Advertisement

Paraphrastic Academic Writing: Entry Point for First Generation Advanced Bilingual College Students

  • Andrés RamírezEmail author
Chapter
  • 713 Downloads
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 33)

Abstract

The implementation of Reading to Learn (R2L) methodology for first generation college freshmen who are bilingual learners is reviewed. The paper details how this integrated genre-based approach informed by Systemic Functional Linguistics (SFL) supported students in an advanced English as a Second Language (ESL) course to develop linguistic awareness and writing competencies in genres highly valued in college courses. The paper also addresses the programmatic needs and rights of advanced bilinguals, a vastly understudied and underrepresented population in US colleges and universities.

Keywords

Reading to Learn ESL Genre-based pedagogy College writing English Language Learners Systemic Functional Linguistics 

References

  1. Atwan, R. (2013). America now: Short readings from recent periodicals. New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control, and identity: Theory, research, critique (Revised ed.). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  3. Caffarel, A., Matthiessen, C., & Martin, J. (2004). Language typology: A functional perspective. In Amsterdam. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
  4. Christie, F. (1997). Curriculum macrogenres as forms of initiation in a culture. In J. R. Martin & F. Christie (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school (pp. 134–160). London/ Washington, DC: Cassell.Google Scholar
  5. de Oliveira, L., & Iddings, J. (2014). Genre pedagogy across the curriculum theory and application in U.S. classrooms and contexts. Sheffield: Equinox.Google Scholar
  6. Freire, P. (1998). Teachers as cultural workers: Letters to those who dare teach. Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  7. Gebhard, M., & Harman, R. (2011). Reconsidering genre theory in K-12 schools: A response to school reform in the United States. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(1), 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hacker, D. (2011). Sample paper analyzing a text (Sanchez). http://bcs.bedfordstmartins.com/writersref6e/lmcontent/ch07/PDF/Hacker-Sanchez-MLA-Ana-Txt.pdf. Accessed 16 May 2015.
  9. Hacker, D., & Sommers, N. (2011). A writer’s reference (7th ed.). Boston: Bedford/St. Martins.Google Scholar
  10. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as a social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  11. Harman, R. (2013). Literary intertextuality in genre-based pedagogies: Building lexical cohesion in fifth-grade L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 125–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kanno, Y., & Harklau, L. (2012). Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, persistence. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Martin, J.v R. (1992). English text: System and structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  14. Martin, J. R. (2000). Design and practice: Enacting functional linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 116–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martin, J. R. (2016). One of three traditions: Genre, functional linguistics and the Sydney school. In N. Artemeva (Ed.), Trends and tradition in genre studies (pp. 31–79). Ottawa: Inkwell.Google Scholar
  16. Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2005). Designing literacy pedagogy: Scaffolding asymmetries. In J. Webster (Ed.), Continuing discourse on language (pp. 251–280). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Martin, J., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations: Mapping culture. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  18. Martin, J., & White, P. (2005). The language of evaluation. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maton, K. (2011). Theories and things: The semantics of disciplinarity. In F. Christie & K. Maton (Eds.), Disciplinarity functional linguistics and sociological perspectives (pp. 62–84). London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  20. Moore, J., & Schlepegrell, M. (2014). Using a functional linguistics metalanguage to support academic language development in the English language arts. Linguistics and Education, 26, 92–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oropeza, M., Varghese, M., & Kanno, Y. (2010). Linguistic minority students in higher education: Using, resisting, and negotiating multiple labels. Equity and Excellence in Education, 43, 216–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Padolsky, D. (2004). How many school-aged English language learners (ELLs) are there in the U.S.? National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. http://www.ncela.gwu.edu/expert/faq/01leps.htm. Accessed 11 Nov 2015
  23. Rose, D. (2015). New developments in genre-based literacy pedagogy. In C. A. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research (2nd ed., pp. 227–242). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  24. Rose, D. (in press). Languages of Schooling: Embedding literacy learning with genre-based pedagogy. In: Languages of schooling: Explorations into disciplinary literacies. Special issue of European Journal of Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  25. Rose, D. (in press). Building a pedagogic metalanguage I: Curriculum genres. In J. R. Martin (Ed.), Appliable linguistics and academic discourse. Shanghai Jiao Tong University.Google Scholar
  26. Rose, D. (in press). Building a pedagogic metalanguage II: Knowledge genres. In J. R. Martin (Ed.), Appliable linguistics and academic discourse. Shanghai Jiao Tong University.Google Scholar
  27. Rose, D., & Martin, J. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school. Equinox: Sheffield U.K.Google Scholar
  28. Rothery, J. (1996). Making changes: Developing an educational linguistics. In Literacy in society (pp. 86–123). London: Longman.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, K. (2013). Op-Ed: Social media: Friend or foe? Digital Journal. http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/352150#ixzz2g74TbR2O. Accessed 18 Apr 2014
  30. Tabarrok, A. (2013). Tuning in to dropping out. In R. Atwan (Ed.), America now. Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
  31. U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2002). The Condition of Education 2002, NCES 2002–025. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA

Personalised recommendations