Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Cultural Studies of Science Education ((CSSE,volume 15))

Abstract

What does it mean to expand the scientific ways of thinking, talking and doing things by utilizing the senses? The focus in this chapter is to argue for the conceptualization of body-mind experiences to try out things through and with the ‘body-mind’. This chapter troubles pedagogies that take little note of the body-mind interactions we have with the material world. Utilizing examples from primary schools, it is argued that a sensory pedagogy in science requires a deliberate sensitization and validation of the senses’ presence and that a sensor pedagogy approach may reveal the unique ways in how we all experience the world. Troubling science education pedagogy is therefore also a reconceptualization of who we are and how we make sense of the world and the acceptance that the body-mind is present, imbalanced and complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aristotle, Ross, G. R. T., & Aristotle. (1906). Aristotle De sensu and De memoria. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatchly, R. A., Delen, Z., & O’Hara, P. B. (2014). Making sense of olive oil: Simple experiments to connect sensory observations with the underlying chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(10), 1623–1630. http://doi.org/10.1021/ed300557r.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockmole, J. R., Davoli, C. C., Abrams, R. A., & Witt, J. K. (2013). The world within reach effects of hand posture and tool use on visual cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(1), 38–44. http://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412465065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromfield-Lee, D. C., & Oliver-Hoyo, M. T. (2007). A qualitative organic analysis that exploits the senses of smell, touch, and sound. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(12), 1976. http://doi.org/10.1021/ed084p1976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, M., Gilroy, P., Howes, D., & Kahn, D. (2006). Introducing sensory studies. The Senses and Society, 1(1), 5–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burke, C., & Grosvenor, I. (2011). The hearing school: An exploration of sound and listening in the modern school. Paedagogica Historica, 47(3), 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, P. S., Briosa, E., Rodrigues, M., Pereira, C., & Ataíde, M. (2013). How to use a candle to study sound waves. The Physics Teacher, 51(7), 398–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, B., Moreland, J., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2013). Expanding notions of assessment for learning: Inside science and technology primary classrooms. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, B., Otrel-Cass, K., Glynn, T., & Kara, H., with Anderson, M., Doyle, J., Parkinson, A., & Te Kiri, C. (2011). Culturally responsive pedagogy and assessment in primary science classrooms: Whakamana tamariki. Summary Report Wellington: Teaching Learning Research Initiative.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1963). How we think. In R. M. Hutchins & M. J. Adler (Eds.), Gateway to the great books (Vol. 10). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1989). Having an experience. In A. Boydston Jo (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, 1925–1953, Art as experience (Vol. 10, pp. 42–63). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de la Isla, T. (2008). Making sense out of everyday routines. Exceptional Parent, 38(2), 34–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1989). Students’ conceptions and the learning of science. International Journal of Science Education, 11(5), 481–490. http://doi.org/10.1080/0950069890110501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eurydice. (2011). Science education in Europe: National Policies, practices and research. Brussels: Eurydice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R. M. (1993). Reaching the second tier: Learning and teaching styles in college science education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(5), 286–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1999). The disciplined mind. Simon & Schuster New York. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/download/30301649/The_Disciplined_Mind.pdf

  • Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 4–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 115–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajnal, A., Abdul-Malak, D. T., & Durgin, F. H. (2011). The perceptual experience of slope by foot and by finger. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(3), 709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, S., & Hamilton, T. J. (2015). Pedagogical tools to explore Cartesian mind-body dualism in the classroom: Philosophical arguments and neuroscience illusions. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01155.

  • Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of women. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, S., & Roth, W.-M. (2007). From designing artifacts to learning science: A dialectical perspective. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(3), 423–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihde, D. (2007). Listening and voice: Phenomenologies of sound. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Milton Park/Abingdon/Oxon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jewitt, C. (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, E., & Løkken, G. (2014). Sensory pedagogy: Understanding and encountering children through the senses. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(8), 886–897. http://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.783776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karana, E., Hekkert, P., & Kandachar, P. (2009). Meanings of materials through sensorial properties and manufacturing processes. Materials & Design, 30(7), 2778–2784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body and Society, 10(2–3), 205–229. http://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X04042943.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malinverni, L., & Pares, N. (2014). Learning of abstract concepts through full-body interaction: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 100–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • McComas, W. F., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The nature of science in science education: An introduction. Science & Education, 7, 511–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception, trans. C. Smith. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). The visible and the invisible: Followed by working notes. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, N. S., & Stieff, M. (2012). Six myths about spatial thinking. International Journal of Science Education, 34(6), 955–971. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.588728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osgood-Campbell, E. (2015, March 1). Investigating the educational implications of embodied cognition: A model interdisciplinary inquiry in mind, brain, and education curricula. Mind, Brain, and Education, 9(1), 3–9. doi:10.1111/mbe.12063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiner, M. (2008). Seeing through touch: The role of haptic information in visualization. In Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 73–84). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5_4

  • Pink, S. (2015). Doing sensory ethnography. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M. (2007). The ethico-moral nature of identity: Prolegomena to the development of third-generation cultural-historical activity theory. International Journal of Educational Research, 46(1–2), 83–93. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2007.07.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, W.-M., & Jornet, A. (2014). Toward a theory of experience. Science Education, 98(1), 106–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. (2007). Researching visual materials: Towards a critical visual methodology. In Dies., Hg., Visual methodologies. An introduction to interpreting visual materials (pp. 1–32). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. (2008). Body consciousness: A philosophy of mindfulness and somaesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shusterman, R. (2012). Thinking through the body: Essays in somaesthetics. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stansfield, W. D. (2012). Science & the senses: Perceptions & deceptions. American Biology Teacher, 74(3), 145–149. http://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2012.74.3.4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorabji, R. (1971). Aristotle on demarcating the five senses. The Philosophical Review, 80(1), 55–79. http://doi.org/10.2307/2184311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, T. (2015). Sensory-based arts education and engagement in the junior classroom: Exploring multiple ways of knowing and meaning. Doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K. (2012). Sociocultural perspectives on science education. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 3–17). Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_1

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The instrumental method in psychology. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in soviet psychology (pp. 135–143). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher mental process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertsch, J. V. (1991). A sociocultural approach to socially shared cognition. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/books/10096/004

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1967). Zettel. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathrin Otrel-Cass .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Otrel-Cass, K. (2018). Sensory Science Education. In: Otrel-Cass, K., Sillasen, M., Orlander, A. (eds) Cultural, Social, and Political Perspectives in Science Education . Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61191-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61191-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61190-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61191-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics