Critiques of Ostrom’s Approach: A View from Fisheries Governance

  • Hoang Viet Thang


This chapter provides a review of the eight institutional conditions outlined by Ostrom. By analysing these, it shows that they are society-centric and underestimate the capacity of the state in working with resource users. The chapter presents its central argument that the state is an important contributory factor in fostering the success of collective action in common pool resource management and concludes that it is necessary to bring the state back in. Therefore it is widely relevant to introduce the concept of meta-governance into managing common pool resources in association with Ostrom’s conditions.


  1. Agrawal, A. 2003. Sustainable Governance of Common-Pool Resources: Context, Methods, and Politics. Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agrawal, A., and A. Chhatre. 2006. Explaining Success in the Commons: Community Forest Governance in the Indian Himalaya. World Development 34 (1): 149–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agrawal, Arun, and Gautam N. Yadama. 1997. How Do Local Institutions Mediate Market and Population Pressures on Resources? Forest Panchayats in Kumaon, India. Development and Change 28 (3): 435–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anthony, Denise L., and John L. Campbell. 2011. States, Social Capital and Cooperation: Looking Back on Governing the Commons. International Journal of the Commons 5 (2): 284–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardhan, P. 2000. Irrigation and Cooperation: An Empirical Analysis of 48 Irrigation Communities in South India. Economic Development and Cultural Change 48 (4): 847–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell, Stephen, and Andrew Hindmoor. 2009. Rethinking Governance. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berkes, Fikret. 1994. Co-management: Bridging the Two Solitudes. Northern Perspect 22 (2–3): 18–20.Google Scholar
  8. Blaikie, P. 2006. Is Small Really Beautiful? Community-based Natural Resource Management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development 34 (11): 1942–1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carnaje, Gideon P., and Auraleen Mae S. Harina. 2009. Gerschenkron’s Perspective on Backwardness and the Role of Government and Nongovernmental Organizations in the Development of Local Capacity for Collective Action in Coastal Fisheries. Accessed 25 July 2012.
  10. Carpenter, S.R., and L.H. Gunderson. 2001. Coping with Collapse: Ecological and Social Dynamics in Ecosystem Management. BioScience 6: 451–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cinner, J.E., and T.R. McClanahan. 2006. Socioeconomic Factors that Lead to Overfishing in Small-Scale Coral Reef Fisheries of Papua New Guinea. Environmental Conservation 33 (1): 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cleaver, F. 1999. Paradoxes of Participation: Questioning Participatory Approaches to Development. Journal of International Development 11: 597–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clement, F. 2010. Analysing Decentralised Natural Resource Governance: Proposition for a “Politicised” Institutional Analysis and Development Framework. Policy Sciences 43 (2): 129–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clement, Floriane, and Jaime M. Amezaga. 2013. Conceptualising Context in Institutional Reforms of Land and Natural Resource Management: The Case of Vietnam. International Journal of the Commons 7 (1): 140–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delaney, Alyne Elizabeth. 2015. Japanese Fishing Cooperative Associations: Governance in an Era of Consolidation. In Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries, ed. S. Jentoft and R. Chuenpagdee. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Dietz, T.E., Elinor Ostrom, and Paul C. Stern. 2003. The Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science 302: 1907–1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fennell, D., R. Plummer, and M. Marschke. 2008. Is Adaptive Co-management Ethical? Journal of Environmental Management 88: 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gibson, Clark C., Elinor Ostrom, and T.K. Ahn. 2000. The Concept of Scale and the Human Dimensions of Global Change: A Survey. Ecological Economics 32: 217–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guillet, David W. 1992. Covering Ground: Communal Water Management and the State in the Peruvian Highlands. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hardin, Garrett. 1968. The Tragedy of the Common. Science 162: 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jentoft, Svein. 1989. Fisheries Co-management: Delegating Government Responsibility to Fishers’s Organisations. Marine Policy 13 (2): 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jentoft, Svein, and T. Kristofferson. 1998. Fishers’s Co-management: The Case of the Lofoten Fisheries. Human Organization 48 (4): 355–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jentoft, Svein, Bonnie J. McCay, and Douglas C. Wilson. 1998. Social Theory and Fisheries Co-management. Marine Policy 22 (4–5): 423–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jentoft, Svein, and Knut H. Mikalsen. 2014. Do National Resources Have to Be Centrally Managed? Vested Interests and Institutional Reform in Norwegian Fisheries Governance. Maritime Studies 13 (5): 1–16.Google Scholar
  25. Johnsen, Petter Jahn, and Bjørn Hersoug. 2014. Local Empowerment Through the Creation of Coastal Space? Ecology and Society 19 (2): 60–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klooster, D. 2000. Institutional Choice, Community, and Struggle: A Case Study of Forest Co-management in Mexico. World Development 28 (1): 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Knapp, Gunna. 2008. The Chignik Salmon Cooperative. In Case Studies in Fisheries Self-Governance, ed. R. Townsend, R. Shotton, and H. Uchida. Rome: FAO.Google Scholar
  28. Kosamu, Ishmael B.M. 2015. Conditions for Sustainability of Small-scale Fisheries in Developing Countries. Fisheries Research 161: 365–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lim, Cristina P., Yoshiaki Matsuda, and Yukio Shigemi. 1995. Co‐management in Marine Fisheries: The Japanese Experience. Coastal Management 23: 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Makino, Mitsutaku 2008. Marine Protected Areas for the Snow Crab Bottom Fishery Off Kyoto Prefecture, Japan. Accessed 6 May 2013.
  31. Marschke, Melissa, Derek Armitage, Le Van An, Truong Van Tuyen, and Hein Mallee. 2012. Do Collective Property Rights Make Sense? Insights from Central Vietnam. International Journal of the Commons 6 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mosse, David. 1997. The Symbolic Making of a Common Property Resource: History, Ecology and Locality in a Tank-Irrigated Landscape in South India. Development and Change 28 (3): 467–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Olsson, O., C. Folke, and F. Berkes. 2004. Adaptive Co-management for Building Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems. Environmental Management 34: 75–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institution for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. ———. 2005. Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 2010. Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change. Global Environmental Change 29: 550–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pinkerton, Evelyn. 2003. Toward Specificity in Complexity: Understanding Comanagement from a Social Science Perspective. In The Fisheries Co-management Experience, ed. D.C. Wilson, J.R. Nielson, and P. Degnbol. Accessed 5 August 2014.Google Scholar
  38. Pinkerton, E., and M. Weinstein. 1995. Fisheries That Work: Sustainability Through Community-based Management. Accessed 5 May 2014.
  39. Pomeroy, Robert S., and Fikret Berkes. 1997. Two to Tango: The Role of Government in Fisheries Co-management. Marine Policy 21 (5): 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Scharpf, Fritz W. 1994. Games Real Actors Could Play: Positive and Negative Coordination in Embedded Negotiation. Journal of Theoretical Politics 6: 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schlager, E., W. Blomquist, and S.Y. Tang. 1994. Mobile Flows, Storage, and Self-Organized Institutions for Governing Common-Pool Resources. Land Economics 70 (3): 294–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Searle, J.R. 2005. What Is an Institution? Journal of Institutional Economics 1 (1): 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Shelley, P., and T. van Rijn. 2014. The Role of Courts in Fisheries Management and Marine Biodiversity Protection. In Governance of Marine Fisheries and Biodiversity Conservation: Interaction and Coevolution, ed. Serge M. Garcia, Jake Rice, and Anthony Charles. Online Book.Google Scholar
  44. Steins, N.A., and V.M. Edwards. 1999. Collective Action in Common-Pool Resource Management: The Contribution of a Social Constructivist Perspective to Existing Theory. Society and Natural Resources 12 (6): 539–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suenaga, Satoshi. 2008. Sandfish Resource Co-management in Akita Prefecture, Japan. In Case Studies in Fisheries Self-Governance, ed. R. Townsend, R. Shotton, and H. Uchida. Accessed 15 Mar 2014.Google Scholar
  46. Tarko, Vlad. 2012. Elinor Ostrom: Life and Work. In The Future of the Commons. Accessed 5 May 2013.
  47. Tucker, C.M., J.C. Randolph, and E.J. Castellanos. 2007. Institutions, Biophysical Factors and History: An Integrative Analysis of Private and Common Property Forests in Guatemala and Honduras. Human Ecology 35 (3): 259–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Turner, M.D. 1999. Conflict, Environmental Change, and Social Institutions in Dryland Africa: Limitations of the Community Resource Management Approach. Society and Natural Resources 12 (7): 643–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Uchida, Hirotsugu. 2010. Community-based Management for Sustainable Fishery: Lessons from Japan. Accessed 5 Sept 2012.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hoang Viet Thang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Political Science and International StudiesUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations