Creativity in the Twenty-first Century: The Added Benefit of Training and Cooperation

  • Naama Mayseless
  • Manish Saggar
  • Grace Hawthorne
  • Allan Reiss
Chapter
Part of the Understanding Innovation book series (UNDINNO)

Abstract

Creativity is an important construct driving society and innovation forward. Many organizations have adopted team-based work in order to increase innovation and creativity under the assumption that groups of people tend to produce more creative ideas than individuals. Research has so far shown mixed results with some finding enhanced creativity in teams while others showing the opposite effect. A short literature review of team creativity and how it relates to possible neural networks is presented. In addition, we will integrate key findings from our current research implementing a group training protocol to enhance creative capacity. Participants in our creativity study underwent a distilled version of Creative Gym, a course that has been taught at the d.school for the past 8 years that is purely focused on individual creativity skill building in a group environment. Students enhance their creative confidence and sharpen their individual design thinking skills through hands-on experiences that are comprised of unconventional hands-on exercises organized around nine core themes that engage our human abilities in intersecting ways. Training was performed in a group environment while improving perspective taking, empathy, synthesizing ideas and developing improvisational skills. Creativity was measured, before and after participant training (Time 1 and Time 2), using standardized assessments of creativity. In addition to neuroimaging markers, other cognitive faculties (e.g. executive functioning) and personality were also assessed before and after training (Hawthorne, et al. Design thinking research. Springer, 2014). We will review the literature on team creativity and present key findings from our current research, using group based creativity skill training.

References

  1. Amason, A. C., Thompson, K. R., Hochwarter, W. A., & Harrison, A. W. (1995). Conflict: An important dimension in successful management teams. Organizational Dynamics, 24, 20–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baruah, J., & Paulus, P. B. (2009). Enhancing group creativity: The search for synergy. Research on Managing Groups and Teams, 12, 29–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19, 2767–2796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bott, N., Quintin, E.-M., Saggar, M., Kienitz, E., Royalty, A., Hong, D. W.-C., Liu, N., Chien, Y.-h., Hawthorne, G., & Reiss, A. L. (2014). Creativity training enhances goal-directed attention and information processing. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 120–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Coskun, H., Paulus, P. B., Brown, V., & Sherwood, J. J. (2000). Cognitive stimulation and problem presentation in idea-generating groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4, 307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Dreu, C. K. (2008). The virtue and vice of workplace conflict: Food for (pessimistic) thought. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Dreu, C. K., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. De Dreu, C. K., Greer, L. L., Handgraaf, M. J., Shalvi, S., Van Kleef, G. A., Baas, M., Ten Velden, F. S., Van Dijk, E., & Feith, S. W. (2010). The neuropeptide oxytocin regulates parochial altruism in intergroup conflict among humans. Science, 328, 1408–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Dreu, C. K., Baas, M., Roskes, M., Sligte, D. J., Ebstein, R. P., Chew, S. H., Tong, T., Jiang, Y., Mayseless, N., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G. (2013). Oxytonergic circuitry sustains and enables creative cognition in humans. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, nst094.Google Scholar
  10. De Dreu, C. K., Baas, M., & Boot, N. C. (2015). Oxytocin enables novelty seeking and creative performance through upregulated approach: Evidence and avenues for future research. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 6, 409–417.Google Scholar
  11. DeRosa, D. M., Smith, C. L., & Hantula, D. A. (2007). The medium matters: Mining the long-promised merit of group interaction in creative idea generation tasks in a meta-analysis of the electronic group brainstorming literature. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 1549–1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Diehl, M. (1992). Production losses in brainstorming groups: The effects of group composition on fluency and flexibility of ideas. In Joint Meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology and the Society for Experimental Social Psychology. Belgium: Leuven.Google Scholar
  13. Diehl, M., & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dugosh, K. L., & Paulus, P. B. (2005). Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 313–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dugosh, K. L., Paulus, P. B., Roland, E. J., & Yang, H.-C. (2000). Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edmondson, A. C. (2002). Managing the risk of learning: Psychological safety in work teams. Boston: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  17. Fairchild, J., & Hunter, S. T. (2014). “We’ve got creative differences”: The effects of task conflict and participative safety on team creative performance. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 48, 64–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Farh, J.-L., Lee, C., & Farh, C. I. (2010). Task conflict and team creativity: A question of how much and when. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 1173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fink, A., Grabner, R. H., Gebauer, D., Reishofer, G., Koschutnig, K., & Ebner, F. (2010). Enhancing creativity by means of cognitive stimulation: Evidence from an fMRI study. NeuroImage, 52, 1687–1695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hawthorne, G., Quintin, E. M., Saggar, M., Bott, N., Keinitz, E., Liu, N., Chien, Y. H., Hong, D., Royalty, A., & Reiss, A. L. (2014). Impact and sustainability of creative capacity building: The cognitive, behavioral, and neural correlates of increasing creative capacity. In L. Leifer, H. Plattner, & C. Meinel (Eds.), Design thinking research (pp. 65–77). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hoever, I. J., Van Knippenberg, D., van Ginkel, W. P., & Barkema, H. G. (2012). Fostering team creativity: Perspective taking as key to unlocking diversity’s potential. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ito, M. (2008). Control of mental activities by internal models in the cerebellum. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 304–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jehn, K. A. (1997). A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 530–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kienitz, E., Quintin, E.-M., Saggar, M., Bott, N. T., Royalty, A., Hong, D. W.-C., Liu, N., Chien, Y.-h., Hawthorne, G., & Reiss, A. L. (2014). Targeted intervention to increase creative capacity and performance: A randomized controlled pilot study. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 57–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kowatari, Y., Lee, S. H., Yamamura, H., Nagamori, Y., Levy, P., Yamane, S., & Yamamoto, M. (2009). Neural networks involved in artistic creativity. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1678–1690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams’ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 779–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Martindale, C. (1999). 7 Biological bases of creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nijstad, B. A., & Stroebe, W. (2006). How the group affects the mind: A cognitive model of idea generation in groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 186–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Paulus, P. B., & Brown, V. R. (2007). Toward more creative and innovative group idea generation: A cognitive-social-motivational perspective of brainstorming. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 248–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Paulus, P. B., Kohn, N. W., Arditti, L. E., & Korde, R. M. (2013). Understanding the group size effect in electronic brainstorming. Small Group Research, 44(3), 332–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pearsall, M. J., Ellis, A. P., & Evans, J. M. (2008). Unlocking the effects of gender faultlines on team creativity: Is activation the key? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. The Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305–310.Google Scholar
  35. Saggar, M., Hawthorne, G., Quintin, E.-M., Kienitz, E., Bott, N. T., Hong, D., Chien, Y.-H., Liu, N., Royalty, A., & Reiss, A. L. (2015a). Developing novel methods to assess long-term sustainability of creative capacity building and applied creativity. In H. Plattner, C. Meinel, & L. Leifer (Eds.), Design thinking research (pp. 29–39). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Saggar, M., Quintin, E.-M., Kienitz, E., Bott, N. T., Sun, Z., Hong, W.-C., Chien, Y.-h., Liu, N., Dougherty, R. F., & Royalty, A. (2015b). Pictionary-based fMRI paradigm to study the neural correlates of spontaneous improvisation and figural creativity. Scientific Reports, 5.Google Scholar
  37. Saggar, M., Quintin, E.-M., Bott, N. T., Kienitz, E., Chien, Y.-h., Hong, D. W., Liu, N., Royalty, A., Hawthorne, G., & Reiss, A. L. (2016). Changes in brain activation associated with spontaneous improvization and figural creativity after design-thinking-based training: A longitudinal fMRI study. Cerebral Cortex, bhw171.Google Scholar
  38. Simonton, D. K. (1988). Scientific genius: A psychology of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Stroebe, W., & Diehl, M. (1994). Why groups are less effective than their members: On productivity losses in idea-generating groups. European Review of Social Psychology, 5, 271–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thompson, L. L., & Thompson, M. (2000). Making the team: A guide for managers (p. 15). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Torrance, E. P. (1968). Torrance tests of creative thinking. Lexington: Personnel Press, Incorporated.Google Scholar
  43. Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. The Nature of Creativity, 43–75.Google Scholar
  44. Vandervert, L. R., Schimpf, P. H., & Liu, H. (2007). How working memory and the cerebellum collaborate to produce creativity and innovation. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 18.Google Scholar
  45. Walton, A. P. (2016). Creativity and a human dichotomy: Individual or part of a team? In Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking (pp. 85–102). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naama Mayseless
    • 1
  • Manish Saggar
    • 1
  • Grace Hawthorne
    • 2
  • Allan Reiss
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Interdisciplinary Brain Sciences ResearchStanford University School of MedicineStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Hasso Plattner Institute of Design (d.school)StanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations