Advertisement

The Norwegian Fishers’ Association, Norway

  • Hoang Viet Thang
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter continues to explore the high level of uncertainty regarding fish stocks by investigating the Norwegian state’s response to the cod crisis in 1989. In this context, the Individual Vessel Quota (IVQ) system was introduced in 1990. By investigating the policy process of the IVQ, the chapter provides an analysis of the dynamic interactions between the state and the Norwegian Fishers’ Association (NFA). The introduction of IVQs marks a start of new fisheries co-management in which the NFA is no longer the only representative of the industry but has to compete with other actors. This finding shows that in fisheries governance, the state often has the capacity to bring new actor(s) into the network for meta-governance purposes. The chapter claims that in fisheries co-management the relation between the FA and the state is not an equal one in terms of authority. Instead the state often plays a central role.

References

  1. Årland, Kristin, and Trond Bjørndal. 2002. Fisheries Management in Norway—An Overview. Marine Policy 26 (4): 307–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berkes, Fikret. 2009. Evolution of Co-management: Role of Knowledge Generation, Bridging Organizations and Social Learning. Journal of Environmental Management 90: 1692–1702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Davis, Anthony, and Svein Jentoft. 2003. The Challenge and the Promise of Indigenous People’s Fishing Rights: From Dependency to Agency. In Indigenous Peoples: Resource Management and Global Rights, ed. Svein Jentoft, Henry Minde, and Ragnar Nilsen. Delft: Eburon Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  4. FAO. 2003. Introducing Fisheries Subsidies. http://www.fao.org/3/a-y4647e/. Accessed 20 May 2014.
  5. Gezelius, Stig S. 2002. Environmental Sustainability and Political Survival: A Comparative Analysis of the Cod Fisheries of Norway and Canada. Environmental Politics 11 (4): 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ———. 2006. Monitoring Fishing Mortality: Compliance in Norwegian Offshore Fisheries. Marine Policy 30 (5): 462–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gezelius, Stig S., and Maria Hauck. 2011. Toward a Theory of Compliance in State-Regulated Livelihoods: A Comparative Study of Compliance Motivations in Developed and Developing World Fisheries. Law & Society Review 45 (2): 435–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gran, Thorvald. 2010. Innovation Systems and Regulation Regimes in Norwegian Fisheries: The Explanatory Power of Networks in the Triple Helix. http://www.leydesdorff.net/th8/TRIPLE%20HELIX%20-%20VIII%20CONFERENCE/PROCEEDINGS/0042_Gran_Thorvald_O-005/innovation%20systems%20in%20Norwegian%20fisheries%20Madrid%20bas%20berg%20x_Paper%2081.doc. Accessed 7 May 2015.
  9. Gullestad, Peter, Asgeir Aglen, Asmund Bjordal, Geir Blom, Sverre Johansen, and Jørn Krog. 2014. Changing Attitudes 1970–2012: Evolution of the Norwegian Management Framework to Prevent Overfishing and to Secure Long-term Sustainability. ICES Journal of Marine Science 71 (2): 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hannesson, Rögnvaldur. 1985. Inefficiency Through Government Regulations: The Case of Norway’s Fishery Policy. Marine Resource Economics 2 (2): 115–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hersoug, Bjorn. 2005. Closing the Commons: Norwegian Fisheries Management from Open Access to Private Property. Delft: Eburon Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Hersoug, Bjørn, Petter Holm, and Stein Arne Rånes. 2000. The Missing T. Path Dependency Within an Individual Vessel Quota System—The Case of Norwegian Cod Fisheries. Marine Policy 24 (4): 319–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Holm, Peter, and Stein Arne Ranes. 1996a. The Individual Vessel Quota System in the Norwegian Arctic Coastal Cod Fisheries. http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/8176/The%20Individual%20Vessel%20Quota%20System%20in%20the%20Norwegian%20Arcticpdf.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Accessed 20 May 2014.
  14. Jentoft, Svein, and Jahn Petter Johnsen. 2015. The Dynamics of Small-scale Fisheries in Norway: From Adaptamentality to Governability. In Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries, ed. S. Jentoft and R. Chuenpagdee. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jentoft, Svein, and Knut H. Mikalsen. 1987. Government Subsidies in Norwegian Fisheries: Regional Development or Political Favouritism? Marine Policy 11 (3): 217–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ———. 2014. Do National Resources Have to Be Centrally Managed? Vested Interests and Institutional Reform in Norwegian Fisheries Governance. Maritime Studies 13 (5): 1–16.Google Scholar
  17. Johnsen, Petter Jahn, and Bjørn Hersoug. 2014. Local Empowerment Through the Creation of Coastal Space? Ecology and Society 19 (2): 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Karagiannakos, A. 1996. Total Allowable Catch (TAC) and Quota Management System in the European Union. Marine Policy 20 (3): 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Makino, M., A.S. Cabanban, and S. Jentoft. 2014. Fishers’ Organizations: Their Role in Decision-Making for Fisheries and Conservation. In Governance of Marine Fisheries and Biodiversity Conservation: Interaction and Coevolution, ed. Serge M. Garcia, Jake Rice, and Anthony Charles. Wiley Blackwell (Online Book).Google Scholar
  20. Maurstad, Anita. 1992. Closing the Commons—Opening the “Tragedy”: Regulating North-Norwegian Small-scale Fishing. http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/2050/Closing_the_Commons_-_opening_the_Tragedy__Regulating_North-Norwegian_Small-Scale_Fishing.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 10 June 2015.
  21. ———. 2000. To Fish or Not to Fish: Small-scale Fishing and Changing Regulations of the Cod Fishery in Northern Norway. Human Organization 59 (1): 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mikalsen, Knut H., Hans-Kristian Hernes, and Svein Jentoft. 2007. Leaning on User-Groups: The Role of Civil Society in Fisheries Governance. Marine Policy 31: 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nilsen, Ragnar. 2003. From Norwegianization to Coastal Sami Uprising. In Indigenous Peoples: Resource Management and Global Rights, ed. Svein Jentoft, Henry Minde, and Ragnar Nilsen. Delft: Eburon Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Nordic Council of Ministers (NCM). 2009. Nordic Experience of Fisheries Management. http://ec.europa.eu/fisheries/reform/docs/nordic_council_02_en.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2015.
  25. OECD. 2006. Financial Support to Fisheries. http://www.oecd.org/agriculture/agricultural-policies/39322313.pdf. Accessed 5 April 2015.
  26. Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institution for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, Carsten. 2014. Fisheries in Coastal Sami Areas; Geopolitical Concerns? Arctic Review on Law and Politics 5: 4–10.Google Scholar
  28. Søreng, Siri Ulfsdatter. 2007. Fishing Rights Struggles. In Norway: Political or Legal Strategies? http://commission-on-legal-pluralism.com/volumes/55/soreng-art.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2014.
  29. ———. 2013. Legal Pluralism in Norwegian Inshore Fisheries: Differing Perceptions of Fishing Rights in Sami Finnmark. Maritime Studies 12 (9): 1–21.Google Scholar
  30. Standal, Dag. 2007. Institutional Changes and Fleet Structure: Towards the Final Solution? Marine Policy 31: 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Standal, Dag, and Bernt Aarset. 2008. The IVQ Regime in Norway: A Stable Alternative to an ITQ Regime? Marine Policy 32: 663–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hoang Viet Thang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Political Science and International StudiesUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations