Abstract
The use of privatisation and contracting out has constituted a major reform trend in local public service delivery for decades. This chapter evaluates whether there is evidence that contracting out has resulted in improved cost efficiency as argued by reform advocates. The empirical focus is delimited to local road and park services in Danish municipalities, which is an appropriate empirical setting for evaluating the reform outcomes due to the widespread and long-term use of private providers. The main finding is that contracting out has resulted in significant cost reductions. However, the effects are rather heterogeneous across various municipalities and the evidence suggests declining economic effects over time. We conclude that contracting out as a local service delivery reform seems to have “got rusty” over time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bae, S. (2010). Public versus private delivery of municipal solid waste services: The case of North Carolina. Contemporary Economic Policy, 28(3), 414–428.
Bekken, J. T., Longva, F., Fearnley, N., & Osland, O. (2006). Norwegian experiences with tendered bus services. European Transport, 33, 29–40.
Bel, G., & Costas, A. (2006). Do public sector reforms get rusty? Local privatization in Spain. Journal of Policy Reform, 9(1), 1–24.
Bel, G., & Mur, M. (2009). Intermunicipal cooperation, privatization and waste management costs: Evidence from rural municipalities. Waste Management, 29(10), 2772–2778.
Bel, G., & Warner, M. (2008). Does privatization of solid waste and water services reduce costs? A review of empirical studies. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(12), 1337–1348.
Bel, G., Fageda, X., & Warner, M. (2010). Is private production of public services cheaper than public production? A meta-regression analysis of solid waste and water services. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29(3), 553–577.
Blom-Hansen, J. (2003). Is private delivery of public services really cheaper? Evidence from public road maintenance in Denmark. Public Choice, 115(3), 419–438.
Borcherding, T. E., Pommerehne, W. W., & Schneider, F. (1982). Comparing the efficiency of private and public production: The Evidence from five countries. Journal of Economics/Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, (suppl. 2), 127–156.
Boyne, G. A. (1998). Competitive tendering in local government: A review of theory and evidence. Public Administration, 76(4), 695–712.
Dijkgraaf, E., & Gradus, R. H. (2013). Cost advantage cooperations larger than private waste collectors. Applied Economics Letters, 20(7), 702–705.
Domberger, S., & Jensen, P. (1997). Contracting out by the public sector: Theory, evidence, prospects. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 13, 67–78.
Hjelmar, U., Petersen, O. H., & Vrangbæk, K. (2013). Udlicitering af offentlige opgaver i Danmark: En forskningsoversigt over hidtil dokumenterede effekter. Politica, 45(1), 60–79.
Hodge, G. (2000). Privatization—An International Review of Performance. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Houlberg, K., & Petersen, O. H. (2015). Økonomiske effekter af konkurrenceudsættelse på det kommunale vejområde (Delrapport 2). Roskilde: Roskilde University.
Hutchinson, E. B., & Pratt, L. J. (2007). Is contracting out government services the great panacea? Evidence from public school transportation in Louisiana. Journal of Private Enterprise, 23(Fall), 67–83.
Lindholst, A. C., Houlberg, K., & Petersen, O. H. (2015). Økonomiske effekter af udbud af driftsopgaver på det kommunale vej- og parkområde: resultater fra en survey blandt vej- og parkchefer. Roskilde: Roskilde University.
Lindholst, A. C., Hansen, M. B., & Petersen, O. H. (2016). Marketization trajectories in the Danish road and park sectors. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(5), 457–473.
Petersen, O. H., Houlberg, K., & Christensen, L. R. (2015). Contracting out local services: A tale of technical and social services. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 560–570.
Petersen, O. H., Hjelmar, U., & Vrangbæk, K. (2016). Is contracting out of public services still the great panacea? A systematic review of studies on economic and quality effects from 2000–2014. Unpublished manuscript, in review.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. New public management, governance, and the Neo-Weberian State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Savas, E. S. (1987). Privatization: The key to better government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.
Vedung, E. (2010). Four waves of evaluation diffusion. Evaluation, 16(3), 263–277.
Wollmann, H. (2014). Public services in European countries: Between public/municipal and private sector provision—and reverse? In C. N. Silva & J. Bucek (Eds.), Fiscal austerity and innovation in local governance in Europe (pp. 49–73). Surrey: Ashgate.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Houlberg, K., Petersen, O.H. (2018). Reforming Local Service Delivery by Contracting Out? Evaluating the Experience of Danish Road and Park Services. In: Koprić, I., Wollmann, H., Marcou, G. (eds) Evaluating Reforms of Local Public and Social Services in Europe. Governance and Public Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61091-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61091-7_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61090-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61091-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)