Skip to main content

CAQDAS at a Crossroads: Choices, Controversies and Challenges

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer Supported Qualitative Research (ISQR 2017)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 621))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The field of Computer Assisted Qualitative Data AnalysiS (CAQDAS) is characterised by choices, controversies and challenges. This chapter first briefly outlines the history of the field and discusses choices between and within programs. It goes on to discuss persisting controversies around the appropriateness of using technology for qualitative data analysis. It then outlines challenges arising from these choices and controversies. The chapter concludes by discussing how the Five-Level QDA™ method, a CAQDAS pedagogy that transcends methodologies, software programs and teaching modes, addresses one of the key challenges: how to appropriately enable researchers with varied needs to harness CAQDAS packages powerfully.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The acronym CAQDAS was coined by Raymond Lee and Nigel Fielding in their 1991 book Using Computers in Qualitative Research, which was published following the first conference on qualitative software that they convened in 1989, the Surrey Research Methods Conference (Fielding & Lee, 1991). In 1994 Fielding and Lee went on to establish the CAQDAS Networking Project (CNP) at the University of Surrey, UK, which became an internationally reputed and independent source for practical support, training, information and debate in the use of these technologies. The establishment of the CNP had the effect of ‘fixing’ the acronym. However, other authors (e.g., Bazeley & Jackson, 2013; di Gregorio & Davidson, 2008) refer to this group of software programs as QDAS (Qualitative Data Analysis Software). However, this acronym can be misunderstood to mean software that performs analysis, which none of the writers who use the acronym intend to mean (Woolf & Silver, in press). This chapter uses the term CAQDAS.

References

  1. Woolf, N.: Analytic strategies and analytic tactics. In: ATLAS.ti, Fostering Dialog on Qualitative Methods, Technische UniversitätBerlin. Berlin: Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin (2013). Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:kobv:83-opus4-44159

  2. Silver, C., Woolf, N.: From guided-instruction to facilitation of learning: the development of Five-Level QDA as a CAQDAS pedagogy that explicates the practices of expert users. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 18, 527–543 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Woolf, N., Silver, C.: Qualitative analysis using ATLAS.ti/MAXQDA/NVivo: The Five-Level QDA Method. Routledge, London. in press

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fielding, N.G., Lee, R.M.: Computer Analysis and Qualitative Research. Sage, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Davidson, J., Gregorio, S.: Qualitative research and technology: in the midst of a revolution. In: Denzin, N.K, Lincoln, Y. (eds.) Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 627–644. Sage Publications (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Silver, C., Lewins, A.: Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide. Sage Publications, London (2014)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Tesch, R.: Qualitative Research: Analysis Types and Software Tools. Falmer Pr, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weitzman, E., Miles, M.: Computer Programs for Qualitative Data Analysis: A Software Source Book. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. di Gregorio, S.: Using web 2.0 tools for qualitative analysis: an exploration. In: International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y.: Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. (eds.) The Landscape of Qualitative Research, pp. 1–46. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y.: Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In: Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. (eds.) The Landscape of Qualitative Research, pp. 1–44. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Silver, C., Rivers, C.: The CAQDAS postgraduate learning model: an interplay between methodological awareness, analytic adeptness and technological proficiency. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 19, 593–609 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Salmona, M., Kaczynski, D.: Don’t blame the software: using qualitative data analysis software successfully in doctoral research. Forum Qual. Soc. Res. 17 (2016). Art. 11

    Google Scholar 

  14. White, M.J., Judd, M.D., Poliandri, S.: Illumination with a Dim Bulb? What do social scientists learn by employing qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) in the service of multi-method designs? Sociol. Methodol. 42, 43–76 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Woods, M., Paulus, T., Atkins, D.P., Macklin, R.: Advancing qualitative research using qualitative data analysis software (QDAS)? Reviewing potential versus practice in published studies using ATLAS.ti and NVivo, 1994–2013. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 34, 597–617 (2015). doi:10.1177/0894439315596311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gibbs, G.R.: Count: developing STEM skills in qualitative research methods teaching and learning (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Prensky, M.: Digital Narratives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. Horizon 9, 1–6 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Paulus, T., Lester, J., Dempster, P.: Digital Tools for Qualitative Research (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bazeley, P., Jackson, K.: Qualitative Data Analysis with NVivo. SAGE, London (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Seidel, J. V: Qualitative data analysis (1998). ftp://ftp.qualisresearch.com/pub/qda.pdf

  21. Jackson, K., Paulus, T., Woolf, N.: The walking dead: unsubstantiated critiques of qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) and our failure to put them to rest. Qual. Rep. forthcoming

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jackson, K.: Determinism vs. constructivism: the polarizing discourse regarding digital tools for qualitative research and how it threatens our scholarship. In: The International Congress of Qualitative Inquiry, Urbana-Champaign,Illinois as part of the Digital Tools for Qualitative Research SIG (2016). Paper #4 in the Critical Plenary

    Google Scholar 

  23. di Gregorio, S., Davidson, J.: Qualitative Research Design for Software Users. Open University Press, Maidenhead (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Silver, C., Bulloch, S.L.: CAQDAS at a crossroads: affordances of technology in an online environment. In: Fielding, N., Lee, R., Blank, G. (eds.) The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. Sage Publications, London (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Davidson, J., Jacobs, C.: The implications of qualitative - research software for doctoral work considering the individual and institutional context. Qual. Res. J. 8, 73–80 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Johnston, L.: Software and method: reflections on teaching and using QSR NVivo in doctoral research. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 9, 379–391 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kuckartz, U.: Realizing Mixed Methods Approaches with MAXQDA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Richards, T., Richards, L.: Using computers in qualitative research. In: Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y. (eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Researchtive, pp. 445–462. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Paulus, T.M., Bennett, A.M.: “I have a love–hate relationship with ATLAS.ti”TM: integrating qualitative data analysis software into a graduate research methods course. Int. J. Res. Method Educ. 40, 1–17 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bourque, C.J., Bourdon, S.: Multidisciplinary graduate training in social research methodology and computer-assisted qualitative data analysis: a hands-on/hands-off course design. J. Furth. High. Educ. 9486, 1–17 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Leitch, J., Oktay, J., Meehan, B.: A dual instructional model for computer-assisted qualitative data analysis software integrating faculty member and specialized instructor: implementation, reflections, and recommendations. Qual. Soc. Work. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Carvajal, D.: The Artisan’s tools. Critical issues when teaching and learning CAQDAS. Forum Qual. Sozialforsch. Res. 3 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Walsh, M.: Teaching qualitative analysis using QSR NVivo 1. Qual. Rep. 8, 251–256 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Este, D., Sieppert, J., Barsky, A.: Teaching and learning qualitative research with and without qualitative data analysis software. J. Res. Comput. Educ. 31, 17 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Blank, G.: Teaching qualitative data analysis to graduate students. Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev. 22, 187–196 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kaczynski, D., Kelly, M.: Curriculum development for teaching qualitative data analysis online. In: Proceedings of QualIT2004: International Conference on Qualitative Research in IT & IT in Qualitative Research, p. 9 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Davidson, J., Jacobs, C., Siccama, C., Donohoe, K., Hardy Gallagher, S., Robertson, S.: Teaching qualitative data analysis software (QDAS) in a virtual environment: team curriculum development of an NVivo training workshop. In: Fourth International Congress on Qualitative Inquiry, pp. 1–14 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Leech, N.L., Slate, J.R., Stark, M., Sharma, B., Frels, R., Harris, K., Combs, J.P.: An exemplar for teaching and learning qualitative research. Qual. Rport. 17, 646–647 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Jackson, K.: Blending technology and methodology. A shift towards creative instruction of qualitative methods with NVivo. Qual. Res. J. 15 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Evers, J.C.: Developments around QDAS: Reflecting on QDAS technicalities from a user perspective in conjunction with developers. Special Issue of The Qualitative Report, edited by Trena Paulus, Jeanine Evers & Franciska de Jong. (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Luttwak, E.N.: Strategy: The Logic of Peace and War, 2nd edn. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christina Silver .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Silver, C. (2018). CAQDAS at a Crossroads: Choices, Controversies and Challenges. In: Costa, A., Reis, L., Souza, F., Moreira, A. (eds) Computer Supported Qualitative Research. ISQR 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 621. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61121-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61121-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61120-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61121-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics