Skip to main content

Neuroergonomics Method for Measuring the Influence of Mental Workload Modulation on Cognitive State of Manual Assembly Worker

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications (H-WORKLOAD 2017)

Abstract

In this study, we simulated a manual assembly operation, where participants were exposed to two distinct ways of information presentation, reflecting two task conditions (monotonous and more demanding task condition). We investigated how changes in mental workload (MWL) modulate the P300 component of event-related potentials (ERPs), recorded from wireless electroencephalography (EEG), reaction times (RTs) and quantity of task unrelated movements (retrieved from Kinect). We found a decrease in P300 amplitude and an increase in the quantity of the task unrelated movements, both indicating a decrease in attention level during a monotonous task (lower MWL). During the more demanding task, where a slightly higher MWL was imposed, these trends were not obvious. RTs did not show any dependency on the level of workload applied. These results suggest that a wireless EEG, but also Kinect, can be used to measure the influence of MWL variation on the cognitive state of the workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Tang, A., Owen, C., Biocca, F., Mou, W.: Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 73–80. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Larue, G.S., Rakotonirainy, A., Pettitt, A.N.: Driving performance impairments due to hypovigilance on monotonous roads. Acc. Anal. Prev. 43(6), 2037–2046 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A.: Attention and automation: new perspectives on mental underload and performance. Theoret. Issues Ergon. Sci. 3(2), 178–194 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Desmond, P.A., Hoyes, T.W.: Workload variation, intrinsic risk and utility in a simulated air traffic control task: evidence for compensatory effects. Saf. Sci. 22(1), 87–101 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Karwowski, W.: The discipline of human factors and ergonomics. In: Salvendy, G. (ed.) Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics, pp. 3–37. Wiley, Hoboken (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Parasuraman, R.: Neuroergonomics: research and practice. Theoret. Issues Ergon. Sci. 4(1–2), 5–20 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Parasuraman, R., Rizzo, M.: Introduction to neuroergonomics. In: Parasuraman, R., Rizzo, M. (eds.) Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work, pp. 3–14. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mehta, R.K., Parasuraman, R.: Neuroergonomics: a review of applications to physical and cognitive work. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7(889), 1–10 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mijović, P., Ković, V., De Vos, M., Mačužić, I., Jeremić, B., Gligorijević, I.: Benefits of instructed responding in manual assembly tasks: an ERP approach. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10(171), 1–13 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Picton, T.W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S.A., Johnson, R., Miller, G.A., Ritter, W., Ruchkin, D.S., Rugg, M.D., Taylor, M.J.: Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology 37(2), 127–152 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Polich, J., Kok, A.: Cognitive and biological determinants of P300: an integrative review. Biol. Psychol. 41(2), 103–146 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Polich, J.: Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophys. 118(10), 2128–2148 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Causse, M., Peysakhovich, V., Fabre, E.F.: High working memory load impairs language processing during a simulated piloting task: an ERP and pupillometry study. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10, 1–14 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Salthouse, T.A., Hedden, T.: Interpreting reaction time measures in between-group comparisons. J. Clin. Exp. Neuropsych. 24(7), 858–872 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Luck, S.J., Woodman, G.F., Vogel, E.K.: Event-related potential studies of attention. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4(11), 432–440 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Diego-Mas, J.A., Alcaide-Marzal, J.: Using Kinect™ sensor in observational methods for assessing postures at work. Appl. Ergon. 45(4), 976–985 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rogé, J., Pebayle, T., Muzet, A.: Variations of the level of vigilance and of behavioural activities during simulated automobile driving. Acc. Anal. Prev. 33(2), 181–186 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mijović, P., Milovanović, M., Ković, V., Mijović, B., Gligorijević, I., Minović, M., Mačužić, I.: Communicating the user state: introducing cognition-aware computing in industrial settings. Saf. Sci. (2017, in revision)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gramann, K., Ferris, D.P., Gwin, J., Makeig, S.: Imaging natural cognition in action. Int. J. Psychophys. 91(1), 22–29 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Delorme, A., Makeig, S.: EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J. Neurosci. Methods 134(1), 9–21 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. De Vos, M., De Lathauwer, L., Van Huffel, S.: Spatially constrained ICA algorithm with an application in EEG processing. Sig. Proc. 91(8), 1963–1972 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Mijović, P., Ković, V., De Vos, M., Mačužić, I., Todorović, P., Jeremić, B., Gligorijević, I.: Towards continuous and real-time attention monitoring at work: reaction time versus brain response. Ergonomics 60, 1–14 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Awh, E., Jonides, J.: Overlapping mechanisms of attention and spatial working memory. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5(3), 119–126 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Michalos, G., Makris, S., Rentzos, L., Chryssolouris, G.: Dynamic job rotation for workload balancing in human based assembly systems. CIRP J. Manuf. Sci. Technol. 2(3), 153–160 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is financed under EU—FP7 Marie Curie Actions Initial Training Net-works—FP7-PEOPLE-2011-ITN, project name “Innovation Through Human Factors in Risk Analysis and Management (InnHF)”, project number: 289837.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pavle Mijović .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mijović, P., Milovanović, M., Ković, V., Gligorijević, I., Mijović, B., Mačužić, I. (2017). Neuroergonomics Method for Measuring the Influence of Mental Workload Modulation on Cognitive State of Manual Assembly Worker. In: Longo, L., Leva, M. (eds) Human Mental Workload: Models and Applications. H-WORKLOAD 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 726. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61061-0_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61061-0_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-61060-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-61061-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics