Abstract
This introduction to the “social” in science education that is troubled in the following texts will be based on our own experiences of adopting various socio-material theories in research. These experiences have brought us to recognize the challenges that emerge and which we wish to address in this in-between chapter.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alaimo, S., & Heckman, S. (2008). Material feminism. Bloomington/Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Barad, K. (1998). Getting real: Technoscientific practices and the materialization of reality. Differences, 10(2), 87–128.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway. Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–599.
Haraway, D. (1991). Siamans, cyborgs and women. The reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. (2004). The haraway reader. New York: Routledge.
Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Law, J. (1994). Organizing modernity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Løken, M., & Sørensen, S. Ø. (in review). Materialiteten “kicks back”: Om betydningen av materielle praksiser og erfaringer i forståelsen av kjønnede utdanningsvalg [Tentative title].
Lykke, N. (2009). Genusforskning: En guide till feministisk teori, metodologi och skrift. Stockholm: Liber.
Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Serder, M. (2015). Möten med PISA. Kunskapsmätning som samspel mellan elever och provuppgifter i och om naturvetenskap. [Encounters with PISA. Knowledge assessment as co-action between students and scientific literacy test items]. Malmö: Malmoe University. Dissertation.
Serder, M., & Ideland, M. (2016). PISA truth effects: The construction of low performance. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 37(3), 341–357.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Løken, M., Serder, M. (2018). In-Between Chapter: Troubling the Social – Entanglement, Agency, and the Body in Science Education. In: Otrel-Cass, K., Sillasen, M., Orlander, A. (eds) Cultural, Social, and Political Perspectives in Science Education . Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61191-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61191-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61190-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61191-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)