Abstract
The field of Computer Assisted Qualitative Data AnalysiS (CAQDAS) is characterised by choices, controversies and challenges. This chapter first briefly outlines the history of the field and discusses choices between and within programs. It goes on to discuss persisting controversies around the appropriateness of using technology for qualitative data analysis. It then outlines challenges arising from these choices and controversies. The chapter concludes by discussing how the Five-Level QDA™ method, a CAQDAS pedagogy that transcends methodologies, software programs and teaching modes, addresses one of the key challenges: how to appropriately enable researchers with varied needs to harness CAQDAS packages powerfully.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The acronym CAQDAS was coined by Raymond Lee and Nigel Fielding in their 1991 book Using Computers in Qualitative Research, which was published following the first conference on qualitative software that they convened in 1989, the Surrey Research Methods Conference (Fielding & Lee, 1991). In 1994 Fielding and Lee went on to establish the CAQDAS Networking Project (CNP) at the University of Surrey, UK, which became an internationally reputed and independent source for practical support, training, information and debate in the use of these technologies. The establishment of the CNP had the effect of ‘fixing’ the acronym. However, other authors (e.g., Bazeley & Jackson, 2013; di Gregorio & Davidson, 2008) refer to this group of software programs as QDAS (Qualitative Data Analysis Software). However, this acronym can be misunderstood to mean software that performs analysis, which none of the writers who use the acronym intend to mean (Woolf & Silver, in press). This chapter uses the term CAQDAS.
References
Woolf, N.: Analytic strategies and analytic tactics. In: ATLAS.ti, Fostering Dialog on Qualitative Methods, Technische UniversitätBerlin. Berlin: Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin (2013). Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:83-opus4-44159
Silver, C., Woolf, N.: From guided-instruction to facilitation of learning: the development of Five-Level QDA as a CAQDAS pedagogy that explicates the practices of expert users. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 18, 527–543 (2015)
Woolf, N., Silver, C.: Qualitative analysis using ATLAS.ti/MAXQDA/NVivo: The Five-Level QDA Method. Routledge, London. in press
Fielding, N.G., Lee, R.M.: Computer Analysis and Qualitative Research. Sage, London (1998)
Davidson, J., Gregorio, S.: Qualitative research and technology: in the midst of a revolution. In: Denzin, N.K, Lincoln, Y. (eds.) Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 627–644. Sage Publications (2011)
Silver, C., Lewins, A.: Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide. Sage Publications, London (2014)
Tesch, R.: Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. Falmer Pr, New York (1990)
Weitzman, E., Miles, M.: Computer Programs for Qualitative Data Analysis: A Software Source Book. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California (1995)
di Gregorio, S.: Using web 2.0 tools for qualitative analysis: an exploration. In: International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10 (2010)
Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y.: Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. (eds.) The Landscape of Qualitative Research, pp. 1–46. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)
Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y.: Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. (eds.) The Landscape of Qualitative Research, pp. 1–44. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2008)
Silver, C., Rivers, C.: The CAQDAS postgraduate learning model: an interplay between methodological awareness, analytic adeptness and technological proficiency. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 19, 593–609 (2015)
Salmona, M., Kaczynski, D.: Don’t blame the software: using qualitative data analysis software successfully in doctoral research. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 17 (2016). Art. 11
White, M.J., Judd, M.D., Poliandri, S.: Illumination with a Dim Bulb? What do social scientists learn by employing qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) in the service of multi-method designs? Sociol. Methodol. 42, 43–76 (2012)
Woods, M., Paulus, T., Atkins, D.P., Macklin, R.: Advancing qualitative research using qualitative data analysis software (QDAS)? Reviewing potential versus practice in published studies using ATLAS.ti and NVivo, 1994–2013. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 34, 597–617 (2015). doi:10.1177/0894439315596311
Gibbs, G.R.: Count: developing STEM skills in qualitative research methods teaching and learning (2014)
Prensky, M.: Digital Narratives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. Horizon 9, 1–6 (2011)
Paulus, T., Lester, J., Dempster, P.: Digital Tools for Qualitative Research (2013)
Bazeley, P., Jackson, K.: Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. SAGE, London (2013)
Seidel, J. V: Qualitative data analysis (1998). ftp://ftp.qualisresearch.com/pub/qda.pdf
Jackson, K., Paulus, T., Woolf, N.: The walking dead: unsubstantiated critiques of qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) and our failure to put them to rest. Qual. Rep. forthcoming
Jackson, K.: Determinism vs. constructivism: the polarizing discourse regarding digital tools for qualitative research and how it threatens our scholarship. In: The International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, Urbana-Champaign,Illinois as part of the Digital Tools for Qualitative Research SIG (2016). Paper #4 in the Critical Plenary
di Gregorio, S., Davidson, J.: Qualitative Research Design for Software Users. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2008)
Silver, C., Bulloch, S.L.: CAQDAS at a crossroads: affordances of technology in an online environment. In: Fielding, N., Lee, R., Blank, G. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. Sage Publications, London (2017)
Davidson, J., Jacobs, C.: The implications of qualitative - research software for doctoral work considering the individual and institutional context. Qual. Res. J. 8, 73–80 (2008)
Johnston, L.: Software and method: reflections on teaching and using QSR NVivo in doctoral research. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 9, 379–391 (2006)
Kuckartz, U.: Realizing Mixed Methods Approaches with MAXQDA (2012)
Richards, T., Richards, L.: Using computers in qualitative research. In: Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Researchtive, pp. 445–462. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)
Paulus, T.M., Bennett, A.M.: “I have a love–hate relationship with ATLAS.ti”TM: integrating qualitative data analysis software into a graduate research methods course. Int. J. Res. Method Educ. 40, 1–17 (2015)
Bourque, C.J., Bourdon, S.: Multidisciplinary graduate training in social research methodology and computer-assisted qualitative data analysis: a hands-on/hands-off course design. J. Furth. High. Educ. 9486, 1–17 (2016)
Leitch, J., Oktay, J., Meehan, B.: A dual instructional model for computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software integrating faculty member and specialized instructor: implementation, reflections, and recommendations. Qual. Soc. Work. (2015)
Carvajal, D.: The Artisan’s tools. Critical issues when teaching and learning CAQDAS. Forum Qual. Sozialforsch. Res. 3 (2002)
Walsh, M.: Teaching qualitative analysis using QSR NVivo 1. Qual. Rep. 8, 251–256 (2003)
Este, D., Sieppert, J., Barsky, A.: Teaching and learning qualitative research with and without qualitative data analysis software. J. Res. Comput. Educ. 31, 17 (1998)
Blank, G.: Teaching qualitative data analysis to graduate students. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 22, 187–196 (2004)
Kaczynski, D., Kelly, M.: Curriculum development for teaching qualitative data analysis online. In: Proceedings of QualIT2004: International Conference on Qualitative Research in IT & IT in Qualitative Research, p. 9 (2004)
Davidson, J., Jacobs, C., Siccama, C., Donohoe, K., Hardy Gallagher, S., Robertson, S.: Teaching qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) in a virtual environment: team curriculum development of an NVivo training workshop. In: Fourth International Congress on Qualitative Inquiry, pp. 1–14 (2008)
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Leech, N.L., Slate, J.R., Stark, M., Sharma, B., Frels, R., Harris, K., Combs, J.P.: An exemplar for teaching and learning qualitative research. Qual. Rport. 17, 646–647 (2012)
Jackson, K.: Blending technology and methodology. A shift towards creative instruction of qualitative methods with NVivo. Qual. Res. J. 15 (2003)
Evers, J.C.: Developments around QDAS: Reflecting on QDAS technicalities from a user perspective in conjunction with developers. Special Issue of The Qualitative Report, edited by Trena Paulus, Jeanine Evers & Franciska de Jong. (forthcoming)
Luttwak, E.N.: Strategy: The Logic of Peace and War, 2nd edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Silver, C. (2018). CAQDAS at a Crossroads: Choices, Controversies and Challenges. In: Costa, A., Reis, L., Souza, F., Moreira, A. (eds) Computer Supported Qualitative Research. ISQR 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 621. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61121-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61121-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61120-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61121-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)