Abracadabra: Imagining Access to Creative Computing Tools for Everyone

  • Joel Sadler
  • Lauren Aquino Shluzas
  • Paulo Blikstein
Part of the Understanding Innovation book series (UNDINNO)


How might we empower anyone to create anything? Designers may dream of whimsical ideas, and then turn these ideas into physical prototypes. Armed with duct-tape, cardboard and illusion, “Wizard of Oz” prototypes may communicate the essence of an idea using only raw materials found in every household. However, for electronic prototyping, the tools needed to create functional devices may not be accessible to technical novices. Physical Computing tools with electronics, sensors, actuators, programmable microcontrollers and microcomputers, are increasing in their affordability, but the tools and knowledge needed to combine these parts may not be readily accessible to the average citizen. Here we examine prototyping through the lens of Creative Computing, and propose that accessibility is the cornerstone of electronic prototyping tools. We explore accessibility through an observational case study of a designer prototyping a smart electronic device. We show that typical electronics prototyping tools have significant accessibility barriers to the everyday novice. This work underscores the need to find new ways of designing Creative Computing tools to be more accessible to the everyday dreamer.


  1. Analytis, S., Sadler, J., & Cutkosky, M. (2015). Creating paper robots increases designers’ confidence to prototype with microcontrollers and electronics. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 48–59. doi: 10.1080/21650349.2015.1092397.
  2. Dreyfuss, H., Henry Dreyfuss Associates, & Tilley, A. R. (1993). The measure of man and woman: Human factors in design. Chicago: Whitney Library Of Design.Google Scholar
  3. Kushner, L. (1993). The book of words. Woodstock, VT: Jewish Lights Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Mace, R. (1997). What is universal design. The Center for Universal Design at North Carolina State University. Retrieved November 19, 2004.Google Scholar
  5. Mellis, D. A., Banzi, M., Cuartielles, D., & Igoe, T. (2007). Arduino: An open electronics prototyping platform. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing (alt.chi), ACM.Google Scholar
  6. Sadler, J. (2016). The anatomy of creative computer: Enabling novices to prototype smart devices. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  7. Sadler, J., & Leifer, L. (2015). TeamSense: Prototyping modular electronics sensor systems for team biometrics. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research (pp. 87–100). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Sadler, J., Durfee, K., Shluzas, L., & Blikstein, P. (2015). Bloctopus: A novice modular sensor system for playful prototyping. In Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, ACM (pp. 347–354).Google Scholar
  9. Sadler, J., Shluzas, L., & Blikstein, P. (2016). Building blocks in creative computing: modularity increases the probability of creative prototyping success. International Journal of Design Creativity and Innovation, 168–184. doi: 10.1080/21650349.2015.1136796.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joel Sadler
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lauren Aquino Shluzas
    • 1
  • Paulo Blikstein
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Design ResearchStanfordUSA
  2. 2.School of Education, Learning Sciences and Technology Design ProgramStanfordUSA
  3. 3.Department of Computer SciencesSchool of EngineeringStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations