Advertisement

Translanguaging in Systemic Functional Linguistics: A Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy for Writing in Secondary Schools

  • Nihal KhoteEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Educational Linguistics book series (EDUL, volume 33)

Abstract

Bilingualism is often perceived as a deficit in English only classrooms. Multilingual students, however, have sophisticated cognitive strategies that can be leveraged in school contexts. This chapter investigates how SFL genre pedagogy and translanguaging can function as integral resources in a culturally sustaining instructional framework to support the meaning-making practices of high school bilingual learners in persuasive writing. Findings from the study show that when immersed in this culturally sustaining framework, students successfully learned how patterns of academic language (e.g. grammatical metaphors) function in expository texts to build arguments and challenge dominant worldviews.

Keywords

Systemic functional linguistics Culturally sustaining SFL Translanguaging Emergent bilinguals Persuasive writing 

References

  1. AACTE. (n. d). About edTPA. edtpa.aacte.org/about-edtpa. Accessed 21 June 2007.
  2. Auer, P. (1998). Introduction: Bilingual conversation revisited. In P. Auer (Ed.), Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction and identity (pp. 1–24). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Auer, P. (2002). Code-switching in conversation: Language, interaction, and identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique (Revised ed.). London: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (Richard Nice, Trans.) (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Brisk, M., & Zisselberger, M. (2010). We’ve let them in on a secret: Using SFL theory to improve the teaching of writing to bilingual learners. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Preparing all teachers to teach English language learners (pp. 111–126). Mahwah: Erlbaum/Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  8. Bunch, G. (2006). “Academic English” in the 7th grade: Broadening the lens, expanding access. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 284–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bunch, G. (2009). “Going up there”: Challenges and opportunities for language minority students during a mainstream classroom speech event. Linguistics and Education, 20, 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bunting, J. D., Diniz, L., & Reppen, R. (2012). Grammar and beyond. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Byrnes, H. (2013). Positioning writing as meaning making in writing research: An introduction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, 95–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Callahan, R. M., Wilkinson, L., & Muller, C. (2010). Academic achievement and course taking among language minority youth in U.S. schools: Effects of ESL placement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32, 84–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Canagarajah, S. (2011). Codemeshing in academic writing: Identifying teachable strategies of translanguaging. Modern Language Journal, 95, 401–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Canagarajah, S. (2013). Negotiating translingual literacy: An enactment. Research in the Teaching of English, 48(1), 40–67.Google Scholar
  15. Christie, F. (2002). The development of abstraction in adolescence in subject English. In M. J. Schleppegrell & M. Colombi (Eds.), Developing advanced literacy in first and second languages: Meaning with power (pp. 45–66). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.Google Scholar
  16. Christie, F., & Derewianka, B. (2008). School discourse: Learning to write across the years of schooling. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  17. Christie, F., & Macken-Horarik, M. (2007). Building verticality in subject English. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Language, knowledge and pedagogy (pp. 156–183). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  18. Coffin, C. (2006). Learning the language of school history: The role of linguistics in mapping the writing demands of the secondary school curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38(4), 413–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards. Georgia Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www.gadoe.org/Curriculum-Instruction-and-Assessment/Assessment/Pages/Georgia-Milestones-Assessment-System.aspx. Accessed on 20 Oct 2013.
  20. Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (1993). The powers of literacy: Genre approaches to teaching literacy. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  21. Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2010). Multilingualism. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  22. Cummins, J., & Man, E. Y. (2007). Academic language: What is it and how do we acquire it? In J. Cummins & C. Davison (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 797–810). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. de Certeau, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life (Steven Rendall, Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
  24. de Oliveira, L. C. (2011). Knowing and writing school history: The language of students’ expository writing and teachers’ expectations. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Delpit, L. (1988). The silenced dialogue: Power and pedagogy in educating other people’s children. Harvard Educational Review, 58(3), 280–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Delpit, L. (1995). Other People’s children. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  27. Dyson, A. H. (1993). Social worlds of children learning to write in an urban primary school. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  28. Dyson, A. H. (2003). Negotiating a permeable curriculum: On literacy, diversity, and the interplay of children’s and teachers’ worlds. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED359548. Accessed 30 Oct 2012.
  29. Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Pinter.Google Scholar
  30. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  31. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  32. Fang, Z., & Schleppegrell, M. (2010). Disciplinary literacies across content areas: Supporting secondary reading through functional language analysis. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 53(7), 587–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fang, Z., & Schleppergrell, M. (2008). Reading in secondary content areas: A language based pedagogy. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  34. Fang, Z., Schleppegrell, M., & Cox, B. (2006). Understanding the language demands of schooling: Nouns in academic registers. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(3), 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Flores, N., & Schissel, J. L. (2014). Dynamic bilingualism as the norm: Envisioning a heteroglossic approach to standards-based reform. TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 454–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Garcıa, O. (2009). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. García, O., & Kleifgen, J. (2010). Educating emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs and practices for English language learners. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  38. García, O., & Li, W. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gebhard, M., & Harman, R. (2011). Reconsidering genre theory in K-12 schools: A response to school reforms in the United States. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20, 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gebhard, M., Harman, R., & Seger, W. (2007). Reclaiming recess: Learning the language of persuasion. Language Arts, 84(5), 419–430.Google Scholar
  41. Gutierrez, K. (2008). Developing a sociocritical literacy in the third space. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 148–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gutiérrez, K., Báquedano-López, P., & Turner, M. G. (1997). Putting language back into language arts: When the radical meets the third space. Language Arts, 74(5), 368–378.Google Scholar
  43. Gutiérrez, K., Baquedano-López, P., Alvarez, H., & Chiu, M. M. (1999). Building a culture of collaboration through hybrid language practices. Theory Into Practice, 38, 87–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Halliday, M. A. K. (1989). Part A. In M. A. K. Halliday & R. Hasan (Eds.), Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (pp. 1–49). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5(2), 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
  47. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1985). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
  48. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Halliday, M., & Matthiesen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  50. Hao, J., & Humphrey, S. (2012). Burnishing and tarnishing in academic literacy. In J. S. Knox (Ed.), Papers from the 39th International Systemic Functional Congress. Sydney: The Organising Committee of the 39th International Systemic Functional Congress.Google Scholar
  51. Harklau, L. (2000). From the “good kids” to the “worst”: Representations of English language learners across educational settings. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 35–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Harman, R., & Khote, N. (2015). Culturally sustaining SFL praxis: Academic iiteracies, multilingualism and social equity. Paper presented at International Systemic Functional Linguistics Congress, Aachen, Germany https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280936145_Culturally_Sustaining_SFL_praxis_with_Adolescent_Bilingual_Learners. Accessed 5 Jan 2016.
  53. Harman, R., & Simmons, A. (2014). Critical systemic functional linguistics and literary narratives in subject English: Promoting language awareness and social action among K-12 students. In L. C. De Oliveira & J. G. Iddings (Eds.), Genre studies and language in education (pp. 75–91). Sheffield: Equinox Publishing.Google Scholar
  54. Hasan, R. (1996). Literacy, everyday talk and society. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 377–424). London: Longman.Google Scholar
  55. Helderman, R. S. (2013). Partisan divide remains on how to tackle immigration. https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2013/02/14/despite-bipartisan-call-for-immigration-reform-partisan-divides-remain/fe77gk2oajJTnH1MsSvP8K/ story.html. Accessed 13 Jan 2013.Google Scholar
  56. Heller. (1995). Code-switching and the politics of language. In L. Milroy & P. Muysken (Eds.), One speaker, two languages: Cross-disciplinary perspectives (pp. 158–174). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Hillocks, G. (2010). Teaching argument for critical thinking and writing: An introduction. English Journal, 99(6), 24–32.Google Scholar
  58. Humphrey, S., Love, K., & Droga, L. (2011). Working grammar: An introduction for English teachers. Port Melbourne: Pearson.Google Scholar
  59. Hyland, K. (2002). Authority and invisibility: Authorial identity in academic writing. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1091–1112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Hyland, K. (2013). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  61. Irizarry, J. (2011). The Latinization of U. S. schools: Successful teaching and learning in shifting cultural contexts. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  62. Janks, H. (2002). Critical literacy: Beyond reason. Australian Educational Researcher, 29(1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Janks, H. (2005). Language and the design of texts. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 4(3), 97–110.Google Scholar
  64. Kanno, Y., & Cromley, J. G. (2013). English language learners’ access to and attainment in postsecondary education. TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), 89–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Koven, M. (2001). Comparing bilinguals’ quoted performances of self and others in tellings of the same experiences in two languages. Language in Society, 30(04), 513–558.Google Scholar
  66. Kramsch, C. (2009). Third culture and language education. In V. Cook & L. Wei (Eds.), Contemporary applied linguistics, Language teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 233–254). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  67. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2000). Strategies, tactics and the politics of literacy: Genres and classroom practices in a context of change. http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED444171. Accessed 14 Oct 2013.
  69. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Li, W. (2011). Moment analysis and translanguaging space: Discursive construction of identities by multilingual Chinese youth in Britain. Journal of Pragmatics, 43, 1222–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lucas, T., & Villegas, A. M. (2011). A framework for preparing linguistically responsive teachers. In T. Lucas (Ed.), Teacher preparation for linguistically diverse classrooms: A resource for teacher educators (pp. 55–72). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Macken-Horarik, M. (1996). Literacy and learning across the curriculum: Towards a model of register for secondary school teachers. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 232–278). London: Longman.Google Scholar
  73. Macken-Horarik, M. (1998). Exploring the requirements of critical school literacy: A view from two classrooms. In F. Christie & R. Misson (Eds.), Literacy and schooling (pp. 74–103). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  74. Martin, J. (1989). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Martin, J. (1992). English text: System and structure. Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Martin, J. (1993). Genre and literacy-modeling context in educational linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 13, 141–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Martin, J., & Rothery, J. (1980). Writing Project Report No. l. Sydney: Department of Linguistics, University of Sydney.Google Scholar
  78. Martínez-Roldán, C., & Fránquiz, M. E. (2009). Latina/o youth literacies: Hidden funds of knowledge. In L. Christenbury, R. Bomer, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 323–342). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  79. Menken, K. (2008). English language learners left behind: Standardized testing as language policy. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  80. Menken, K., & Kleyn, T. (2010). The long-term impact of subtractive schooling in the educational experiences of secondary English language learners. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 13, 399–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Messerli, J. (2012). Should America maintain or increase the level of legal immigration? http://www.balancedpolitics.org/immigration.htm. Accessed 28 Jan 2013.
  82. Moje, E. B., Mcintosh-Ciechanowski, K., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working towards third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (2005). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. In N. Gonzalez, L. C. Moll, & C. Amanti (Eds.), Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities and classrooms (pp. 71–87). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  84. Moll, D., Sato, E., Boals, T., & Hedgspeth, C. A. (2015). Multilingual learners and academic literacy: Sociocultural contexts of literacy development of adolescents. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. National Center for Education Statistics (2010). Fast facts. http://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=27. Accessed 14 Oct 2012.Google Scholar
  86. New Democrat Coalition. (2013). Strengthening our Country through Comprehensive Immigration Reform. https://newdemocratcoalition-kind.house.gov/press-release/new-democrat-coalition-immigration-task-force-strengthening-our-economy-through. Accessed 28 Jan 2013.
  87. Nieto, S., & Bode, P. (2008). Affirming diversity: The sociopolitical context of multicultural education (5th ed.). Boston: Pearson/Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  88. Ontheissues. (n.d.). Republican party on immigration. http://www.ontheissues.org/Celeb/Republican_Party_Immigration.htm. Accessed 28 Jan 2013.Google Scholar
  89. Paris, D. (2012). Culturally sustaining pedagogy: A needed change in stance, terminology, and practice. Educational Researcher, 41(3), 93–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Paris, D., & Alim, S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Rose, D., & Martin, J. (2012). Learning to write, reading to learn: Genre, knowledge and pedagogy in the Sydney school. South Yorkshire: Equino1.Google Scholar
  92. Rothery, J. (1989). Language and the discussion genre. Sydney: Metropolitan East Disadvantaged School Program.Google Scholar
  93. Rothery, J. (1996). Making changes: Developing an educational linguistics. In R. Hasan & G. Williams (Eds.), Literacy in society (pp. 86–123). London: Longman.Google Scholar
  94. Schleppegrell, M. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  95. Schleppegrell, M. (2006). The challenges of academic language in school subjects. In I. Lindberg & K. Sandwall (Eds.), Språket och kunskapen: att lära på sitt andraspråk i skola och högskola (pp. 47–69). Göteborg: Göteborgs Universitet Institutet.Google Scholar
  96. Schleppegrell, M., & Go, A. (2007). Analyzing the writing of English learners: A functional approach. Language Arts, 84(6), 529–538.Google Scholar
  97. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). Urbana: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Unsworth, L. (2000). Researching language in schools and communities. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
  99. Valenzuela, A. (1999). Subtractive schooling: US–Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  100. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  101. Walquí, A. (2000). Access and engagement: Program design and instructional approaches for immigrant students in secondary school. Topics in immigrant education 4. Language in education: Theory and practice 94. Washington: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.Google Scholar
  102. Woolard, K. A. (1998). Simultaneity and bivalency as strategies in bilingualism. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 8(1), 3–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Woolard, K. (2004). Codeswitching. In A. Duranti (Ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 73–75). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  104. Wortham, S. E. F., Murillo, E., & Hamann, E. (2002). Education in the new Latino diaspora: Policy and the politics of identity. Westport: Ablel.Google Scholar
  105. Zwiers, J. (2007). Building academic language: Essential practices for content classrooms, grades 5–12. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kennesaw State UniversityKennesawUSA

Personalised recommendations