Abstract
Consideration of the drone as a component of an audio/visual methodological assemblage prompts post-phenomenological questions about how bodies act with technologies. Piloting a drone through a live video stream appears to create a sensory extension. Yet the increasing autonomy of the drone, facilitated by exponential innovation in sense-and-avoid technologies, point towards future amalgamations that are increasingly more-than-human. In the context of a plethora of work on the ‘terror’ of the drone, where operational autonomy is politically non-negotiable—for autonomous machines cannot yet be held to account—we suggest here that the non-human, multi- and extrasensory visuality of the drone are more plentiful than terrible, more evasive than invasive, and create practical and imaginative space for experimentation. Here, we first think through the relationships between bodies, ex-bodies and objects in the imaginaries and practices of drone piloting. Then, we suggest that where drones—as aerial avatars—are reshaping methodological imaginations through the unique sensual amalgamations they afford, future drone bodies will be less stringently tethered to the hand and the eye of a human host as the drone flies off on its own, in swarms or alone.
Our machines are disturbingly lively, and we ourselves frighteningly inert.
-Donna Haraway (Haraway 1991, p. 152).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Adey, P. 2010. Aerial Life: Spaces, Mobilities, Affects. London: Wiley-Blackwell.
Anab. 2015. The Drone Aviary Journal. Retrieved from http://superflux.in/index.php/drone-aviary-journal/.
Ash, J. 2015. The Interface Envelope: Gaming, Technology, Power. New York: Bloomsbury.
Atherton, K. 2016, July 14. Small Bird-Shaped Drone Crashes in Mogadishu. Popular Science.
Bates, C. 2014. Video Methods: Social Science Research in Motion. New York: Routledge.
Bateson, G. 1979. Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unity. New York: Hampton Press.
Bennett, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham: Duke University Press.
Bogost, I. 2012. Alien Phenomenology, or What it’s Like to be a Thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Chamayou, G. 2015. Drone Theory. New York: Penguin.
Crampton, J.W. 2016. Assemblage of the Vertical: Commercial Drones and Algorithmic Life. Geographica Helvetica 71 (2): 137–146. doi:10.5194/gh-71-137-2016.
Crandall, J. 2011. Ecologies of a Wayward drone. In From Above: War, Violence and Verticality, ed. P. Adey, M. Whitehead, and A.J. Williams, 263–287. London: Hurst.
Dodd, A. 2014. The Trouble with Insect Cyborgs. Society and Animals 22 (2): 153–173. doi:10.1163/15685306-12341254.
Graham, S. 2009. Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructures Fail. London: Routledge.
Gregory, D. 2011. From a view to a kill. Theory, Culture and Society 28 (7–8): 188–215. doi:10.1177/0263276411423027.
Haraway, D.J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (Vol. New York). London: Routledge.
Hsu, J. 2017. The Military may Soon Buy the Same Drones you do. Wired.
Ihde, D. 1983. Existential Technics. New York: SUNY Press.
Jain, Anab. 2015. The Drone Aviary Journal. Retrieved from http://superflux.in/index.php/drone-aviary-journal/.
Lorimer, J. 2010. Moving Image Methodologies for more-than-Human Geographies. Cultural Geographies 17 (2): 237–258. doi:10.1177/1474474010363853.
Massumi, B. 2015. The Supernormal Animal. In The Nonhuman Turn, ed. R. Grusin, 1–18. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
McCosker, A. 2015. Drone Vision, Zones of Protest, and the New Camera Consciousness. Media Fields Journal 9: 1–14.
McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. London: Routledge.
Parikka, J. 2010. Insect media: An Archaeology of Animals and Technology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Pink, S. 2007. Doing Visual Ethnography: Images, Media and Representation in Research. Manchester: Manchester University Press in Association with the Granada Centre for Visual Anthropology.
Rothstein, A. 2015. Drones. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Urry, J. 2003. Global Complexity. Cambridge: Polity.
Vannini, P. 2015. Video Methods Beyond Representation: Experimenting with Multimodal, Sensuous, Affective Intensities in the 21st Century. In Video Methods: Social Science Research in Motion, ed. C. Bates, 230–240. London: Routledge.
Vertesi, J. 2012. Seeing like a Rover: Visualization, Embodiment, and Interaction on the Mars Exploration Rover Mission. Social Studies of Science 42 (3): 393–414. doi:10.1177/0306312712444645.
Wallace-Wells, B. 2014, October 5. Drones and Everything After. New Yorker.
Whatmore, S. 2002. Hybrid Geographies: Natures, Cultures, Spaces. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Garrett, B.L., McCosker, A. (2017). Non-human Sensing: New Methodologies for the Drone Assemblage. In: Gómez Cruz, E., Sumartojo, S., Pink, S. (eds) Refiguring Techniques in Digital Visual Research. Digital Ethnography. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61222-5_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61222-5_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61221-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61222-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)