Abstract
More companies have begun to leverage the unused potential of place. By re-designing the work place or introducing new spaces that are dedicated to innovation projects, they are attempting to increase employee motivation, team performance, innovation management, and the overall innovativeness of the whole organization. However, companies often struggle with the proper conceptualization of the place. As a result, they copy spatial setups from other organizations. However, such copied places are often not linked to the corporate culture, do not match their users’ needs, and neglect the existing spatial structures; consequently, their effects remain below their actual potential. One reason for this problem may stem from a lack of knowledge regarding how to conceptualize places for innovation processes in general or Design Thinking in particular. This lack of knowledge also holds true for research because research on the place and its effects in both the organizational and managerial contexts is rather scarce. In this chapter, we address the question of how to conceptualize places for Design Thinking. We first provide relevant theoretical foundations and then explain the conceptualization of a Design Thinking place by using the example of HPI D-School Potsdam. This theoretically founded and practically experienced approach will provide the reader with basic knowledge of how to conceptualize places for Design Thinking and addresses both researchers and practitioners.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We distinguish the terms ‘place’ and ‘space’ and provide definitions in Sect. 2.1.
- 2.
Users’ needs refer to more than simply ‘having enough space’ or ‘colorful walls’, as discussed in Sect. 3.2.
- 3.
This is why the HPI D-School retained one traditional seminar room in its building. This room is regularly used to showcase the transformation of a typical room into a space that fosters innovation teamwork by rearranging (and not replacing) the furniture and “hacking the space” (e.g., by using Duct Tape).
References
Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123–167.
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184. doi:10.2307/256995.
Anderson, N., Potocnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations. Journal of Management, 40, 1297–1333.
Bacevice, P., Burow, L., & Triebner, M. (2016). 7 Factors of great office design. Harvard Business Review, 2–8.
Beltagui, A., Darler, W., & Candi, M. (2015). Measuring the deliverable and impressible dimensions of service experience. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24, 478–492. doi:10.1111/caim.12130.
Ceylan, C., Dul, J., & Aytac, S. (2008). Can the office environment stimulate a manager’s creativity? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 18, 589–602.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: HarperCollins.
De Bono, E. (1970). Lateral thinking: A textbook of creativity. London: Penguin.
De Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Doolen, T. L., Hacker, M. E., & Van Aken, E. M. (2003). The impact of organizational context on work team effectiveness: A study of production team. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50, 285–296. doi:10.1109/TEM.2003.817296.
Dul, J., Ceylan, C., & Jaspers, F. (2011). Knowledge workers’ creativity and the role of the physical work environment. Human Resource Management, 50, 715–734. doi:10.1080/078559809.
Elsbach, K. D., & Bechky, B. A. (2007). It’s more than a desk: Working smarter through leveraged office design. California Management Review, 49, 80–102.
Fayard, A.-L., & Weeks, J. (2007). Photocopiers and water-coolers: The affordances of informal interaction. Organization Studies, 28, 605–634. doi:10.1177/0170840606068310.
George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513.
Groys, B. (2014). On the new. London: Verso Books.
Guilford, J. P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 64, 110–118.
Harquail, C. V., & Wilcox King, A. (2010). Construing organizational identity: The role of embodied cognition. Organization Studies, 31, 1619–1648. doi:10.1177/0170840610376143.
Hatch, M. J., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2013). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
CB Insights (2016). From AT&T to Xerox: 52 Corporate Innovation Labs. https://www.cbinsights.com/blog/corporate-innovation-labs/
Kelley, T., & Kelley, D. (2013). Creative confidence: Unleashing the creative potential within us all. Crown Publishing Group.
Klooker, M., Nicolai, C., Matzdorf, S., Trost, A., von Schmieden, K., & Böttcher, L. (2016). On creating workspaces for a team of teams: Learnings from a case study. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design Thinking Research (pp. 67–84). Berlin: Springer.
Kornberger, M., & Clegg, S. R. (2004). Bringing space back in: Organizing the generative building. Organization Studies, 25, 1095–1114. doi:10.1177/0170840604046312.
Lefebvre, H. (1974). La production de l’espace (the production of space). Paris: Anthropos.
Liedtka, J., & Ogilvie, T. (2011). Designing for growth: A design thinking tool kit for managers. New York: Columbia Business School Publishing.
Löw, M. (2000). Raumsoziologie (society of space). Frankfurt/Main: suhrkamp taschenbuch wissenschaft.
O’Doherty, B. (1986). Inside the white cube: The ideology of the gallery space. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Schein, E. H. (1984). Coming to a new awareness of organizational culture. Sloan Management Review, 25, 3–16.
Schmiedgen, J., Rhinow, H., Köppen, E., Meinel, C. (2015). Parts without a whole?—The current state of design thinking practice in organizations. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.
Soja, E. (1989). Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.
The Commission for Architecture & the Built Environment (2005). The impact of office design on business performance.
Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2002). Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance. The Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1137–1148.
Waber, B., Magnolfi, J., & Lindsay, G. (2014). Workspaces that move people. Harvard Business Review, 92, 68–77.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schwemmle, M., Nicolai, C., Klooker, M., Weinberg, U. (2018). From Place to Space: How to Conceptualize Places for Design Thinking. In: Plattner, H., Meinel, C., Leifer, L. (eds) Design Thinking Research. Understanding Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60967-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60967-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60966-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60967-6
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)