Abstract
Quantification of capital requirements is a critical issue for any insurer. Solvency is assessed through the regulatory capital, but, in practice, insurance companies usually hold higher levels of economic capital assessed using risk-based models that allow for any type of risk the institution deals with. Once the economic capital of a company is determined, it should be allocated down to lower levels, such as business units, lines and products for a number of purposes and this allocation of capital has crucial importance. This chapter deals with some key aspects related to risk quantification and capital allocation in life insurance. Portfolios composed by different insurance contracts, with both life and death benefits, are investigated. The numerical results obtained explain that the features and benefits of a contract influence not only the assessment of the total risk but also its allocation to single factors, showing that such a risk measurement methodology could be a useful tool for new products improvement and management, in adherence to the principles stated by the Solvency II directive, specifically with respect to the own risk and solvency assessment (ORSA) and the implementation of internal models.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bruno, M., Camerini, E., & Tomassetti, A. (2000). Financial and demographic risks of a portfolio of life insurance policies with stochastic interest rates. Evaluation methods and applications. North American Actuarial Journal, 4, 44–55.
Cairns, A. J. G., Blake, D., & Dowd, K. (2006). A two-factor model for stochastic mortality with parameter uncertainty: Theory and calibration. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73, 687–718.
Cox, J. C., Ingersoll, J. E., & Ross, S. A. (1985). A theory of the term structure of interest rates. Econometrica, 54, 385–407.
Denault, M. (2001). Coherent allocation of risk capital. Journal of Risk, 4(1), 1–34.
Dhaene, J., Tsanakas, A., Valdez, E. A., & Vanduffel, S. (2012). Optimal capital allocation principles. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 79, 1–28.
European Parliament and Council of the European Union. (2009). The taking-up and pursuit of the business of Insurance and Reinsurance (Solvency II), Directive 2009/138/EC.
Gatzert, N., & Wesker, H. (2012). The impact of natural hedging on a life insurer’s risk situation. Journal of Risk Finance, 13(5), 396–423.
Gourieroux, C., Laurent, J., & Scaillet, O. (2000). Sensitivity analysis of values at risk. Journal of Empirical Finance, 7, 225–245.
Karabey, U. (2012). Risk capital allocation and risk quantification in insurance companies. Doctoral thesis, Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Heriot-Watt University.
Karabey, U., Kleinow, T., & Cairns, A. J. G. (2014). Factor risk quantification in annuity models. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 58, 34–45.
McNeil, A., Frey, R., & Embrechts, P. (2005). Quantitative risk management. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Pagan, A., & Ullah, A. (1999). Nonparametric econometrics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Parker, G. (1997). Stochastic analysis of the interaction between investment and insurance risks. NAAJ, 1–2, 55–84.
Rosen, D., & Saunders, D. (2010). Risk factor contributions in portfolio credit risk models. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34, 336–349.
Sherris, M. (2006). Solvency, capital allocation, and fair rate of return in insurance. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 73, 71–96.
Tasche, D. (1999). Risk contributions and performance measurement. Working Paper, Technische Universität München.
Tasche, D. (2006). Measuring sectoral diversification in an asymptotic multi-factor framework. Journal of Credit Risk, 2, 33–55.
Tasche, D. (2008). Capital allocation to business units and sub-portfolios: The Euler principle. In A. Resti (Ed.), Pillar II in the new Basel accord: The challenge of economic capital. London: Risk Books.
Tasche, D. (2009). Capital allocation for credit portfolios with kernel estimators. Quantitative Finance, 9(5), 581–595.
van der Vaart, A. (1998). Asymptotic statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
If the total loss \( L \) is assumed to be a function of two random variables, \( L=g\left({F}_1,{F}_2\right) \), \( {F}_1 \) being the mortality risk and \( {F}_2 \) the investment risk, then the total variance of the loss can be expressed as the sum of two components, the average expected value of the variance of the loss conditioned by the mortality scenario, \( E\left[ Var\left[L|{F}_1\right]\right] \), and the variance of the average expected value conditioned by the mortality scenario,\( Var\left[E\left[L|{F}_1\right]\right] \):
As an alternative it can be considered as the sum of the average expected value of the variance of the loss conditioned by the financial scenario, \( E\left[ Var\left[L|{F}_2\right]\right] \), and the variance of the average expected value conditioned by the financial scenario, \( Var\left[E\left[L|{F}_2\right]\right] \):
The value at time T of an annuity for M years is given by the following formula:
where \( P\left(T,T+i\right) \) is the price at time \( T \) of a zero-coupon bond with maturity \( T+i \) conditional on the information in \( T \) on the term structure of interest rate and \( {\mathbb{E}}_{\mathbb{Q}}\left[S\left(T+i,x\right)|\ {\mathcal{M}}_t\right] \) is the risk-adjusted expectation of the survivor index at time \( T+i \) of a cohort aged x at time T conditional on the information available in T on the term structure of mortality.
Considering the models chosen the value at time \( T \) of an annuity for \( M \) years is given by the following formula:
where \( P\left(T,T+i,r(T)\right) \) is the price at time \( T \) of a zero-coupon bond with maturity \( T+i \) conditional on the value assumed by the spot interest rate \( r(t) \) in \( T \) and \( {\mathbb{E}}_{\mathbb{Q}}\left[S\left(T+i,x\right)|\ k(T)\right] \) is the risk-adjusted expectation of the survivor index at time \( T+i \) of a cohort aged x at time T conditional on the value assumed in T by the mortality trend \( k(t) \) of the Cairns-Blake-Dowd model.
In a similar way, the value at time \( T \) for a term life insurance with term \( M \) is given by:
where the difference \( {\mathbb{E}}_{\mathbb{Q}}\left[S\left(T+i,x\right)|\ k(T)\right]-{\mathbb{E}}_{\mathbb{Q}}\left[S\left(T+i-1,x\right)|\ k(T)\right] \) represents the risk-adjusted expectation of the mortality at time \( T+i \) of a cohort aged x at time T conditional on the value assumed by \( k(t) \) in \( T. \)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Menzietti, M., Pirra, M. (2017). Risk Factor Contributions and Capital Allocation in Life Insurance in the Solvency II Framework. In: Marano, P., Siri, M. (eds) Insurance Regulation in the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61216-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61216-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61215-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61216-4
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)