Skip to main content

Exploring Gender Stereotypes Using Qualitative-Quantitative Methodological Integration

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Supported Qualitative Research (ISQR 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 621))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1321 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents the research possibilities of the integration of qualitative and quantitative methodologies to explore gender stereotypes underlying the professional practice of psychology. The self-report technique, used as a research tool for stereotypes, has shown deficiencies in the control of the effect of social desirability on responses. This research accessed through qualitative methodology the discursive forms used by the study population to express covert gender stereotypes in socially acceptable formulations. From the Discussion Group with Psychology students, textual statements concealing these stereotypes were taken to transform them into items of a quantitative scale to assess large samples. The results were analyzed qualitatively by and with participants in the study. The methodological integration was an adequate strategy to access socially shared meanings, both in the design of instruments and in the explanation of the phenomena investigated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Deaux, K., Kite, M.E.: Thinking about gender. In: Hess, B., Ferree, M. (eds.) Analyzing Gender: A Handbook of Social Science Research, pp. 92–117. Sage, Newbury Park (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deaux, K., Lewis, L.L.: Structure of gender stereotypes: interrelationships among components and gender label. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46(5), 991–1004 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eagly, A.H., Beall, A., Sternberg, R.S.: The Psychology of Gender. Guilford Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eagly, A.H.: Science and politics: a reconsideration. In: Ryan, M.K., Branscombe, N.R. (eds.) Sage Handbook of Gender and Psychology, pp. 11–28. Sage, London (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Broverman, I.K., Broverman, D.M., Clarkson, F.E., Rosenkrantz, P.S., Vogel, S.R.: Sex-role stereotypes and clinical judgments of mental health. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 34(1), 1–7 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. AERA, NCME, APA: Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association, Washington, DC (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Boston (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosenberg, M., Hovland, C.: Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Components of Attitudes. Yale University Press, New Haven (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ferrer, V., Bosch, E.: Introduciendo la perspectiva de género en la investigación psicológica sobre violencia de género. Anales Psicol. 21(1), 1–10 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrer, V., Bosch, E., Ramis, M.C., Navarro, C.: Las creencias y actitudes sobre la violencia contra las mujeres en la pareja. Anales Psicol. 22(2), 251–259 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kahneman, D.: Pensar Rápido, Pensar Despacio, 3rd edn. Penguin Random House, Barcelona (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gardner, R.A.: The Parental Alienation Syndrome: A Guide for Mental Health and Legal Professionals. Creative Therapeutics, Cresskill (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bernet, W.: Parental alienation disorder and DSM-V. Am. J. Fam. Ther. 36(5), 349–366 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bernet, W., von Boch-Galhau, W., Baker, A., Morrison, S.L.: Parental alienation, DSM-V and ICD-11. Am. J. Fam. Ther. 38(2), 76–187 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Delgado, C.: Violencia contra las mujeres y discurso pseudocientífico. El caso del SAP. In: Fernández, O. (coord.) Mujeres en riesgo de exclusión social y violencia de género, pp. 161–170. McGraw Hill, Madrid (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Walker, L.E., Shapiro, D.: Parental alienation disorder: why label children with a mental diagnosis? J. Child Custody 7, 266–286 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vaccaro, S., Barea, C.: Otra forma de Violencia de Género: el pretendido Síndrome de Alienación Parental. Desclée De Brouwer, Bilbao (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Delgado, C.: Viajando a Ítaca por mares cuantitativos. Manual de ruta para investigar en grado y posgrado. Amarú, Salamanca (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gurdián, A.: El paradigma cualitativo en la investigación socio-educativa. Editorial de la Universidad de Costa Rica - CECC- AECI, San José (Costa Rica) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sánchez-Gómez, M.C.: La dicotomía cualitativo-cuantitativo: posibilidades de integración y diseños mixtos. Campo Abierto: Revista de Educación, pp. 11–30 (2015). Monographic volume

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martín-Cilleros, M.V., Sánchez-Gómez, M.C.: Análisis cualitativo de tópicos vinculados a la calidad de vida en personas con discapacidad. Ciencia & Saude Coletiva 21, 2365–2374 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sánchez-Gómez, M.C., Delgado, C., Santos, C.: El proceso de la investigación cualitativa. Manual de procedimiento. Edintras, Valladolid (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Anguera, M.T., Camerino, O., Castañer, M., Sánchez-Algarra, P.: Mixed methods en la investigación de la actividad física y el deporte. Revista de Psicología del Deporte 23(1), 123–130 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Natasi, B., Hitchcock, J., Brown, L.: An inclusive framework for conceptualizing mixed methods design typologies: moving toward fully integrated synergistic research models. In: Tashakkori, A., Teddlie, C. (eds.) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, pp. 305–338. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Martín Baró, I.: Hacia una psicología de la liberación. Revista Electrónica de Intervención Psicosocial y Psicología Comunitaria 2(1), 7–14 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Van Dijk, T.A.: Ideología. Gedisa, Barcelona (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Carmen Delgado Álvarez or Andrés Sánchez-Prada .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Delgado Álvarez, C., Sánchez-Prada, A. (2018). Exploring Gender Stereotypes Using Qualitative-Quantitative Methodological Integration. In: Costa, A., Reis, L., Souza, F., Moreira, A. (eds) Computer Supported Qualitative Research. ISQR 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 621. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61121-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61121-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61120-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61121-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics