http://superflux.in/index.php/drone-aviary-journal/.

  • Ash, J. 2015. The Interface Envelope: Gaming, Technology, Power. New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atherton, K. 2016, July 14. Small Bird-Shaped Drone Crashes in Mogadishu. Popular Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates, C. 2014. Video Methods: Social Science Research in Motion. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. 1979. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogost, I. 2012. Alien Phenomenology, or What it’s Like to be a Thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chamayou, G. 2015. Drone Theory. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crampton, J.W. 2016. Assemblage of the Vertical: Commercial Drones and Algorithmic Life. Geographica Helvetica 71 (2): 137–146. doi:10.5194/gh-71-137-2016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, J. 2011. Ecologies of a Wayward drone. In From Above: War, Violence and Verticality, ed. P. Adey, M. Whitehead, and A.J. Williams, 263–287. London: Hurst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodd, A. 2014. The Trouble with Insect Cyborgs. Society and Animals 22 (2): 153–173. doi:10.1163/15685306-12341254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, S. 2009. Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructures Fail. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, D. 2011. From a view to a kill. Theory, Culture and Society 28 (7–8): 188–215. doi:10.1177/0263276411423027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D.J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (Vol. New York). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, J. 2017. The Military may Soon Buy the Same Drones you do. Wired.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. 1983. Existential Technics. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, Anab. 2015. The Drone Aviary Journal. Retrieved from http://superflux.in/index.php/drone-aviary-journal/.

  • Lorimer, J. 2010. Moving Image Methodologies for more-than-Human Geographies. Cultural Geographies 17 (2): 237–258. doi:10.1177/1474474010363853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. 2015. The Supernormal Animal. In The Nonhuman Turn, ed. R. Grusin, 1–18. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCosker, A. 2015. Drone Vision, Zones of Protest, and the New Camera Consciousness. Media Fields Journal 9: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parikka, J. 2010. Insect media: An Archaeology of Animals and Technology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pink, S. 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. Manchester: Manchester University Press in Association with the Granada Centre for Visual Anthropology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, A. 2015. Drones. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. 2003. Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vannini, P. 2015. Video Methods Beyond Representation: Experimenting with Multimodal, Sensuous, Affective Intensities in the 21st Century. In Video Methods: Social Science Research in Motion, ed. C. Bates, 230–240. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vertesi, J. 2012. Seeing like a Rover: Visualization, Embodiment, and Interaction on the Mars Exploration Rover Mission. Social Studies of Science 42 (3): 393–414. doi:10.1177/0306312712444645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace-Wells, B. 2014, October 5. Drones and Everything After. New Yorker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whatmore, S. 2002. Hybrid Geographies: Natures, Cultures, Spaces. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bradley L. Garrett .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garrett, B.L., McCosker, A. (2017). Non-human Sensing: New Methodologies for the Drone Assemblage. In: Gómez Cruz, E., Sumartojo, S., Pink, S. (eds) Refiguring Techniques in Digital Visual Research. Digital Ethnography. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61222-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61222-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61221-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61222-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics