Why Big Data Needs the Virtues

  • Frances S. GrodzinskyEmail author
Part of the Philosophical Studies Series book series (PSSP, volume 128)


In this paper I offer a critical reflection on Big Data through the lens of “the virtues” in an attempt to separate much of the “hype” from reality. Part 1 defines what is meant by Big Data and describes why it is valuable. I examine its ethical issues in the context of the characteristics of Big Data as exemplified by the 4V’s: volume, velocity, variety (traditional 3V’s) and a 4th, veracity. Part 2 considers whether Big Data Science is really a “theory free” science based only on statistical correlations. In Part 3, I explore the role of the “Big Data Scientist” and her responsibilities as virtuous epistemic agent. Part 4 applies both virtue ethics and virtue epistemology to Big Data, focusing on how it can be used in an ethically responsible way to benefit society. Finally, I will explain why thinking in terms of the virtues is helpful in the analysis of Big Data because when a Data Scientist habitually acts in accordance with the virtues, she will be better able to cope with the “messiness” and dynamic flux of Big Data with open-mindedness and intellectual courage.


Big data Big data scientist Ethical responsibility Virtue ethics Virtue epistemology Statistical correlations Virtuous epistemic agent 



This keynote talk was presented at CEPE-IACAP 2015. I would like to thank everyone for their comments. I especially want to thank Deborah Johnson, Herman Tavani, Richard Volkman, Alexis Elder, Terry Bynum, Steve Lilley, and the other philosophers of the Research Group at SCSU who offered insightful criticism of earlier versions of this paper.


  1. Buchta, H. (2014, November 25). How did data get to be so big? Inside counsel. Breaking News. Accessed 1 June 2015.
  2. CBS News. (2010). Facebook: One social graph to rule them All. Accessed 7 June 2015.
  3. Douglas, H. E. (2009). Science, policy, and the value-free ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Economic Predictions Research Project. (2012)., Accessed 10 June 2015.
  5. Elgin, C. Z. (2013). Epistemic Agency. In Theory and research in education 11(2). (pp. 135–152). Sage Publishing Company. doi: 10.1177/1477878513485173.
  6. EMC2. (2015). Data science and big data analytics: Discovering, analyzing, visualizing and presenting data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Floridi, L. (1999). Philosophy and computing: An introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Grodzinsky, F., Gumbus, A., & Lilley, S. (2013). Will “smarter” marketing end social discrimination? A critical review. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, 11(3), 132–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gumbus A, & Grodzinsky, F. (2014). Big bad data? An analysis of the positive applications of the uses of Big Data. Ethicomp Proceedings, ETHCOMP 2014. Paris, France.Google Scholar
  10. Kitchin, R. (2014, April–June). Big data, new epistemologies and paradigm shifts. Big Data and Society, Sage Publishing Co. pp. 1–12. doi: 10.1177/2053951714528481.
  11. Lohr, S. (2015). Dataism. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  12. Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Longino, H. (2002). The fate of knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Louden, R. B. (1984). On some vices of virtue ethics. In The Virtues: Contemporary essays on moral character (pp. 66–79). California: Wadsworth Publishing, 1987.Google Scholar
  15. Manyika, J. et al. (2011). Big data: the next frontier for innovation, competition and productivity. McKinsey Global Institute Report.
  16. Mayer-Schonberger, V., & Cukier, K. (2013). Big data: A revolution that will transform how we live, work and think. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
  17. McGuire, T., Manyika, J., & Chui, M. (2012). Why big data is the new competitive advantage. Ivey Business Journal, 76(4), 1–4.Google Scholar
  18. MIT Technology Review. (2013)., Accessed 3 October 2013.
  19. Moor, J. H. (2004). Just Consequentialism and Just Computing. In R. A. Spinello & H. T. Tavani (Eds.), Readings in cyberethics (2nd ed., pp. 407–417). Jones and Bartlett: Sudbury.Google Scholar
  20. Moscaritolo, A. (2012). Internet traffic to reach 1.3 zettabytes by 2016.,,2817,2405038,00.asp. Accessed 15 June 2015.
  21. Murphy, M., & Barton, J. (2014). From a sea of data to actionable insights: Big data and what it means for lawyers. Intellectual property & Technology Law Journal, 26(3), 8–17.Google Scholar
  22. Sherman, N. (1997). Making a necessity of virtue: Aristotle and Kant on virtue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shirky, C. (2009). Algorithmic authority. Accessed 15 June 2015.
  24. Simon, J. (2010). The entanglement of trust and knowledge on the Web. Ethics & Information Technology, 12, 343–355. doi: 10.1007/s10676-010-9243-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vance, A. (2012, October 10). The making of 1 Billion. Bloomberg Business Week.Google Scholar
  26. Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Winsberg, E. (2010). Science in the age of computer simulation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zagzebski, L. (2001). Recovering Understanding. In M. Steup (Ed.), Knowledge, truth, and duty: Essays on epistemic justification, responsibility, and virtue. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Zwitter, A. (2014, July–December). Big data ethics. Big Data & Society, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer Science/ Information Technology, Hersher Institute for EthicsSacred Heart UniversityFairfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations