Abstract
As a non-hazardous and non-invasive approach to medical diagnostic imaging, ultrasound serves as an ideal candidate for tracking and monitoring pregnancy development. One critical assessment during the first trimester of the pregnancy is the size measurements of the Gestation Sac (GS) and the Yolk Sac (YS) from ultrasound images. Such measurements tend to give a strong indication on the viability of the pregnancy. This paper proposes a novel multi-level trainable segmentation method to achieve three objectives in the following order: (1) segmenting and measuring the GS, (2) automatically identifying the stage of pregnancy, and (3) segmenting and measuring the YS. The first level segmentation employs a trainable segmentation technique based on the histogram of oriented gradients to segment the GS and estimate its size. This is then followed by an automatic identification of the pregnancy stage based on histogram analysis of the content of the segmented GS. The second level segmentation is used after that to detect the YS and extract its relevant size measurements. A trained neural network classifier is employed to perform the segmentation at both levels. The effectiveness of the proposed solution has been evaluated by comparing the automatic size measurements of the GS and YS against the ones obtained gynaecologist. Experimental results on 199 ultrasound images demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposal in producing accurate measurements as well as identifying the correct stage of pregnancy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Lee, L.K., Liew, S.C.: A survey of medical image processing tools. In: 2015 4th International Conference on Software Engineering and Computer Systems (ICSECS) (2015)
Ibrahim, D.A., Al-Assam, H., Du, H., Farren, J., Al-karawi, D., Bourne, T., Jassim, S.: Automatic segmentation and measurements of gestational sac using static B-mode ultrasound images. In: SPIE Commercial + Scientific Sensing and Imaging (2016)
Khazendar, S., Al-Assam, H., Bourne, T., Jassim, S.A.: Automatic identification of early miscarriage based on multiple features extracted from ultrasound images. In: MIUA (2014)
Preisler, J., Kopeika, J., Ismail, L., Vathanan, V., Farren, J., Abdallah, Y., Battacharjee, P., Van Holsbeke, C., Bottomley, C., Gould, D., et al.: Defining safe criteria to diagnose miscarriage: prospective observational multicentre study (2015)
Ectopic Pregnancy and Miscarriage: Diagnosis and Initial Management. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) (2012). Accessed 2015
Pexsters, A., Luts, J., Van Schoubroeck, D., Bottomley, C., Van Calster, B., Van Huffel, S., Abdallah, Y., D’Hooghe, T., Lees, C., Timmerman, D., et al.: Clinical implications of intra-and interobserver reproducibility of transvaginal sonographic measurement of gestational sac and crown–rump length at 6–9 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 38(5), 510–515 (2011)
Doubilet, P.M., Benson, C.B., Bourne, T., Blaivas, M.: Diagnostic criteria for nonviable pregnancy early in the first trimester. N. Engl. J. Med. 369(15), 1443–1451 (2013)
Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha Nebraska. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department/Ultrasound of Early Pregnancy. Creighton University Medical Center (2013). http://web.archive.org/web/20070814054851/http:/radiology.creighton.edu/pregnancy.htm#section4
Uideline, L.: Ultrasound evaluation of first trimester pregnancy complications. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 27(6), 581–585 (2005)
Khazendar, S., Farren, J., Al-Assam, H., Du, H., Sayasneh, A., Bourne, T., Jassim, S.: Automatic Identification of Miscarriage Cases Supported by Decision Strength Using Ultrasound Images of the Gestational Sac (2015)
Geirsson, R., Busby-Earle, R.: Certain dates may not provide a reliable estimate of gestational age. BJOG: Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 98(1), 108–109 (1991)
Kaur, A., Kaur, A.: Transvaginal ultrasonography in first trimester of pregnancy and its comparison with transabdominal ultrasonography. J. Pharm. Bioallied Sci. 3(3), 329 (2011)
Bourne, T.: Why greater emphasis must be given to getting the diagnosis right: the example of miscarriage. Australas. J. Ultrasound Med. 19(1), 3–5 (2016)
Levi, C., Lyons, E., Lindsay, D.: Ultrasound in the first trimester of pregnancy. Radiol. Clin. North Am. 28(1), 19–38 (1990)
Chakkarwar, V., Joshi, M.S., Revankar, P.S., et al.: Automated analysis of gestational sac in medical image processing, pp. 304–309 (2010)
Zhang, L., Chen, S., Li, S., Wang, T.: Automatic measurement of early gestational sac diameters from one scan session. In: SPIE Medical Imaging, p. 796342. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2011)
Dalal, N., Triggs, B.: Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2005) (2005)
Patil, M.S.S., Junnarkar, M.A., Gore, M.D.: Study of texture representation techniques. image 3(3), 267–274 (2014)
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to all the collaborators involved in this work. Department of Early Pregnancy, Imperial College, Professor Tom Bourne and Dr. Jessica Farren for their help in preparing the images and all important information related to the datasets used in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ibrahim, D.A., Al-Assam, H., Jassim, S., Du, H. (2017). Multi-level Trainable Segmentation for Measuring Gestational and Yolk Sacs from Ultrasound Images. In: Valdés Hernández, M., González-Castro, V. (eds) Medical Image Understanding and Analysis. MIUA 2017. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 723. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60964-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60964-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-60963-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-60964-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)