Skip to main content

Medieval Organicism or Modern Feminist Science? Bombadil, Elves, and Mother Nature

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 714 Accesses

Part of the book series: The New Middle Ages ((TNMA))

Abstract

In her introduction to Tolkien the Medievalist, Jane Chance explains that Tolkien “responded to his modern contexts by retelling his medieval sources and adapting his medieval scholarship to his own voice. Tolkien was, over time, influenced by his own personal medievalism.” Indeed, a leisurely perusal of Tolkien scholarship in general (e.g., as cataloged by West and Johnson, and recounted in Jane Chance’s edited volumes) leaves no doubt as to the indelible mark Tolkien’s training, teaching, and scholarship in medieval literature, language, culture, and mythology left on his subcreation.It is also well-known among Tolkien scholars that Tolkien utilized a tremendous amount of the scientific understanding of his day in fleshing out the details of the cosmology, geology, paleontology, botany, and other aspects of Middle-earth. It is therefore clear that Tolkien was not anti-science; he did, however, make a clear distinction between science and pseudoscience, e.g., between astronomy and astrology, and was a vehement critic of the misuse and overuse of technology that he saw as the corrupt legacy of the Scientific and Industrial Revolutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

eBook
USD   24.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   32.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Campbell, Liam. The Ecological Augury in the Works of J.R.R. Tolkien. Zurich: Walking Tree Publishers, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, Humphrey, ed. The Letters of J.R.R. Tolkien. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Brandon. “Large Number Coincidences and the Anthropic Principle in Cosmology.” In Confrontation of Cosmological Theories with Observational Data: Copernicus Symposium 2, edited by M. S. Longair, 291–298. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 1974.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chance, Jane, ed. Tolkien and the Invention of Myth: A Reader. Lexington: The University Press of Kentucky, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Tolkien the Medievalist. New York: Routledge, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry, Patrick. Defending Middle-Earth: Tolkien, Myth and Modernity, 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, Matthew T. and Jonathan Evans. Ents, Elves, and Eriador: The Environmental Vision of J.R.R. Tolkien. Lexington: The University of Kentucky Press, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, Anne. Myths of Gender: Biological Theories about Women and Men. New York: Basic Books, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazell, Dinah. The Plants of Middle-earth: Botany and Sub-creation. Kent: The Kent University Press, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, Gerard. “‘Beneath the Earth’s Dark Keel’: Tolkien and Geology.” Tolkien Studies 9 (2012): 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffers, Susan. Arda Inhabited: Environmental Relationships in The Lord of the Rings. Kent: The Kent State University Press, 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Judith A. J.R.R. Tolkien: Six Decades of Criticism. Westport: Greenwood Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Evelyn Fox. A Feeling for the Organism. New York: W. H. Freeman and Co., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Reflections on Gender and Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, Kristine. “‘A Little Earth of His Own: Tolkien’s Lunar Creation Myths.” In The Ring Goes Ever On: Proceedings of the Tolkien 2005 Conference. Vol. 2, edited by Sarah Wells, 394–403. Coventry: The Tolkien Society, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Alone Between the Dark and the Light’: ‘The Lay of Aotrou and Itroun’ and Lessons from the Later Legendarium.” In Author of the New Century: T. A. Shippey and the Creation of the Next Canon, edited by John William Houghton, Janet Brennan Croft, Nancy Martsch, John D. Rateliff, and Robin Anne Reid, 221-36. Jefferson: McFarland, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———.“‘It Passes Our Skill in These Days’: Primary World Influences on Durin’s Day.” In The Hobbit and Tolkien’s Mythology, edited by Bradford Lee Eden, 40–58. Jefferson: McFarland, 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “The (Nearly) Discarded Image: Tolkien’s Later Tinkerings with his Medieval Cosmology.” Paper presented at the 49th International Congress on Medieval Studies, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI, May 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “‘A Creature of an Older World’: Tolkien and the Mythology of the Prehistoric.” Lembas Extra (2015): 167–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “‘Ore-ganisms’: The Myth and Meaning of ‘Living Rock’ in Middle-earth.” Paper presented at the Popular Culture Association/American Culture Association National Conference, New Orleans, LA, April 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovelock, James E. and Lynn Margulis. “Atmospheric Homeostasis by and for the Biosphere: The Gaia Hypothesis.” Tellus Series A 26, no. 1 (1974): 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merchant, Carolyn. The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology and the Scientific Revolution. San Francisco: Harper and Row, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Maria. “Watching the Sun.” Hours at Home 11, no. 3 (1870): 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein, or The Modern Prometheus. New York: Signet Classics, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C.P. The Two Cultures: And A Second Look. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenmark, Lisa. “Feminisms and Science.” In The Encyclopedia of Science and Religion, edited by Wesley J. Wildman, 323–326. New York: Macmillan Reference USA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolkien, J.R.R. The Two Towers. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. Morgoth’s Ring. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Silmarillion. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. The Hobbit. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wartofsky, Marx W. “The Critique of Impure Reason II: Sin, Science, and Society.” Science, Technology, and Human Values 6, no. 33 (1980): 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West, Richard C. Tolkien Criticism: An Annotated Checklist. Kent: The Kent State University Press, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Larsen, K. (2017). Medieval Organicism or Modern Feminist Science? Bombadil, Elves, and Mother Nature. In: Vaccaro, C., Kisor, Y. (eds) Tolkien and Alterity. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61018-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics