Advertisement

Introduction

  • Hoang Viet Thang
Chapter

Abstract

This book has seven chapters. This chapter sets out the key definitions explored in the research, such as institutions, power and co-management. It provides an overview of current debates in fisheries governance and co-management arrangements, and then it discusses the focus and structure of the book.

References

  1. Agrawal, A. 2003. Sustainable Governance of Common-Pool Resources: Context, Methods, and Politics. Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 243–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anthony, Denise L., and John L. Campbell. 2011. States, Social Capital and Cooperation: Looking Back on Governing the Commons. International Journal of the Commons 5 (2): 284–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babbie, Earl. 2004. The Practice of Social Research. 10th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  4. Bell, Stephen, and Andrew Hindmoor. 2009. Rethinking Governance. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berg, Bruce L. 2009. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  6. Berkes, Fikret. 2010. Devolution of Environment and Resources Governance: Trends and Future. Environmental Conservation 37 (4): 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berque, Joannes, and Osamu Matsuda. 2013. Coastal Biodiversity Management in Japanese Satoumi. Marine Policy 39: 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryman, Alan. 2004. Social Research Method. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke, Beverley, Laura Stocker, Brian Coffey, Peat Leith, Nick Harvey, Claudia Baldwin, Tom Baxter, et al. 2013. Enhancing the Knowledge–Governance Interface: Coasts, Climate and Collaboration. Ocean and Coastal Management 86: 88–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clement, Floriane, and Jaime M. Amezaga. 2013. Conceptualising Context in Institutional Reforms of Land and Natural Resource Management: The Case of Vietnam. International Journal of the Commons 7 (1): 140–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dahl, Robert. 1957. The Concept of Power. Behavioural Science 2: 201–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Davis, Anthony, and Svein Jentoft. 2003. The Challenge and the Promise of Indigenous People’s Fishing Rights: From Dependency to Agency. In Indigenous Peoples: Resource Management and Global Rights, ed. Svein Jentoft, Henry Minde, and Ragnar Nilsen. Delft: Eburon Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Delgado Christopher L., Nikolas Wada, Mark W. Rosegrant, Siet Meijer, and Mahfuzuddin Ahmed. 2003. Outlook for Fish to 2020. Meeting Global Demand. http://www.ifpri.org/sites/default/files/pubs/pubs/fpr/pr15.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2013.
  14. Dietz, T.E., Elinor Ostrom, and Paul C. Stern. 2003. The Struggle to Govern the Commons. Science 302: 1907–1912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Government of Thua Thien Hue Province. 2004. Decision No. 3677/QD-UB on Approval of the Overall Planning for the Management and Exploitation of Fishery Resources on the Lagoon System of Thua Thien Hue Province up to 2010.Google Scholar
  16. Hardin, Garrett. 1968. The Tragedy of the Common. Science 162: 1243–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hilborn, Ray, Trevor A. Branch, Billy Ernst, Arni Magnusson, Carolina V. Minte-Vera, Mark D. Scheuerell, and Juan L. Valero. 2003. State of the World’s Fisheries. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 28: 359–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jentoft, Svein, and Knut H. Mikalsen. 2014. Do National Resources Have to Be Centrally Managed? Vested Interests and Institutional Reform in Norwegian Fisheries Governance. Maritime Studies 13 (5): 1–16.Google Scholar
  19. Jessop, Bob. 2002. Governance and Meta-Governance. http://www.ceses.cuni.cz/CESES-136-version1-3B_Governance_requisite_variety_Jessop_2002.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2012.
  20. Knoke, David. 1990. Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kolding, J., C. Béné, and M. Bavinck. 2014. Small-scale Fisheries: Importance, Vulnerability and Deficient Knowledge. In Governance of Marine Fisheries and Biodiversity Conservation: Interaction and Coevolution, ed. Serge M. Garcia, Jake Rice, and Anthony Charles. Online Book.Google Scholar
  22. Matsuda, Hiroyuki, Mitsutaku Makino, Minoru Tomiyama, Stefan Gelcich, and Juan Carlos Castilla. 2010. Fishery Management in Japan. Ecological Research 25: 899–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mogalakwe, Monageng. 2009. The Documentary Research Method—Using Documentary Sources in Social Research’. Eastern Africa Social Science Research Review 25 (1): 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nielsen, Jesper Raakjær, Degnbola Poul, K. Kuperan Viswanathanb, Mahfuzuddin Ahmedb, Mafaniso Harac, and Nik Mustapha Raja Abdullah. 2004. Fisheries Co-management—An Institutional Innovation? Lessons from South East Asia and Southern Africa. Marine Policy 28: 151–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nielsen, Jesper Raakjær, and Tomas Vedsmand. 1999. User Participation and Institutional Change in Fisheries Management: A Viable Alternative to the Failures of a Top-down Driven Control? Ocean and Coastal Management 42 (1): 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nursey-Bray, Melissa J., Joanna Vince, Michael Scott, Marcus Haward, Kevin O’Toole, Tim Smith, Nick Harvey, and Beverley Clarke. 2014. Science into Policy? Discourse, Coastal Management and Knowledge. Environmental Science & Policy 38: 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institution for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pomeroy, Robert S. 2001. Devolution and Fisheries Co-management. In Collective Action, Property Rights and Devolution of Natural Resource: Exchange of Knowledge and Implication for Policy, ed. R. Meinzen-Dick, A. Knox, and Di Gregorio. Feldafing, Germany: M. DSE/GTZ. http://rmportal.net/library/content/frame/devolution-pomeroy.pdf/view. Accessed 1 July 2014.Google Scholar
  29. Pomeroy, Robert S., and Fikret Berkes. 1997. Two to Tango: The Role of Government in Fisheries Co-management. Marine Policy 21 (5): 465–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pomeroy, Robert S., Len Garces, Michael Pido, and Geronimo Silvestre. 2010. Ecosystem-based Fisheries Management in Small-scale Tropical Marine Fisheries: Emerging Models of Governance Arrangements in the Philippines. Marine Policy 34: 298–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pomeroy, Robert S., and Patrick McConney. 2007. Conditions for Successful Fisheries Co-management in the Wider Caribbean. http://aquaticcommons.org/12953/1/gcfi_58-8.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2013.
  32. Pomeroy, R.S., and R. Rivera-Guieb. 2006. Fisheries Co-management: A Practical Handbook. Cambridge: International Development Research Center.Google Scholar
  33. Sarantakos, Sotirios. 2005. Social Research. 3rd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  34. ———. 2013. Social Research. 4th ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Scharpf, Fritz W. 1994. Games Real Actors Could Play: Positive and Negative Coordination in Embedded Negotiation. Journal of Theoretical Politics 6: 27–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schrank, William E., and Noel Roy. 2013. The Newfoundland Fishery and Economy Twenty Years After the Northern Cod Moratorium. Marine Resource Economics 28 (4): 397–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sen, S., and J. Raakjær Nielsen. 1996. Fisheries Co-management: A Comparative Analysis. Marine Policy 20 (5): 405–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Skocpol, T. 1985. Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research. In Bringing the State Back In, ed. P.B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer, and T. Skocpol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Takahashi, Baku, and Arie Pieter van Duijn. 2012. Operationalizing Fisheries Co-management. Lessons Learned from Lagoon Fisheries Co-management in Thua Thien Hue Province, Viet Nam. http://www.fao.org/documents/card/en/c/ec606ec4-de5a-5f75-aa6a-a8cf89860104/. Accessed 21 May 2014.
  40. Uchida, Hirotsugu. 2010. Community-based Management for Sustainable Fishery: Lessons from Japan. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5309071ec013.pdf?expires=1413261137&id=id&accname=ocid177546&checksum=A0F2C8B8D39FDA9D0178E3DBA174D4C9. Accessed 5 Sept 2012.
  41. Watson, R., and D. Pauly. 2001. Systematic Distortions in World Fisheries Catch Trends. http://data.fisheries.ubc.ca/references/pdfs/Nature-RegDaniel-11-01.pdf. Accessed 9 Apr 2014.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hoang Viet Thang
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Political Science and International StudiesUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations