Skip to main content

Opening Statements at The Hague and Arusha

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Law, Politics and the Limits of Prosecuting Mass Atrocity

Part of the book series: Human Rights Interventions ((HURIIN))

  • 354 Accesses

Abstract

The first opening statements at the ICTY and the ICTR, Rogers explains, were vital ingredients in the trial process and proved fundamental to the reinvigorated efforts to prosecute mass atrocities after the end of the Cold War. This chapter argues that the second generation of international prosecutors no longer needed to overtly vilify discredited utopian movements as neoliberalism was firmly entrenched in many places throughout the world. Nevertheless, their prosecutorial conduct produced a political rhetoric implicitly endorsing the neoliberal dispensation and thereby constituted a form of politics. The chapter also argues that when these prosecutors denounce defendants and call for them to be cast out beyond humanity’s ranks, they do so in support of those seeking to control the modernist project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Prosecutor v Tadić (Indictment (Amended)) ICTY Pre-Trial Chamber IT-94-1-I, 14 December 1995.

  2. 2.

    Prosecutor v Tadić (transcript) ICTY Trial Chamber IT-94-1-T, 7 May 1996, 10.

  3. 3.

    Tadić, 11.

  4. 4.

    Tadić, 12–13.

  5. 5.

    Tadić, 19.

  6. 6.

    Prosecutor v Jean Paul Akayesu (transcript) ICTR Trial Chamber ICTR-94-4-T, 9 January 1997 at [7].

  7. 7.

    Tadić, 13.

  8. 8.

    Tadić, 14.

  9. 9.

    Tadić, 18.

  10. 10.

    Tadić, 20–21.

  11. 11.

    Tadić, 26.

  12. 12.

    Tadić, 34.

  13. 13.

    Akayesu, 28.

  14. 14.

    Akayesu, 29.

  15. 15.

    Akayesu, 29–31.

  16. 16.

    Akayesu, 40.

  17. 17.

    Akayesu, 49.

  18. 18.

    Akayesu, 50.

  19. 19.

    Tadić, 47.

  20. 20.

    Akayesu, 47.

  21. 21.

    Akayesu, 44.

  22. 22.

    Akayesu, 43.

  23. 23.

    Akayesu, 53.

  24. 24.

    Akayesu, 55.

  25. 25.

    Akayesu, 65.

  26. 26.

    Akayesu, 66.

  27. 27.

    Akayesu, 67.

  28. 28.

    Akayesu, 57.

  29. 29.

    Akayesu, 58.

  30. 30.

    Akayesu, 59.

  31. 31.

    Akayesu, 21. (Emphasis added.)

  32. 32.

    Tadić, 11–12.

  33. 33.

    Michael A. Sells, The Bridge Betrayed: Religion and Genocide in Bosnia (Berkley: University of California Press, 1996), 87. For Sells, “[t]he word ‘ethnic’ in ‘ethnic cleansing’ is a euphemism. Bosnian Serbs, Croats, and Muslims all speak the same language, despite the fact that for political reasons they each call it now by a different name. They all trace their descent to tribes that migrated to the area around the sixth century and were Slavic in language and culture by the time they settled in the area. Those who had been singled out for persecution have fallen on the wrong side of a dividing line based solely on religious identity.” At 13.

  34. 34.

    Tadić, 34.

  35. 35.

    Akayesu, 28.

  36. 36.

    Akayesu, 30–32. (Emphasis added.)

  37. 37.

    Payam Akhavan, “Justice and Reconciliation in the Great Lakes Region of Africa: The Contribution of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda,” Duke Journal of Comparative an International Law 7 (1997): 348.

  38. 38.

    Akayesu, 25.

  39. 39.

    Roland Paris, At War’s End: Building Peace After Civil Conflict (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 72 & 107.

  40. 40.

    Anne Orford, Reading Humanitarian Intervention: Human Rights and the Use of Force in International Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 17–18.

  41. 41.

    Martti Koskenniemi, The Politics of International Law (Oxford and Portland: Hart Publishing, 2011), 75.

  42. 42.

    Martti Koskenniemi, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001), 3.

  43. 43.

    Martti Koskenniemi, From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005), 614.

  44. 44.

    Tadić, 11–12.

  45. 45.

    Akayesu, 68–69.

  46. 46.

    Tadić, 27–28, 35, & 39.

  47. 47.

    Akayesu, 49–52.

  48. 48.

    Tadić, 26.

  49. 49.

    Akayesu, 33.

  50. 50.

    Akayesu, 37–38.

  51. 51.

    Tadić, 27.

  52. 52.

    Akhavan, “Justice and Reconciliation,” 329.

  53. 53.

    Payam Akhavan, “Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities?” American Journal of International Law 95 (2001): 7.

  54. 54.

    Gerry Simpson, Law, War and Crime: War Crimes Trials and the Reinvention of International Law (Cambridge: Polity, 2007), 161.

  55. 55.

    Louise Arbour, War Crimes and the Culture of Peace (Toronto, Buffalo, and London: University of Toronto Press, 2002), 46.

  56. 56.

    Paris, At War’s End, 5.

  57. 57.

    Danilo Zolo, Victors’ Justice: From Nuremberg to Baghdad, trans. M.W. Weir (London: Verso, 2009), 158.

  58. 58.

    William Schabas, Unimaginable Atrocities: Justice, Politics, and Rights at the War Crimes Tribunals (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012). 77.

  59. 59.

    John Gray, Black Mass: Apocalyptic Religion and the Death of Utopia (London: Penguin, 2007), 75.

References

  1. Akhavan, Payam. 1997. Justice and Reconciliation in the Great Lakes Region of Africa: The Contribution of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 7: 325–348.

    Google Scholar 

  2. ———. 2001. Beyond Impunity: Can International Criminal Justice Prevent Future Atrocities? American Journal of International Law 95: 7–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arbour, Louise. 2002. War Crimes and the Culture of Peace. Toronto/Buffalo/London: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Gray, John. 2007. Black Mass: Apocalyptic Religion and the Death of Utopia. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Koskenniemi, Martti. 2001. The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. ———. 2005. From Apology to Utopia: The Structure of International Legal Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. ———. 2011. The Politics of International Law. Oxford/Portland: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Orford, Anne. 2003. Reading Humanitarian Intervention: Human Rights and the Use of Force in International Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Paris, Roland. 2004. At War’s End: Building Peace After Civil Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Prosecutor v Tadić (Indictment (Amended)) ICTY Pre-Trial Chamber IT-94-1-I, 14 December 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Prosecutor v Tadić (transcript) ICTY Trial Chamber IT-94-1-T, 7 May 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Prosecutor v Jean Paul Akayesu (transcript) ICTR Trial Chamber ICTR-94-4-T, 9 January 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schabas, William. 2012. Unimaginable Atrocities: Justice, Politics, and Rights at the War Crimes Tribunals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Sells, Michael A. 1996. The Bridge Betrayed: Religion and Genocide in Bosnia. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Simpson, Gerry. 2007. Law, War and Crime: War Crimes Trials and the Reinvention of International Law. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zolo, Danilo. 2009. Victors’ Justice: From Nuremberg to Baghdad, trans. M.W. Weir. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rogers, D. (2018). Opening Statements at The Hague and Arusha. In: Law, Politics and the Limits of Prosecuting Mass Atrocity. Human Rights Interventions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60994-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics